Uppsala University vs Royal Institute of Technology - KTH vs University of Gothenburg vs Umea University - UMU vs Malmö University - MAU
Side-by-side comparison from 90 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High-quality education and research-driven learning
- +Friendly and knowledgeable academic and non-academic staff
- +Practical, real-life learning experiences and student-centered guidance
- +World-class facilities and inspiring study atmosphere
- +Strong academic programs with practical application and flexibility
- +Engaging and approachable instructors
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
- +Well-equipped research environments and facilities
- +Interesting and well-organized programs
- +Excellent teachers and engaging student life.
- +Pleasant and convenient location and facilities.
- +Positive international atmosphere and good university reputation.
- +Supportive and approachable professors
- +Relevant and forward-thinking curriculum
- +Diverse and inclusive learning environment
- +University's quality and campus facilities.
- +Hands-on, immersive, and creative learning with freedom to shape studies.
- +Direct industry insights and practical application from experienced professionals.
- +Strong focus on building relationships with driven, like-minded peers.
- -Negative peer attitudes and lack of collaboration hinder learning.
- -Disappointing program quality and instructor approach.
- -Student disinterest and sabotage of work.
- -Administrative & management issues frustrate students.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
- -Lack of resources and support hinder learning.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a persistent problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and organizational issues from the administration frustrate students.
- -Course content and teaching quality are often seen as inadequate or uninspiring.
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor resources detract from learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a problem.
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Outdated facilities and resources
- -Misaligned curriculum and teaching methods
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a significant drawback.
- -Lack of effective communication and unclear expectations are problematic.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a problem.
- -Course content and teaching quality often fall short of expectations.
Examining the university's performance reveals a strong showing in academic and campus-related aspects. Professors (4.15) and Facilities (4.10) received particularly high marks. Student Life (4.08) and Internationality (4.00) also scored well. Conversely, the university's Location (3.66) and Accomodation (3.68) represent areas for potential improvement, while Value (3.98) falls in the mid-range.
Exceptional marks were awarded in several key areas, notably a perfect score for **Internationality**. **Facilities** and **Value** also received very high ratings. The university performs well across **Student Life** and **Accomodation**, with solid scores for **Professors** and **Location**. While no area received a low rating, **Location** represents the comparatively weakest aspect among the surveyed categories.
This institution garners exceptional marks for its location, boasting a rating of 4.86. Facilities and internationality are also highly regarded, both scoring 4.71. Professors receive a solid 4.57, and the overall value is rated at 4.29. Student life scores a respectable 4. The weakest area by a significant margin is accommodation, with a score of just 2.86.
This institution garners exceptionally high marks for its Facilities, Student Life, Internationality, and perceived Value, all receiving a near-perfect score. Professors are also rated favorably, while Location scores a solid 4. The primary area for improvement seems to be Accomodation, which received the lowest rating of 3.67.
Analyzing the university's performance reveals a mixed but generally positive picture. The institution excels in its **Internationality** (3.95) and **Professors** (4), indicating strong global engagement and a well-regarded academic staff. Conversely, **Accomodation** (3.23) presents the lowest score, suggesting room for improvement in this area. Other aspects like Facilities, Location, Student Life, and Value fall within a moderate range.
This institution presents a mixed rating profile. Its strongest areas include professors and value, both receiving a solid 3.5. Conversely, accommodation stands out as the weakest point, scoring a low 2. Facilities and internationality are rated moderately at 2.5, while location and student life achieve a respectable 3.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths, with perfect scores in Facilities, Location, Student Life, and Value. Professors and Internationality also received high marks, rated at 4 and 4.5 respectively. Accomodation stands out as the comparatively weakest area, though still very good at 4.5, reflecting a generally positive and well-rounded university experience.
With 43 reviews, ~98% are positive, praising academic excellence, quality education, and friendly staff. One review expressed disappointment with a specific course's peer and instructor attitudes.
All 12 reviews are positive, averaging 4.75/5. Students praise world-class research facilities, inclusive culture, and opportunities for theory-practice integration. Friendly, engaging instructors and diverse, flexible courses are also highlighted.
With a 4.71/5 average rating from 7 reviews, students report overwhelmingly positive experiences, highlighting exceptional faculty and enriching academic environments. No negative feedback was recorded.
With an average rating of 4.67/5, all three student reviews were positive. Recurring themes highlighted good teachers, great student life, and convenient facilities. No negative feedback was provided.
Most students (~74%) praise Malmö University's forward-thinking environment, modern facilities, and supportive professors. A small percentage (~9.5%) report issues with resources like printers and overpriced course materials.
With a 3.5/5 average rating, most feedback is positive (~100%). One student found the Borlänge campus building great but struggled with obtaining student information through confused online platforms.
Both university reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students highlight the immersive, hands-on approach, freedom to shape studies, and the opportunity to build relationships. Approximately 0% of feedback is negative.
Uppsala itself is a great city, it's easy to go to Stockholm and Arlanda. But to be in Uppsala as a university student is a whole experience on its own. With Nations, parties, fikas, cafés, parties (yes again), bars, knitting groups and many other events Uppsala has a place for everyone. (The other Universities in the top 3 would be Lund University and...... well the third is not set in stone as there are a few universities and "högskolor" to choose from" In my experience professors and teachers, competence will vary depending. But the great ones are really great.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Its perhaps one of the worst University experiences ever. I go Graphic Design here. One of the hardest programms to get into and I regret it by a mile. We have no proper working printers and quality paper for our assignments. Our teachers force us to buy their own programmes they are working with and their overpriced books. While the lesson don't focus on anything manually or artistic. We have for three months now worked with how to write essay and had lectures about philosophy. Graphic design like making posters or website? Little to non. And when we actually have to make a website our teachers refuse to teach us the new program or principles for the assignment. Instead we are referred to YouTube.The general lesson are chaotic with little to non proper planning over the courses. Social aspects of the school is also rather weak. It's nice the first two weeks when you enter, then ? Nothing, barely any socialising and events.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
