SKEMA Business School vs Audencia Business School vs ONCAMPUS Global vs IPAG Business School vs Excelia Business School

Side-by-side comparison from 342 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: ONCAMPUS Global (4.80)
SKEMA Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Audencia Business School: wins 0/7 categories
ONCAMPUS Global: wins 1/7 categories
IPAG Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Excelia Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Schiller International University: wins 2/7 categories
Forward College: wins 4/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Master in Management
London, The United Kingdom
4.80
Top
Read more reviews
21 reviews
×
Best programme: Undergraduate Foundation Programme
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
La Rochelle, France
4.10
Read more reviews
67 reviews
×
Best programme: Master of Science (MSc)
Tampa, Florida, United States
4.40
Read more reviews
15 reviews
×
Best programme: BA International Relations and Diplomacy
Paris, France
4.70
Read more reviews
32 reviews
×
Best programme: Data Science
Category ratings
Facilities
4.23
4.05
4.44
3.45
4.02
3.93
4.45
Win
Location
4.32
4.06
4.75
4.73
4.30
4.87
Win
4.83
Professors
4.37
4.14
4.76
3.82
3.91
4.53
4.91
Win
Internationality
4.43
4.43
4.62
3.91
4.30
4.87
Win
4.56
Student life
4.25
4.05
4.58
3.91
4.25
4.14
4.58
Win
Value
4.09
4.10
4.52
3.82
3.91
4.13
4.56
Win
Accommodation
3.70
3.60
4.35
Win
3.27
3.66
3.62
4.29
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical skills and real-world business application
  • +International environment and diverse experiences
  • +Career development and professional growth
  • +Strong professors and diverse international student community.
  • +Excellent facilities and good class scheduling.
  • +Beneficial business programs and city amenities.
  • +Supportive and approachable teachers
  • +Excellent student support services
  • +Convenient campus location and facilities
  • +Experienced and supportive faculty, focused on student well-being and professional development.
  • +Program relevance to career goals, practical experience, and adaptability to student feedback.
  • +Welcoming and inclusive environment, fostering a sense of community and individual value.
  • +Practical learning, internships, and experienced instructors.
  • +International exposure and multicultural environment.
  • +High-quality teaching and good course content.
  • +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
  • +Opportunities for personal and professional growth
  • +Helpful staff and organized curriculum
  • +International and diverse community
  • +Interactive and engaging learning approach
  • +Focus on personal growth and development
Cons
  • -Administrative & management issues
  • -Poor communication and guidance
  • -Outdated facilities and teaching faculty
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of practical tools.
  • -Disengaged professors unwilling to accept feedback.
  • -Limited opportunities for student interaction.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and lack of clear communication are frustrating.
  • -Limited resources and support for academic needs are a concern.
  • -Unprofessional coordination and administrative issues.
  • -Low academic quality and unfulfilled course offerings.
  • -Poor student support and delayed essential documentation.
  • -Superficial academic content and lack of practical value.
  • -Ineffective career support, including internships and apprenticeships.
  • -Courses not aligning with student expectations or career goals.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant problems.
  • -Lack of extracurriculars and career support limits student experience.
  • -Teaching quality varies and some courses lack depth.
  • -Administrative and management issues are frequent sources of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently criticized.
  • -A lack of clarity or support regarding curriculum and academic expectations is a common complaint.
Rating summary
What students say

Across surveyed categories, this institution demonstrates robust strengths in **Internationality (4.43)** and **Professors (4.37)**. Student life, location, and facilities also received positive scores. However, **Accomodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at **3.70**, suggesting potential room for improvement in that specific aspect. The overall value is also rated favorably at 4.09.

This institution demonstrates strong internationality, achieving its highest rating in this area. Professors are also highly regarded. While most categories received positive feedback, accommodation stands out as the weakest point, with a noticeably lower score compared to other aspects. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded profile with a particular strength in its global appeal and academic staff.

This institution garners strong approval across multiple aspects, with particularly high marks for its **Professors (4.76)** and **Location (4.75)**. Student life and internationality also score well, above 4.5. **Accommodations (4.35)** received the lowest rating, though still generally positive, while facilities and value demonstrate solid, above-average performance.

An analysis of the university's ratings reveals a distinct pattern, with **Location** standing out as the strongest area, scoring a near-perfect 4.7. Areas such as **Student Life** and **Internationality** also received strong marks, both at 3.87. Conversely, **Accomodation** represents the weakest aspect, with a rating of 3.25, closely followed by **Facilities** at 3.44. Professors and Value are rated moderately well.

