London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs ONCAMPUS Global vs Glasgow Caledonian University vs Ulster University vs Greenwich Business School

Side-by-side comparison from 532 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: London Academy of Trading - LAT (5.00)
London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE: wins 0/7 categories
ONCAMPUS Global: wins 0/7 categories
Glasgow Caledonian University: wins 0/7 categories
Ulster University: wins 0/7 categories
Greenwich Business School: wins 0/7 categories
London Academy of Trading - LAT: wins 7/7 categories
UK Trading Academy: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics
London, The United Kingdom
4.80
Read more reviews
21 reviews
×
Best programme: Undergraduate Foundation Programme
London, The United Kingdom
4.40
Read more reviews
139 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Management
Belfast, The United Kingdom
4.40
Read more reviews
39 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration in Management
London, The United Kingdom
4.30
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Event Management
London, The United Kingdom
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Advanced Trading Course
London, The United Kingdom
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.05
4.44
4.46
4.08
4.25
5.00
Win
Not rated
Location
4.78
4.75
4.76
4.15
4.50
5.00
Win
Not rated
Professors
4.26
4.76
4.34
4.38
4.25
5.00
Win
Not rated
Internationality
4.80
4.62
4.53
4.10
4.50
5.00
Win
Not rated
Student life
3.65
4.58
4.36
3.95
4.25
5.00
Win
Not rated
Value
4.05
4.52
4.49
4.28
4.50
5.00
Win
Not rated
Accommodation
3.80
4.35
3.94
3.61
4.00
4.50
Win
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Knowledgeable and approachable faculty
  • +High-quality academic programs and clear feedback
  • +Excellent facilities and resources
  • +Supportive and approachable teachers
  • +Excellent student support services
  • +Convenient campus location and facilities
  • +Welcoming and inclusive environment with supportive staff.
  • +Strong focus on employability and industry-relevant programs.
  • +Well-equipped campus with convenient city center location.
  • +Strong academic programmes and industry-focused courses
  • +Supportive lecturers and a welcoming environment
  • +Excellent location and facilities
  • +Engaging and supportive faculty.
  • +Comprehensive and industry-relevant course content.
  • +Excellent facilities and student life.
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable tutors
  • +Engaging daily webinars with market analysis
  • +Improved trading profitability and understanding

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Poor teaching quality and unstructured courses.
  • -High fees combined with lack of support and career services.
  • -Limited social life and judgmental environment.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and lack of clear communication are frustrating.
  • -Limited resources and support for academic needs are a concern.
  • -Limited focus on practical skills and "hard facts."
  • -Cumbersome administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology.
  • -Administrative & management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -The campus facilities appear to be outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Communication and support from university staff are often perceived as lacking.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Inflexible or irrelevant course content is a common complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of engagement and uninspired teaching methods are disliked.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Examining the university's performance reveals a diverse set of scores. The strongest areas are **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving very high marks. **Student Life** stands out as the weakest performing category. Other areas like **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Facilities** received solid, above-average ratings, with **Value** also scoring positively.

This institution garners strong approval across multiple aspects, with particularly high marks for its **Professors (4.76)** and **Location (4.75)**. Student life and internationality also score well, above 4.5. **Accommodations (4.35)** received the lowest rating, though still generally positive, while facilities and value demonstrate solid, above-average performance.

Considering the provided scores, this institution excels in its **location**, boasting the highest rating. Student life and internationality are also significant strengths. However, **accommodation** received the lowest score, indicating an area for improvement. Overall, the university demonstrates strong performance in most aspects, with location being a standout feature.

This institution garners positive feedback across several key areas, with **Professors** receiving the highest marks at 4.38. **Value** also scores very well at 4.28. The university demonstrates a solid standing in **Location** (4.14) and **Internationality** (4.09), with **Facilities** also rated favorably at 4.07. **Student Life** is rated at 3.94, while **Accomodation** presents the lowest score at 3.59.

This institution demonstrates strong performance, particularly in its Location and Internationality, both scoring an excellent 4.5. Student Life, Facilities, and Professors also receive commendably high marks at 4.25. Accomodation stands out as a slightly less strong area with a rating of 4, while Value also scores highly at 4.5.

Across numerous metrics, this institution demonstrates exceptional strengths. Facilities, professors, location, student life, and internationality all garnered perfect scores, indicating outstanding offerings in these domains. The sole area falling slightly short, though still very strong, is accommodation at 4.5 stars, suggesting a minor area for potential enhancement compared to its otherwise flawless performance.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 96.6% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable professors, supportive learning environments, and strong academic reputations. A small percentage (around 3.4%) of negative feedback cites issues with lecturing, grading, and course structure.

All 21 reviews are positive, averaging 4.76/5 stars. Students frequently praised helpful teachers, strong academic support, and good facilities. Some also highlighted a positive transition experience and newfound confidence.

With ~93% positive feedback from 139 reviews, students praise the welcoming atmosphere, strong employability focus, and helpful staff. A single negative review cited a lack of "hard facts" in the program.

With a 4.38/5 average rating from 39 reviews, ~97% of students expressed positive experiences. Praised themes include excellent courses, supportive lecturers, and a welcoming environment. A single negative review highlighted administrative issues.

University reviews are predominantly positive (~75%), with students highlighting helpful teachers and insightful modules. The student experience is described as memorable and well-supported. No negative feedback was provided.

Both reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Key highlights include excellent tutors, engaging daily webinars, and improved trading profitability. Students appreciated the supportive learning environment that clarified market understanding.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
34%
76%
52%
56%
50%
100%
0%
4★
44%
24%
40%
31%
25%
0%
0%
3★
18%
0%
8%
10%
25%
0%
0%
2★
2%
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
0%
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Great Experience

LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close