Sciences Po vs Mines School of Nancy - ESMN vs ICN Business School vs Université de Lorraine vs École Nationale Supérieure d'Agronomie et des Industries Alimentaire - ENSAIA
Side-by-side comparison from 61 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Interdisciplinary curriculum with practical applications
- +Networking opportunities and vibrant student life
- +Prestigious institution with accomplished faculty
- +Talented teachers and students
- +Good city for student life and focus
- +Strong school name and brand
- +Diverse and international student body
- +Affordable and convenient programs
- +Strong academic reputation and programs
- +Exceptional academic programs and quality education
- +Supportive and approachable faculty and researchers
- +Lively campus with good opportunities for personal and professional growth
- +Clear program specialization after common core
- +Focused agricultural and food industry engineering education
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and academic methods.
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of preparation.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources detract from the learning experience.
- -Course content and teaching quality are often criticized as subpar.
- -Excessive administrative and management issues hinder progress.
- -Outdated facilities and technology create an unpleasant learning environment.
- -Inconsistent and unclear communication from instructors and the institution causes frustration.
- -Administrative and management issues caused significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources were frequently mentioned.
- -Poor communication and unclear expectations led to dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of transparency are prevalent concerns.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Internationality and location stand out as the university's strongest attributes, receiving exceptional ratings. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest area, scoring significantly lower than other categories. Professors, student life, and value are all rated positively, indicating a well-rounded experience, though facilities fall in the middle ground.
A uniformly average rating across all categories indicates a consistent, though unremarkable, university experience. The institution scores a neutral 0 in Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value. No particular strengths or weaknesses are evident, suggesting a middle-of-the-road offering that meets basic expectations without excelling in any specific area.
Overall, this institution receives positive evaluations, with its **location** standing out as a significant strength, achieving the highest rating. Facilities and student life also scored well, both at 4. Accommodations are a slightly weaker point, rated at 3.5, while the ratings for professors and internationality are comparable and solid.
This university garners exceptional ratings for its professors, who received a high score of 4.33. Location and student life also score well at 4. Conversely, the institution's weakest areas are internationality and value, both averaging 3.44. Facilities and accommodation present a middle ground with scores around 3.7.
With excellent ratings in accommodation and strong showings in professors and student life, this institution presents a positive picture. Its weakest areas appear to be in facilities and internationality, both receiving moderate scores. The overall value is well-regarded, suggesting a solid educational investment despite some room for improvement in physical resources and global engagement.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Around 96% of reviews are positive, highlighting interdisciplinary education, strong academics, and vibrant student life. A small percentage (~4%) express concerns about teaching methods and academic staff preparation.
With a 4/5 average rating, this university receives predominantly positive feedback. Students highlight talented teachers and a balanced city environment conducive to both studies and social life. No negative reviews were recorded.
With an average rating of 4.33/5, positive feedback (~100%) highlights diversity, affordability, and strong alumni networks. Students also recommend it for rigorous programs and convenient international student support.
All nine reviews are positive, giving an average rating of 4.11/5. Students praise the excellent research environment, high-quality education, and approachable, supportive faculty. The diversity of programs is also a recurring positive theme.
This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~100% of reviews being favorable. Students appreciate the clear specialization options in agronomy and agrifood, allowing informed career choices.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I'm an exchange student in the Reims campus in the academic year of 2023-2024. I think this campus is good for an exchange experience because there are a lot of exchange students and even the french people who come to the grad school don't live in Reims, so basically everyone on the campus is new to the city and wants to form a bond. In terms of academic experience, I think Sciences Po system is really controlling. Their attendance policy is really strict and all the classes have an assignment for the week, either a presentation or an evaluation, which makes the semester exhausting since the beginning. Also, I didn't like the fact that in some classes there are only presentations made by students and no later explanation by the professor. I don't like this method because I think the students only focus on preparing their presentation and we don't really pay attention to the presentation of the other classmates as much as we would pay as if the professor was presenting. To summarize, I still love some of my classes, but I had higher expectations about Sciences Po's method, since it's the best political sciences university in Europe, which made me a little disappointed.
Nothing to show
First of all, the courses taught in this course are of high quality, partly due to the quality of the speakers in the school. The courses are complete and are in line with current trends. However, the speakers were not all very qualitative, whether in terms of communicating the homework to be done or their lessons. Overall the program is open to international but having been educated at the time of the COVID-19 epidemic, I could not get an idea of the international side of this school. Thus, the Bachelor's at ICN Business School is a fairly versatile course, focused on the different areas that can be found in management (communication, accounting, CV creation workshops and cover letters, etc.) Concerning opportunities, because of the partnerships that the school maintains with many large companies, I find that it is simple having gone through this school to apply for and obtain a work contract, both in France and abroad. the international.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