Performing exceptionally well, this university boasts its strongest ratings in **Location** (4.30) and **Internationality** (4.30), closely followed by **Student Life** (4.25). Areas for potential improvement include **Accomodation**, which received the lowest score at 3.66, and **Professors** and **Value**, both rated at 3.91. The **Facilities** score stands at a respectable 4.02.

This university is highly rated, particularly excelling in **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.87. **Professors** also receive strong marks at 4.53. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.62. **Facilities** are also on the lower end at 3.93, though **Student Life** and **Value** are rated positively around 4.1.

Evaluations reveal a strong academic offering, with **Professors** receiving the highest marks at 4.91. **Location** also scores exceptionally well at 4.83. The university demonstrates good performance in **Student Life** (4.58) and **Internationality** (4.56), with **Value** also rated favorably at 4.56. **Facilities** are rated at 4.45, and **Accomodation** stands out as the area with the lowest score at 4.29.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.37/5 average rating from 175 reviews, approximately 97.7% of students provide positive feedback. Key highlights include practical skills, international opportunities, and professional development. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions poor management and organization.

The vast majority of university reviews are positive, praising the learning environment, facilities, and diverse international community. A small percentage of feedback expresses disappointment with practical training and professor engagement.

All 21 reviews are positive, averaging 4.76/5 stars. Students frequently praised helpful teachers, strong academic support, and good facilities. Some also highlighted a positive transition experience and newfound confidence.

~82% of reviews are positive, highlighting good programs, attentive staff, and a welcoming environment. A small portion (~18%) mentions issues with course delivery, coordination, and administrative support.

With a 4.07/5 average, ~82% of reviews are positive, highlighting international opportunities, practical learning, and a multicultural environment. A small ~4.5% of feedback is negative, citing superficial course coverage and limited practical value.

The university is highly praised for its diverse student body, rich learning experiences, and opportunities for personal and career growth. However, about 13% of reviews mention inconsistent teaching quality and administrative issues.

With an average rating of 4.66/5 from 32 reviews, students praise Forward College's enriching international environment and innovative, interactive teaching methods. Personal and academic growth are frequently highlighted.

Rating distribution
5★
50%
29%
76%
18%
31%
67%
66%
4★
41%
67%
24%
64%
51%
20%
34%
3★
7%
0%
0%
0%
13%
0%
0%
2★
1%
5%
0%
9%
3%
13%
0%
1★
1%
0%
0%
9%
1%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Class of 2018, Int'l Business Administration

Studying at Skema Business School in Sophia Antipolis was a fantastic experience. The campus is modern and located in a wonderful tech hub. The professors bring real-world business experience to the classroom. I loved the multicultural environment and the group projects. Skema gave me great friends, a strong global network, and the right skills for my career.

Focus on multicultural business management

I have been quite satisfied by the quality of teaching at Audencia. The lecturers and professors are knowledgeable and place an emphasis on professionalism and leveraging culture in business dealings.

Nothing to show

Bachelor in business administration

The people that are supposed to help you at IPAG are not going to do it, and if they do it would take as long as they want it to take, for example, I tried to renew my visa with the university because they told me like that was easier and it took 8 months in the process, my visa got expired, I almost got kicked out of the country and I ended up doing the process myself. Besides this, I just graduated this year on august and as well as all my classmates we have been trying to get our certificates and our grades in order to start to work or to continue our postgraduate studies but they just don't want to give us all this. IPAG is not a university with organization and neither who cares about their students, just about your money. If you are foreign you will get to know people from all the world and you will have a good experience but you can do this also at any other university in europe and you would be way more taken in count.

Nothing to show

The cultural mix and the great atmosphere.

I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.

Great modern university approach

I am currently a 3rd year student at Forward College and I have thoroughly enjoyed the experience and would recommend it to other students. The interactive approach of Forward where questions, debate, and discussion were encouraged enhanced my learning so much and I feel like I genuinely enjoyed every class. Having the experience of living in 3 different cultures, surrounded by people from all over the world made this experience even more special and helped me develop and grow in so many ways. Another aspect I have loved are the professors. Speaking with friends at other university I am so grateful to have teachers that actually know us, are excited to teach and interact with us, and will always take the time to help you.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close