IÉSEG School of Management vs Université de Strasbourg - UNISTRA vs emlyon business school vs ESCE Paris International Business School vs EM Strasbourg Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 389 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging and practical learning experiences
- +Strong international community and global opportunities
- +Supportive professors and active student associations
- +International environment and diverse student life
- +High-quality academics and supportive professors
- +Engaging courses with practical applications
- +Practical, international focus and diverse student body.
- +Strong career support and professional experience opportunities.
- +Diverse program options and personal project development.
- +International environment and diverse student body
- +Engaging and challenging academic programs taught by industry professionals
- +Supportive staff and personalized learning experiences
- +International focus and diverse student body
- +Supportive and engaging faculty
- +Dynamic student life and activities
- +High academic standards and professional faculty
- +Focus on holistic development, including values and social impact
- +Rigorous and structured learning environment
- +Practical, group-focused learning and professional initiation.
- +High-quality teaching and supportive faculty mentorship.
- +Strong professional network and vibrant student life.
- -Last-minute changes disrupt scheduling and planning.
- -Perceived lack of effort to improve classroom experience.
- -Concerns about course offerings and professor quality.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities, including dirty and neglected campus areas and issues with pests in student residences and dining facilities.
- -Significant administrative and management problems that negatively impact student experience.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to dissatisfaction.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a frequent concern.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Lack of resources and support hinders learning.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of engagement and transparency from instructors is a common complaint.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
- -Lack of student support and responsiveness from administration.
- -Uninspiring curriculum and teaching methods.
This university receives high marks across most categories, particularly excelling in **Internationality** (4.55). **Location** (4.29), **Student Life** (4.25), and **Value** (4.31) also demonstrate considerable strengths. Conversely, **Accomodation** (3.78) stands out as the weakest area among the assessed aspects, while **Facilities** (4.09) received a solid, yet comparatively lower, rating.
With a strong emphasis on student experience, this university excels in **Student Life** and **Location**, both receiving ratings above 4.4. **Internationality** also scores well at 4.27. Areas for improvement include **Accomodation**, which earned the lowest score at 3.73, followed by **Facilities** at 3.95. **Professors** and **Value** demonstrate solid performance, with ratings around 4.1.
This institution demonstrates a generally positive standing, with its strongest areas being **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.6. **Student Life** and **Value** also received high marks, around 4.3 and 4.49 respectively. The **Facilities** and **Professors** are rated well, in the low 4s. **Accomodation** appears to be the relatively weakest area, with a score of 4.
This institution receives outstanding marks for its facilities, professors, and location, all scoring an impressive 4.75. Student life and value are also well-regarded at 4.25, with internationality close behind at 4.5. The weakest area of performance is accommodation, receiving a rating of 3.5. Overall, the university demonstrates significant strengths in its core offerings and campus environment.
A review of university ratings reveals a well-rounded institution. The strongest aspects appear to be Location and Internationality, both scoring above 4.3. Professors and Value are also highly rated, at 4.17. Areas for potential improvement include Facilities and Accomodation, which received scores of approximately 3.9. Student Life sits at a solid 4.
The university's strongest aspect is its accommodation, receiving a perfect score. However, significant weaknesses are apparent across most other surveyed areas, with facilities, professors, location, student life, internationality, and value all scoring zero. This indicates considerable room for improvement in nearly all facets of the university experience outside of its housing provisions.
This university demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location**, receiving a high rating of 4.64. **Student Life** and **Internationality** are also well-regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower score of 2.5. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Value** fall within a moderate to good range.
With a 4.38/5 average, ~99% of reviews are positive, praising interesting classes, international experiences, and practical preparation for work. A minimal 0.8% of feedback is negative, citing some course content and last-minute changes.
University of Strasbourg reviews are predominantly positive (~97.6%), highlighting international atmosphere, knowledgeable professors, and engaging courses. A small fraction (~2.4%) notes issues with campus maintenance and facilities.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~90% 4-5 stars) with an average rating of 4.53/5. Students praise the academic rigor, practical and international focus, and diverse student body.
With an average rating of 4.25/5, 100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight excellent international environments and engaging programs, often taught by experienced professionals. Some note a preference for in-person learning over online options.
Students highly praise the university's international environment, supportive professors, and dynamic student life. Approximately 83% of feedback is positive, with no negative reviews.
With an average rating of 5/5 and 100% positive feedback, students praise exceptional academic standards and dedicated faculty. They also highlight the university's focus on shaping empathetic humans with a commitment to social justice and positive global impact.
Most student feedback is positive (~63% 4-5 stars), highlighting excellent pedagogy, practical experiences, and supportive staff. The average rating is 3.81/5, with no negative reviews.
IÉSEG offers interactive teaching and international opportunities. I had the chance to go on an exchange to another country, which opened up new perspectives for me. The courses in Lille are stimulating, and the professors are very involved in our success.
The ITIRI (faculty of translation) guarantees a high-quality linguistic preparation, as long as some practical classes that help understand what it would really be like to be a translator. There's an admission test and it costs 4500 per year. The master lasts 2 years.
Nothing to show
In an MSc fast track program, I had the privilege of spending time a large and intensive period with each educator, including supporting staff. From core marketing classes to general soft skill and one on one meetings, a large sum went above and beyond what was expected. From moral, educational, in some cases emotional support, the staff laid down a foundation for me to grow and reach my truest potential. In their own personal capacities, each staff took a unique approach to part with their knowledge, wisdom, support and experience. From an educational perspective, the educators sparked curiosity, critical and analytical thinking in me, allowing me to look at the world of business, advertising and marketing in a new light. While some information may have come across as “far fetched” or “hard to believe” it showcased that the program wasn’t merely looking to scratch the surface, but project the future, years in advance. With majority of the courses I take, I found my own passion for the content, mounding it in a way that I could use, apply and consider in my professional career. However, at the core of my memorable experience was the personal contact I had with a large majority ESCE professional staff. They made me feel welcome, accepted, and seen, allowing me to voice my thoughts, my own experience, and knowledge. I believe my masters success would not be possible without the influence of all members at ESCE.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This university has a lot of qualities such as adapting to students in order to optimize learning, and the desire to confront the student as quickly as possible with the world of work. On the other hand, I would criticize this school for poorly disseminated information and a gloomy community life.
