Université de Bordeaux vs SKEMA Business School vs European programme in Pharmacovigilance and Pharmacoepidemiology - Eu2P vs École des Ponts Business School vs Sup de Pub

Side-by-side comparison from 161 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: SKEMA Business School (4.40)
Université de Bordeaux: wins 2/6 categories
SKEMA Business School: wins 4/6 categories
European programme in Pharmacovigilance and Pharmacoepidemiology - Eu2P: wins 0/6 categories
École des Ponts Business School: wins 0/6 categories
Sup de Pub: wins 0/6 categories
National Superior School and Architecture De Bordeaux - ENSAP Bordeaux: wins 0/6 categories
Bordeaux INP: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Law
4.40
Top
Read more reviews
132 reviews
×
Best programme: Supply Chain Management
Paris, France
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Bordeaux, France
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.24
Win
4.21
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.25
4.25
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.36
4.42
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
4.20
4.36
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.04
4.11
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.00
4.03
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.84
Win
3.57
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent professors and top-notch education
  • +Diverse courses and international student support
  • +Vibrant city life and conducive learning environment
  • +strong international exposure & opportunities
  • +practical and relevant program curriculum & skills
  • +valuable alumni network & career support

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +strong career support and work-study programs
  • +practical, work-study focused pedagogy
  • +alumni network and company relations

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Inconvenient location and impractical, theoretical teaching.
  • -Poor professor attitudes and unproductive, lengthy class hours.
  • -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and disorganization.
  • -Perceived focus on profit over student welfare, with concerns about teaching quality and discrimination.
  • -Ineffective career guidance and support for students.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues create disorganization and stress.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning and functionality.
  • -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts student experience.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Generally, the university receives positive marks, with professors and facilities standing out as its strongest aspects. Student life and internationality are also well-regarded. The weakest area identified is accommodation, which received the lowest score. Overall, the university presents a solid offering with room for improvement in its living arrangements.

A comprehensive assessment reveals a university with distinct strengths and areas for improvement. Professors and internationality stand out as particularly strong aspects, receiving high marks. Student life and facilities are also rated positively. However, accommodation emerges as the weakest area, with a noticeably lower score compared to other metrics. Value for money is also a solid, though not exceptional, performer in this rating overview.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution received no scores across all evaluated metrics: Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value. Consequently, no specific areas can be identified as strongest or weakest. The absence of any ratings prevents a comprehensive assessment of the university's performance.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.11/5, ~82% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent professors, diverse courses, and a vibrant city. A small portion (~4%) notes distance from the city and impractical teaching methods.

Around 97% of reviews are positive, praising international opportunities, practical curriculum, and helpful alumni networks. A small percentage (around 3%) cite issues with management, communication, and organization.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

The single review is highly positive (4/5 stars), praising work-study support and company relations. No negative feedback was provided.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
32%
49%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
50%
42%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
3★
14%
7%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
4%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
M2 MBA

My experience at the University of Bordeaux was truly remarkable. Interacting with people from diverse backgrounds—varying countries, educational fields, and experiences—was incredibly enriching. The university's emphasis on delivering top-notch education was evident in its supportive atmosphere and dedicated faculty. I found my studies in business administration, marketing, and finance particularly enlightening, thanks to the guidance of highly qualified teachers.

Experience in School

My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close