University Politehnica of Bucharest - UPB vs University of Bucharest - UB vs Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies - ASE vs Romanian-American University vs Romanian-American School Of Business - ASEBUSS
Side-by-side comparison from 209 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Abundant opportunities for professional and personal development.
- +Supportive and approachable professors who facilitate learning.
- +Strong engineering programs with industry interest.
- +Excellent learning and knowledgeable faculty
- +Strong student community and friendships
- +Enriching and valuable academic development
- +Supportive and knowledgeable professors
- +Strong, practical, and well-structured programs
- +Good career opportunities and academic reputation
- +Excellent, knowledgeable, and approachable professors.
- +Practical and well-structured courses with real-world application.
- +Numerous career, internship, and international exchange opportunities.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of student care are prevalent.
- -Outdated facilities and infrastructure are a significant problem.
- -Professors' lack of care and restrictive scheduling are major frustrations.
- -Administrative issues like late and insufficient scholarships are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and irrelevant curriculum.
- -Lack of student focus and prioritization.
- -Perceived as a money-making institution with poor value.
- -Constant and disruptive construction noise negatively impacts sleep and living conditions.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location**, scoring a high 4.2, and in **Student Life**, with a rating of 3.94. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area, receiving a score of 3.15. Other aspects like Professors, Internationality, and Value fall within a solid mid-range, indicating a generally positive but not exceptional performance in these categories.
This institution scores exceptionally well in **Location**, achieving a rating of 4.64. **Professors** also receive high marks at 4.15, closely followed by **Student Life** (4.08) and **Value** (4.08). Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the lowest score at 3.28, with **Facilities** also being a weaker area at 3.42. Ratings for **Internationality** fall in the middle range.
The university demonstrates a remarkably strong performance in its **Location**, achieving a score of 4.62. Student Life also received high marks at 4.39, with Accommodation and Value scoring favorably around 4.08 and 4.05 respectively. Conversely, **Facilities** emerged as the lowest-rated area, registering at 3.79. Professors and Internationality also fell within a similar mid-range, with scores of 3.89 and 3.80.
This institution demonstrates a well-rounded performance, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest attribute. Students also rated **Professors** highly. Areas for potential improvement include **Location** and **Accomodation**, which received the lowest scores. Other aspects like Facilities, Student Life, and Value fall within a solid mid-range.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting ample opportunities and supportive professors. A small fraction of negative feedback (~6%) points to system issues and inconsistent educational standards.
With an average rating of 4.28/5 from 40 reviews, ~74% are positive. Students highlight learning opportunities and forming friendships. Minimal negative feedback (~2.5%) cited uncaring professors and scheduling issues.
~98% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable and supportive professors, structured programs, and good career opportunities. A small ~2% of feedback mentioned outdated facilities and a perceived lack of student-focused administration.
With an average rating of 4.17/5, ~83% of reviews are positive. Students praise knowledgeable and approachable professors, well-structured curricula, and interactive teaching methods. One negative review mentioned disruptive drilling noise.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
My first year was excellent there, there are a lot of friends you can make and the professors really do help us. I remember going to class and joking about random things with them. The exams are pretty simple because you learn from the class, you don't need pretty much anything when you have people like these around you.
It's one of the most active National Universities in our Country located in the center of the Capital City. We had several practices during the Bachelor's and Master's degree. We gathered a lot of useful information and also combined knowledge with practical activities in different locations of the country in the environmental field. We managed to understand the environment and to share our knowledge to people around us but the main problem in our country is that the hiring opportunities in this field are very low. Could be just a national problem and maybe we didn't have the support from the University in order to follow our domain.
Overall, I had a very positive experience with the International Economics programme. The courses provided a solid understanding of global markets, trade, monetary policy, development, and the economic forces shaping international business The programme could still improve in terms of administration, communication, and consistency across courses. Some classes felt more practical and engaging than others.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
