Edinburgh Napier University vs The University of Edinburgh vs Heriot-Watt University - HW vs Edinburgh College vs Queen Margaret University - QMU

Side-by-side comparison from 403 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Edinburgh Napier University: wins 0/6 categories
The University of Edinburgh: wins 0/6 categories
Heriot-Watt University - HW: wins 0/6 categories
Edinburgh College: wins 0/6 categories
Queen Margaret University - QMU: wins 0/6 categories
Edinburgh Business School: wins 3/6 categories
General Assembly: wins 3/6 categories
Comparing
Edinburgh, The United Kingdom
4.10
Read more reviews
47 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Management
Edinburgh, The United Kingdom
4.30
Read more reviews
128 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Science
Edinburgh, The United Kingdom
4.00
Read more reviews
208 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Edinburgh, The United Kingdom
4.70
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Tourism and Events Management
Edinburgh, The United Kingdom
4.20
Read more reviews
15 reviews
×
Best programme: BSc Psychology
Edinburgh, The United Kingdom
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration
New York City, United States
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Marketing
Category ratings
Facilities
4.31
4.34
3.87
4.67
3.77
4.00
5.00
Win
Location
4.18
4.78
3.45
3.33
3.87
5.00
5.00
Professors
4.18
4.21
4.09
4.67
3.98
5.00
Win
4.00
Internationality
4.15
4.52
3.78
2.67
4.07
5.00
Win
3.00
Student life
4.18
4.43
3.80
3.67
3.69
4.00
5.00
Win
Value
4.03
4.01
3.85
4.33
3.99
5.00
Win
4.00
Accommodation
3.67
3.87
3.61
2.67
4.10
3.00
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Industry-focused curriculum with practical skills
  • +Supportive and approachable faculty
  • +Well-structured programs and learning environment
  • +Engaging and knowledgeable faculty.
  • +Vibrant community and social opportunities.
  • +Academic growth and valuable experiences.
  • +Supportive and approachable staff and technical teams
  • +Valuable and recognized academic programmes with international recognition
  • +Opportunities for personal and professional growth through projects and societies
  • +Supportive staff and welcoming campus environment
  • +Engaging and relevant course content for career goals
  • +Accessible education for diverse student backgrounds
  • +Integrated social justice and ethical focus in curriculum
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable staff dedicated to student success
  • +Practical, well-structured programmes with modern facilities
  • +Practical business knowledge focus
  • +Accessible, self-study friendly modules
  • +Flexible distance learning and networking
  • +Knowledgeable, supportive professors
  • +Abundant study resources and learning activities
  • +Networking opportunities
Cons
  • -Unapproachable and neglectful lecturers.
  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Lack of program improvement and unmet expectations.
  • -High costs and limited ethnic diversity.
  • -University relying on prestige over student experience enhancements.
  • -Poor teaching quality and lack of academic support result in unhelpful education.
  • -Insufficient or outdated facilities hinder learning and career development opportunities.
  • -Administrative issues and lack of clear direction create a confusing and negative experience.
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Students find the facilities outdated and insufficient.
  • -Students are frustrated by the lack of resources and support.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and unresponsiveness from staff create a negative experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources detract from the learning experience.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support creates uncertainty.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources.
  • -Poor communication and administrative issues.
  • -Lack of practical application and relevant curriculum.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution achieves strong scores in several key areas, notably in **Facilities**, which stands out with the highest rating. Student life and location also received commendations, alongside professors and internationality, all scoring above 4.0. The weakest area highlighted is **Accommodation**, receiving the lowest rating among the surveyed categories. Overall, the university presents a generally positive picture, with room for improvement in its housing provisions.

This institution garners strong acclaim, particularly for its **Location**, which received the highest rating. Student Life and Internationality also scored very well. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents as the weakest area, with a notably lower score compared to other aspects. Facilities, Professors, and Value fall within a respectable middle range.

A comprehensive assessment reveals a university with generally positive feedback. Professors are a standout strength, earning the highest score. In contrast, the location received the lowest rating among the surveyed aspects. Other areas like facilities, student life, internationality, and value also scored well, demonstrating a solid overall performance. Accommodations also received a respectable, though not top-tier, evaluation.

Regarding the university's performance, it excels in its **facilities** and the **quality of its professors**, both receiving high marks. The **value** for students is also a significant positive. However, areas that require attention include **accommodation** and **internationality**, which are rated considerably lower. **Location** and **student life** fall in the middle range of the evaluations.

Across several key areas, this university demonstrates a generally positive reception. Accommodation stands out as its strongest point, receiving a near-perfect score. Conversely, student life is rated the lowest among the surveyed categories. Professors and value are also highly regarded, alongside internationality. Location and facilities show solid, mid-range performance.

This institution garners strong marks, particularly excelling in its **Professors, Location, Internationality, and Value**, all receiving perfect scores. Facilities and Student Life are also well-regarded with solid ratings. The weakest area identified is **Accomodation**, which received a moderate rating. Overall, the university presents a very attractive package, especially for those prioritizing faculty quality, geographic convenience, global engagement, and cost-effectiveness.

Overall, this institution garners strong commendations, particularly excelling in its facilities, location, student life, and accommodation, all receiving perfect scores. Professors and perceived value also score well, indicating solid academic and financial offerings. The weakest area identified is internationality, suggesting room for growth in attracting and supporting a global student body.

Reviews summary
Highlights

~98% of 47 reviews are positive, highlighting supportive lecturers, practical and career-focused courses, and a well-structured learning environment. One negative review mentioned unapproachable lecturers.

With a 4.3/5 average rating from 129 reviews, ~84% are positive, highlighting engaging lectures, supportive faculty, and ample opportunities. A single negative review (~0.8%) noted program limitations and limited ethnic diversity.

Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting good professors, valuable learning, and supportive staff. A small ~1.9% of feedback mentions a lack of course support and teaching, or career/internship opportunities.

With a high average rating of 4.67/5, student feedback is ~100% positive. Recurring themes highlight supportive and helpful staff, quality education, and accessible learning environments.

With an average rating of 4.19/5 and 14 out of 16 reviews being positive (~88%), students praise supportive and knowledgeable staff, relevant and engaging content, and a focus on social justice and well-being. Minimal negative feedback was noted.

With a 5/5 average rating from one review, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Positive aspects include appreciating practical business knowledge and well-developed modules suitable for self-study and distance learning. No negative feedback was recorded.

With a single review, this university is rated a perfect 5/5. The student highlighted excellent professors and abundant study resources. No negative feedback was received.

Rating distribution
5★
32%
47%
26%
67%
33%
100%
100%
4★
55%
38%
51%
33%
60%
0%
0%
3★
11%
15%
21%
0%
13%
0%
0%
2★
0%
1%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Undergraduate Law

This university is welcoming and continually helpful by staff and pupils. I would recommend this university to new students. The law degree I am currently studying is exactly what I expected and is also very enjoyable.

Great support from personal tutor and supervisor!

Overall the university is good, they have an easy way to apply for extensions on coursework, and special circumstances, which my personal tutor was more than happy to help with, she really was the best. My supervisor for my dissertation was also really supportive and helped through the challenging times. The lecturers are usually helpful if you are stuck, but there were some who would do the bare minimum for the students.

The campus

Love Heriot Watt! I’ve been studying in the Dubai campus and I’ve now transferred to the Edinburgh one and it’s amazing! The campus has many useful facilities and there always creative events taking place for students to interact.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close