University of New York in Prague - UNYP vs University of Chemistry and Technology of Prague vs Charles University vs Rochester Institute of Technology - RIT vs European Summer School
Side-by-side comparison from 166 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Personal, individual, and supportive student approach
- +Engaging, practical, and critical thinking-focused classes
- +Knowledgeable professors with real-world expertise
- +Supportive faculty and program flexibility
- +Practical, hands-on learning with excellent labs and equipment
- +Strong community and international student experience
- +Passionate and expert professors
- +Numerous academic and extracurricular opportunities
- +Diverse and international environment
- +Supportive faculty and engaging academic environment
- +Modern facilities and vibrant campus life
- +Welcoming atmosphere and diverse community
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of essential resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and unresponsiveness from instructors are major concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are commonly criticized.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and poorly delivered.
- -Poor student treatment and high failure rates.
- -Discriminatory practices towards international students.
- -Lack of fair assessment opportunities.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a common complaint.
- -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts the learning experience.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution performs exceptionally well in **location**, boasting a near-perfect score. **Student life** and **internationality** also received very high marks. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated category. Other areas like **facilities**, **professors**, and **value** received solid, positive scores, indicating a generally well-regarded university experience.
The university's location received the highest marks, with a score of 4.7, followed closely by facilities and accommodation, both at 4.27. Areas for improvement include internationality, which scored 3.82, making it the weakest surveyed category. Student life and value for money were rated at a solid 4.
Overall, the university demonstrates robust performance in several key areas. Professors and location receive particularly high marks, alongside strong scores for student life and internationality. Value is also rated favorably. The weakest areas, though still respectable, are facilities and accommodation.
Across key metrics, this institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Professors** and **Internationality**, both receiving scores above 4.35. **Student Life** also garners excellent feedback, close behind. Conversely, the **Location** receives the lowest rating among the surveyed areas. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Accomodation**, and **Value** fall within a good, solid range, indicating a generally positive but varied student experience.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
All 46 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.65/5. Students praise the personal approach, engaging and practical classes, and supportive, knowledgeable professors.
Nine out of ten reviews are positive, highlighting enriching experiences, skilled faculty, and practical, research-oriented programs. Some mention demanding courses and occasional English communication barriers from instructors.
Over 97% of reviews are positive, praising excellent professors and numerous academic/extracurricular opportunities. A small fraction of feedback (~3%) mentions poor student treatment and unfair academic progression.
With an average rating of 4.18/5 from 39 reviews, approximately 93% of feedback is highly positive. Students frequently praise academic rigor, faculty support, modern facilities, and a vibrant campus life. No negative reviews were recorded.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I really like UNYP because the teachers are so enthusiastic about the subjects they teach. Generally, most of the lessons were very interesting and engaging, and I truly enjoyed them. The teachers are experts in their respective fields, and it's always fun to talk to them about research and ideas. Additionally, I would really like to point out the opportunities, general contacts and experiences in psychology!
Nothing to show
My name is Bashar Ali, I am a medicine student in the first year. Today I am going to share my experience in Charles university. As a new student I was confused at the beginning of the year but after not long time I got used to the university system and the university stuff was very helpful starting from professional and nice teachers and ending with office employees. For me the academic side was perfect and my experience was very good. The university provide us with valuable information and we can find a lot of different students from different parts of the world so we can meet people from different cultures. I lived in the dorms and for me it was good because it was safe, clean and cheap. Now I am very happy in my studies especially that the university degree is recognized all over the world in addition that it is one of the highest ranking in the world in conclusion, Charles University offers a world-class medical education that combines rigorous academics, exceptional clinical training, and abundant research opportunities
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
