emlyon business school vs Jean Moulin Lyon 3 - JML vs ESDES School of Management vs IAE Lyon School of Management vs INSEEC Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 84 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, international, and globally-minded programs with diverse student body.
- +Strong focus on professional development through internships and career support.
- +Rich program offerings with opportunities for personal and academic growth.
- +Practical application and industry relevance
- +Diverse academic programs and extensive choices
- +Supportive environment and accessible services
Nothing to show
- +Small class sizes and ideal study conditions
- +Diverse guest speakers from academic and entrepreneurial backgrounds
- +Focus on innovative learning and support for student initiatives
- +Skill development and career preparation
- +Supportive and diverse learning environment
- +Practical application of knowledge and professional integration
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Lack of practical learning and perceived filler content.
- -Unfair and frustrating grading, especially for group projects.
- -Poor professor engagement and program support.
- -Poor communication and unhelpful administrative staff are frustrating.
- -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Course content feels irrelevant and not aligned with current industry needs.
Nothing to show
- -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources.
- -Poor communication and administrative inefficiencies.
- -Lack of support and irrelevant course content.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Reviewing the provided ratings, the institution demonstrates notable strengths in **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving scores above 4.5. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerged as the area with the lowest rating, falling below 4.0. Other categories, including Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Value, all scored commendably, generally ranging between 4.05 and 4.4.
This institution shines with outstanding ratings in its facilities and location, both receiving a near-perfect score. Student life, accommodation, and internationality are also strong points, all scoring above 4.3. However, the ratings indicate professors are the weakest area, with a score of 3, while the overall value is rated a respectable 4.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates significant strengths in its **Location**, achieving a perfect score, and a strong showing in **Student Life** with a 4. Its **Facilities** and **Professors** are rated moderately at 3.5. However, **Accomodation** and **Internationality** received the lowest scores, both at 3. Despite these areas for improvement, the university offers good **Value** at 4.
This institution garners excellent marks, particularly in **Location** (4.64) and **Internationality** (4.59). **Student Life** (4.09) and **Professors** (4.05) also score highly. The **Value** of the education is rated at 3.77, while **Facilities** receive a respectable 3.59. The weakest area is **Accomodation**, with a rating of 3.24.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The vast majority of reviews (around 98%) are positive, praising the program's academic rigor, international environment, and career support. A small percentage of feedback (about 2%) expressed disappointment with limited practical learning and grading fairness.
With a 3.67 average rating from 3 reviews, feedback is mostly positive (~67%). Students highlight strong academic programs and diverse educational opportunities. No negative reviews were submitted.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4/5, student feedback is largely positive. Reviews highlight ideal study conditions, particularly within master programs, and a strong focus on entrepreneurial initiatives.
With a 3.96 average rating from 24 reviews, approximately 71% of feedback is positive. Students frequently praise skill development, professional preparation, and a friendly, multicultural atmosphere. A few mention minor issues with organization and administrative communication.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This university has a lot of qualities such as adapting to students in order to optimize learning, and the desire to confront the student as quickly as possible with the world of work. On the other hand, I would criticize this school for poorly disseminated information and a gloomy community life.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
