Paris-Dauphine University vs Rennes School of Business vs emlyon business school vs SKEMA Business School vs Audencia Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 300 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong academic reputation and focused learning environment
- +Supportive faculty and engaging teaching quality
- +Excellent career opportunities and international exposure
- +Practical and real-world focused learning
- +International and experienced faculty
- +Welcoming and diverse community
- +Practical and international programs with diverse students
- +Valuable professional experience through internships and work-study
- +Supportive environment for personal and professional development
- +Practical, skill-building programs with industry relevance
- +Supportive and interactive faculty and staff
- +Rich extracurricular activities and networking opportunities
- +Supportive learning environment with good teachers and diverse international community.
- +Excellent facilities and well-designed courses catering to professionals.
- +Ideal student city with good amenities and student-friendly scheduling.
- +Supportive and inclusive learning environment
- +Practical and applied learning methods
- +Vibrant student life and international opportunities
- +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
- +Opportunities for personal and career growth
- +Supportive and organized academic environment
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a common complaint.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and ineffective curriculum are also disliked.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant problem.
- -Poor English communication and support for international students are prevalent.
- -Lack of adequate facilities and resources are noted.
- -Lack of practical value and shallow content in courses.
- -Unfair and frustrating grading, especially for group projects.
- -Disappointing professor engagement and program support.
- -Administrative & management issues, including poor communication and exam/result mismanagement.
- -Concerns about financial focus over student well-being and discrimination.
- -Unorganized programs and overwhelming course loads with varied evaluations.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of practical tool training.
- -Unsupportive professors who dismiss constructive criticism.
- -Limited opportunities for student interaction and networking.
- -Unprepared and unhelpful professors.
- -Irrelevant courses and outdated curriculum.
- -Poor organization and administrative issues.
- -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities.
- -Poor quality of facilities and overall environment.
- -Lack of academic rigor and student engagement.
Reviewing the provided ratings reveals a generally positive assessment of the institution. Student life stands out as the strongest area, achieving the highest score. Conversely, facilities received the lowest rating, indicating a potential area for improvement. Other aspects, including professors, location, accommodation, internationality, and value, all scored commendably, contributing to a well-rounded university experience.
Student feedback indicates a generally positive university experience, with Student Life (4.35) and Internationality (4.32) emerging as particularly strong aspects. Professors (4.22) and Location (4.25) also received high marks. The weakest area identified is Accomodation, scoring 3.75, while Facilities are rated at 4.03. Value for money is also well-regarded at 4.11.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in its internationality and location, both scoring above 4.5. Student life and value also received positive marks, exceeding 4.2 and 4.4 respectively. However, accommodation presents as the weakest area, with the lowest rating of approximately 3.94. Facilities and professors also received solid, though slightly lower, scores in comparison.
This university garners strong ratings across several key areas, with **Professors** and **Internationality** standing out as exceptional strengths. Students also appreciate the **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Student Life**. The **Value** offering is also well-regarded. The **Accomodation** category received the lowest score, indicating a potential area for improvement.
This institution garners high marks in several key areas, with Internationality standing out as its strongest point. Professors and Value also received commendations. Areas for potential improvement include Accomodation, which presents as the weakest rated aspect, followed by Facilities. Student Life and Location are rated well, indicating a generally positive student experience.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in its **location**, scoring an impressive 4.33, and in **student life** at 4.24. Ratings for professors and internationality are also solid. The weakest area appears to be **accommodation**, receiving a score of 3.5. Overall, the university presents a generally positive picture with room for improvement in specific aspects.
The university exhibits exceptional strengths in its location and internationality, both scoring a near-perfect 4.93. Professors also receive high marks at 4.64, complemented by strong student life (4.15) and value (4.29). The weakest areas are facilities, rated at 3.92, and accommodation, which received a 3.62.
All 10 reviews are positive, averaging 4.5/5 stars. Students highlight rewarding academic journeys, intellectually engaging environments, and supportive faculty. Career opportunities and strong program reputation are frequently praised.
University reviews are largely positive (~97%), highlighting strong teaching methods, practical learning, and professional development opportunities. A small amount of feedback mentions struggles with language barriers for international students.
The vast majority of university students have a positive experience, highlighting academic rigor, practical learning, and international environments. A small fraction of reviews mention disappointment with course content and grading.
Around 97.3% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical skills, career development, and enriching international experiences. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions program disorganization and communication issues.
University reviews are highly positive (~94%), highlighting a great learning environment, good facilities, and an international student community. A small portion (~6%) expressed disappointment with practical training and professor availability.
With a 3.91/5 average, ~74% of 22 reviews are positive, praising helpful staff, enjoyable campus life, and practical teaching. Two negative reviews (9.1%) cited unprepared professors and irrelevant courses.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 13 out of 14 (93%) giving high ratings. Students praise the diverse educators and peer networks, cultural exposure, and opportunities for personal and academic growth. A small percentage of feedback (around 7%) mentions a lack of extracurricular activities and internship availability for earlier years.
Paris Dauphine is indeed recognized worldwide for its teaching in organizational and market sciences. This is why one can specialize in many interesting fields such as Finance or Marketing. It is also the case for the numerous research works it has been able to carry out. So, I love my University and I would recommend it very strongly.
The school stands out as an exemplary institution with commendable features. The accommodation facilities are not only comfortable but also designed to foster a conducive learning environment. The faculty comprises diverse, highly qualified educators, ensuring a high standard of education. The emphasis on practical learning prepares students effectively for real-world scenarios. The institution offers a top-notch academic experience combined with excellent living standards, making it a highly recommended choice for those seeking quality education.
Nothing to show
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
I have been quite satisfied by the quality of teaching at Audencia. The lecturers and professors are knowledgeable and place an emphasis on professionalism and leveraging culture in business dealings.
Overall, I had a positive experience at ESSCA. The programme is well organized and provides a solid foundation in business and management. The courses were generally of good quality and covered a broad range of topics, helping students develop both academic knowledge and practical skills. One of the aspects I appreciated most was the international exchange during the third year. ESSCA has a good network of partner universities, and the opportunity to study abroad was a valuable part of the programme. Student life is also a real strength of the school. The associative environment is active and offers many opportunities to get involved outside the classroom, meet new people, and gain additional experience. Like any programme, some courses were more engaging than others, but overall I found the experience enriching and would recommend it to students looking for a business school with a strong international dimension and a good balance between academics and extracurricular activities.
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
