SKEMA Business School vs EDHEC Business School vs Excelia Business School vs Strate School of Design vs ESSCA School of Management

Side-by-side comparison from 265 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Schiller International University (4.60)
SKEMA Business School: wins 0/7 categories
EDHEC Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Excelia Business School: wins 1/7 categories
Strate School of Design: wins 0/7 categories
ESSCA School of Management: wins 0/7 categories
Schiller International University: wins 3/7 categories
Ecole des Ponts Business School: wins 3/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Supply Chain Management
Best programme: Business Administration in Management
La Rochelle, France
4.20
Read more reviews
42 reviews
×
Best programme: Master of Science (MSc)
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: International Business
Tampa, Florida, United States
4.60
Top
Read more reviews
14 reviews
×
Best programme: BA International Relations and Diplomacy
Best programme: AI in Project Management
Category ratings
Facilities
4.22
4.20
4.13
Not rated
3.84
3.92
4.33
Win
Location
4.24
3.73
4.31
Not rated
4.33
4.93
Win
4.33
Professors
4.41
4.32
4.02
Not rated
3.95
4.64
4.75
Win
Internationality
4.37
4.41
4.38
Not rated
3.79
4.93
5.00
Win
Student life
4.14
4.14
4.37
Win
Not rated
4.28
4.15
4.33
Value
4.04
4.05
4.04
Not rated
3.74
4.29
Win
4.25
Accommodation
3.57
3.14
3.59
Not rated
3.42
3.62
Win
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Engaging faculty with practical industry insights
  • +Vibrant campus life and networking opportunities
  • +International exposure and diverse student community
  • +Rigorous academic and practical preparation for careers
  • +Strong alumni network and career services support
  • +International exposure and diverse student body
  • +Strong academic programs and quality teaching
  • +Excellent student support and career integration focus
  • +International environment and diverse student body

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive and practical learning environment
  • +Vibrant student life and activities
  • +International and diverse community
  • +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
  • +Opportunities for personal and career growth
  • +Supportive and organized academic environment
  • +Market-relevant skills leading to career advancement
  • +High-quality, competent faculty and engaging learning experiences
  • +Supportive and friendly community atmosphere
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause poor communication and disorganization.
  • -Concerns exist regarding discriminatory practices and profit-driven focus over student well-being.
  • -Ineffective teaching faculty and an overwhelming, poorly structured academic program are criticized.
  • -High tuition fees and perceived low return on investment.
  • -Mismatched course content to student expectations
  • -Lack of career support services like internships and apprenticeships
  • -Unprofessional training perceived as poor value for tuition cost

Nothing to show

  • -Poor professor preparedness and teaching quality
  • -Irrelevant and expensive courses
  • -Disorganized administration
  • -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities.
  • -Poor quality of facilities and overall environment.
  • -Lack of academic rigor and student engagement.
  • -Inconsistent and unreliable administrative and management issues
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities and resources
  • -Lack of effective communication and support from faculty and staff
Rating summary
What students say

This university demonstrates a solid reputation across multiple facets, with particularly strong showings in its **Professors (4.41)** and **Internationality (4.37)**. Ratings for Facilities, Location, and Student Life are also commendable, all exceeding 4.0. The primary area for improvement identified is **Accomodation**, receiving the lowest score at 3.57, while Value also sits below the 4.0 mark.

Academic and student experience aspects generally receive positive marks, with **Internationality** standing out as the strongest area with a rating of 4.41. Professors and Facilities are also highly rated. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area at 3.14, indicating room for improvement in this regard. Location and Student Life are moderately rated, suggesting a solid but not exceptional experience in those domains.

Assessing university performance reveals notable strengths in internationality, student life, and location, all scoring above 4.3. Internationality stands out as the highest-rated aspect. Conversely, accommodation presents a comparative weakness, with a rating of 3.59. Facilities, professors, and value also received solid scores in the low 4.0 range.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its Location and Student Life, both receiving high marks. Conversely, Accomodation presents as the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating compared to other aspects. Other surveyed categories, including Facilities, Professors, Internationality, and Value, fall within a moderate range, indicating generally satisfactory performance.

The university exhibits exceptional strengths in its location and internationality, both scoring a near-perfect 4.93. Professors also receive high marks at 4.64, complemented by strong student life (4.15) and value (4.29). The weakest areas are facilities, rated at 3.92, and accommodation, which received a 3.62.

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its faculty and international student experience, both scoring a near-perfect 4.8. Facilities and location also received high marks at 4.5. Student life and perceived value are positive at 4.25 and 4.2 respectively. The primary area for improvement, however, lies in accommodation, which received the lowest rating of 3.67.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.36 average rating, ~91% of 143 reviews are positive, highlighting enriching faculty, career support, and vibrant campus life. A small minority of ~2.8% experienced poor communication and organization.

With a 4.24/5 average, ~98% of reviews are positive, highlighting intense courses, strong alumni networks, and excellent career services. A small percentage of feedback mentioned high tuition fees.

The vast majority of ~95% of university student reviews are positive, citing strong programs, quality teaching, and good career preparation. A small percentage (~5%) of feedback mentions programs not meeting expectations or concerns about training value relative to cost.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3.89, roughly 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting helpful staff, enjoyable campus life, and practical learning. A small percentage of feedback noted unprepared professors and irrelevant coursework.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 13 out of 14 (93%) giving high ratings. Students praise the diverse educators and peer networks, cultural exposure, and opportunities for personal and academic growth. A small percentage of feedback (around 7%) mentions a lack of extracurricular activities and internship availability for earlier years.

All 5 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.4/5. Students highlight career advancements and valuable market skills gained. They also praise high-quality courses, competent professors, and engaging events.

Rating distribution
5★
49%
39%
38%
0%
32%
71%
50%
4★
42%
52%
50%
0%
42%
21%
50%
3★
6%
9%
7%
0%
16%
0%
0%
2★
1%
2%
2%
0%
5%
7%
0%
1★
1%
0%
2%
0%
5%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Experience in School

My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.

Enriching Experience

I absolutely love everything about EDHEC, beginning from the pedagogy to the atmosphere it provides to the students (especially international) on campus. The extracurricular activities like sports, associations are very helpful. Also, the career service provided is top-notch. Therefore, I would call it an enriching experience so far.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Well-rounded programme

Overall, I had a positive experience at ESSCA. The programme is well organized and provides a solid foundation in business and management. The courses were generally of good quality and covered a broad range of topics, helping students develop both academic knowledge and practical skills. One of the aspects I appreciated most was the international exchange during the third year. ESSCA has a good network of partner universities, and the opportunity to study abroad was a valuable part of the programme. Student life is also a real strength of the school. The associative environment is active and offers many opportunities to get involved outside the classroom, meet new people, and gain additional experience. Like any programme, some courses were more engaging than others, but overall I found the experience enriching and would recommend it to students looking for a business school with a strong international dimension and a good balance between academics and extracurricular activities.

The cultural mix and the great atmosphere.

I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close