ICN Business School vs Université de Lorraine vs École Nationale Supérieure d'Agronomie et des Industries Alimentaire - ENSAIA vs Ecole des Ponts Business School vs CESI
Side-by-side comparison from 20 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Diverse and international student body
- +Affordable and convenient programs
- +Strong academic reputation and programs
- +Exceptional academic programs and quality education
- +Supportive and approachable faculty and researchers
- +Lively campus with good opportunities for personal and professional growth
- +Clear program specialization after common core
- +Focused agricultural and food industry engineering education
- +Transformative personal and professional growth
- +Practical, market-relevant skills for career advancement
- +High-quality, competent faculty and engaging courses
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Engaging professors and quality of classes
- +Positive university atmosphere and facilities
- +Excellent sports activities
- -Excessive administrative and management issues hinder progress.
- -Outdated facilities and technology create an unpleasant learning environment.
- -Inconsistent and unclear communication from instructors and the institution causes frustration.
- -Administrative and management issues caused significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources were frequently mentioned.
- -Poor communication and unclear expectations led to dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of transparency are prevalent concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of resources and support for students is a major concern.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor infrastructure are common complaints.
- -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts the learning experience.
Overall, this institution receives positive evaluations, with its **location** standing out as a significant strength, achieving the highest rating. Facilities and student life also scored well, both at 4. Accommodations are a slightly weaker point, rated at 3.5, while the ratings for professors and internationality are comparable and solid.
This university garners exceptional ratings for its professors, who received a high score of 4.33. Location and student life also score well at 4. Conversely, the institution's weakest areas are internationality and value, both averaging 3.44. Facilities and accommodation present a middle ground with scores around 3.7.
With excellent ratings in accommodation and strong showings in professors and student life, this institution presents a positive picture. Its weakest areas appear to be in facilities and internationality, both receiving moderate scores. The overall value is well-regarded, suggesting a solid educational investment despite some room for improvement in physical resources and global engagement.
Overall, this university receives commendations across most aspects, with particularly high marks for its professors (4.83) and internationality (4.67). Facilities and student life also score well. The weakest area identified is accommodation, with a rating of 3.33. Value for money is rated at a solid 4.17.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Outstanding marks are awarded for facilities, location, student life, and accommodation, all receiving a perfect score. While internationality is a strong point at four, professors and overall value are areas that received moderate ratings.
With an average rating of 4.33/5, positive feedback (~100%) highlights diversity, affordability, and strong alumni networks. Students also recommend it for rigorous programs and convenient international student support.
All nine reviews are positive, giving an average rating of 4.11/5. Students praise the excellent research environment, high-quality education, and approachable, supportive faculty. The diversity of programs is also a recurring positive theme.
This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~100% of reviews being favorable. Students appreciate the clear specialization options in agronomy and agrifood, allowing informed career choices.
All 6 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students highlight challenging and transformative experiences, career advancements, and high-quality courses and professors.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With one review, the average rating is 4/5, reflecting overwhelmingly positive feedback (~100%). Recurring themes include a good atmosphere, quality facilities and sports activities. Some mention mixed feelings about classes, depending on professors.
First of all, the courses taught in this course are of high quality, partly due to the quality of the speakers in the school. The courses are complete and are in line with current trends. However, the speakers were not all very qualitative, whether in terms of communicating the homework to be done or their lessons. Overall the program is open to international but having been educated at the time of the COVID-19 epidemic, I could not get an idea of the international side of this school. Thus, the Bachelor's at ICN Business School is a fairly versatile course, focused on the different areas that can be found in management (communication, accounting, CV creation workshops and cover letters, etc.) Concerning opportunities, because of the partnerships that the school maintains with many large companies, I find that it is simple having gone through this school to apply for and obtain a work contract, both in France and abroad. the international.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
