Mediterranean University vs Universidad en Línea - UTEL vs University of Konstanz vs University of Montenegro vs University of Donja Gorica - UDG

Side-by-side comparison from 18 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Mediterranean University (5.00)
Mediterranean University: wins 0/4 categories
Universidad en Línea - UTEL: wins 0/4 categories
University of Konstanz: wins 0/4 categories
University of Montenegro: wins 1/4 categories
University of Donja Gorica - UDG: wins 0/4 categories
Brighton Metropolitan College - MET: wins 3/4 categories
Minia University - جامعة المنيا: wins 0/4 categories
Comparing
Podgorica, Montenegro
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Engineering of Computing Systems
Best programme: Economics and Business
Podgorica, Montenegro
3.60
Read more reviews
8 reviews
×
Best programme: Electrical Engineering
Best programme: Computational and Applied Mathematics
Brighton, The United Kingdom
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Graphic Design
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
3.67
3.50
3.25
4.00
4.00
3.00
Location
Not rated
4.67
4.50
4.29
2.50
5.00
Win
4.00
Professors
Not rated
4.33
3.00
4.13
4.50
5.00
Win
4.00
Internationality
Not rated
3.67
3.00
2.63
3.00
5.00
Win
4.00
Student life
Not rated
3.67
4.00
3.75
3.50
3.00
4.00
Value
Not rated
3.67
4.00
4.00
4.00
5.00
5.00
Accommodation
Not rated
3.33
3.00
3.75
Win
3.50
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Interactive classes and professor engagement
  • +Small class sizes and organized faculty
  • +Faculty support and communication
  • +Expert professors and practical career knowledge
  • +Flexible online learning options
  • +Valuable skill development and enriching experience
  • +Idyllic campus location for stress relief
  • +Engaging professors with real-world experience.
  • +Comprehensive curriculum offering theoretical and practical knowledge.
  • +Authentic cultural and historical learning experiences.
  • +strong curriculum balance
  • +dedicated and supportive faculty
  • +opportunities for practical experience
  • +Supportive staff and ample learning opportunities
  • +Positive academic and social experiences
  • +High program standards and helpful guidance

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently cited problems.
  • -A lack of effective communication and support is a recurring concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
  • -Lack of practical application and insufficient support hinder learning.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources create significant frustration.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or not practical enough.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Inflexible policies and poor communication are significant problems.
  • -Administrative and management issues create unnecessary stress.
  • -Outdated facilities hinder effective learning and research.
  • -Lack of clear communication and transparency causes confusion.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Course content and teaching methods lack relevance and engagement.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Across all surveyed categories, this institution received ratings of zero. This indicates no discernible strengths or weaknesses within the areas of facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, or value. The uniform zero scores suggest a need for comprehensive review and development in every aspect of the university's offerings.

Across several key areas, this institution demonstrates notable strengths. Its location and professors are particularly well-regarded, receiving the highest ratings. Conversely, accommodation emerges as the weakest point, scoring lowest among the surveyed categories. Other aspects like facilities, student life, internationality, and value are rated moderately, suggesting areas for potential improvement while maintaining a generally positive standing.

Location and student life stand out with strong scores of 4.5 and 4 respectively. In contrast, accommodation and internationality received the lowest marks, both at 3. The university also scores moderately in facilities and professors, with value for money being a solid performer at 4.

This university is highly rated for its **location** (4.29) and **professors** (4.13), reflecting a positive academic and environmental experience. **Value** also scores well at 4.0. However, **internationality** is a notable area for improvement, receiving the lowest rating of 2.63. Other aspects like **student life** and **accommodations** are moderately rated at 3.75, with **facilities** at 3.25.

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in its **professors**, earning a strong 4.5 rating. **Facilities** also score well at 4. However, the **location** presents a significant weakness, with a low rating of 2.5. Other areas such as student life, accommodation, and internationality fall into a moderate range, indicating room for improvement in certain aspects. The overall **value** is positively rated at 4.

An impressive performance is evident across several key areas, with **professors, location, internationality, and value all receiving perfect scores**. However, a significant weakness is highlighted by the complete absence of a rating for **accommodation**, while student life is rated moderately. Facilities also stand out with a strong, albeit not perfect, score.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~100% of reviews being favorable. Students highlight interactive classes and strong professor communication.

With an average rating of 4.33/5, ~67% of reviews are positive. Students highlight qualified professors and a positive online learning experience, including acquiring career-relevant knowledge and reinforcing computer skills. No negative reviews were recorded.

With an average rating of 3.5/5 based on two reviews, ~50% of feedback is positive. Students highlight the University of Konstanz's appealing location near a large lake and natural landscapes as a significant draw.

With 4 out of 8 reviews being positive (4-5 stars), students express happiness with their degree experience and comprehensive curricula. They also appreciate engaging professors and departments located in historically rich areas. Some wish for updated course content and more practical experience.

With a 3.5/5 average rating and ~50% positive feedback, students highlight a good balance of theory and practical skills, and supportive faculty. No negative feedback was recorded.

With a 4/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, students praise excellent staff and learning opportunities. Support and guidance are highlighted as particularly beneficial.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
100%
67%
0%
13%
0%
0%
0%
4★
0%
0%
50%
38%
50%
100%
0%
3★
0%
33%
50%
50%
50%
0%
100%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close