IÉSEG School of Management vs SKEMA Business School vs EDHEC Business School vs ONCAMPUS Global vs ESIEE Paris
Side-by-side comparison from 579 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Vibrant student life and positive campus experience
- +International environment and engaging professors
- +Strong academic programs and modern facilities
- +Practical skills and real-world business application
- +International environment and diverse experiences
- +Career development and professional growth
- +High-quality teaching with industry-experienced professors
- +Strong corporate network and alumni support for career development
- +Practical, challenging courses aligning with employer needs
- +Supportive and approachable teachers
- +Excellent student support services
- +Convenient campus location and facilities
- +Strong partnerships and practical skills development.
- +International diversity and supportive community.
- +Versatile, English-taught programs with professional instructors.
- +Practical curriculum & professional instructors
- +International opportunities & diverse environment
- +Strong alumni network & career preparation
- +Academic rigor and intellectual challenge
- +Personal growth and skill development
- +Career advancement and practical relevance
- -Frequent last-minute changes disrupt scheduling and planning.
- -Concerns exist regarding the academic quality and professor engagement.
- -Administrative & management issues
- -Poor communication and guidance
- -Outdated facilities and teaching faculty
- -Steep tuition fees are a significant financial burden.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and lack of clear communication are frustrating.
- -Limited resources and support for academic needs are a concern.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and unresponsive administration cause frustration.
- -Lack of career support and industry relevance disappoint students.
- -Superficial course content and lack of practical value.
- -Unprofessional training and high tuition costs without adequate support.
- -Misalignment between program offerings and student expectations.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities are a common complaint.
- -A lack of administrative support and poor communication causes frustration.
- -Course content and teaching quality are frequently criticized as being below expectations.
Internationality and Student Life emerge as the university's strongest points, both receiving ratings above 4.5. Location also scores highly. Conversely, Accommodations represent the weakest area with a rating of 3.92. Facilities and Professors are rated moderately well, while Value stands out as a strong performer at 4.31.
Across surveyed categories, this institution demonstrates robust strengths in **Internationality (4.43)** and **Professors (4.37)**. Student life, location, and facilities also received positive scores. However, **Accomodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at **3.70**, suggesting potential room for improvement in that specific aspect. The overall value is also rated favorably at 4.09.
This university performs exceptionally well in **Internationality** (4.44) and **Professors** (4.33), indicating a strong global outlook and excellent academic staff. **Facilities** (4.32) and **Student Life** (4.17) also receive positive marks. The weakest area is **Accomodation** (3.26), suggesting room for improvement in housing options. **Location** (3.83) is a moderate strength, while **Value** (4.06) is also well-regarded.
This institution garners strong approval across multiple aspects, with particularly high marks for its **Professors (4.76)** and **Location (4.75)**. Student life and internationality also score well, above 4.5. **Accommodations (4.35)** received the lowest rating, though still generally positive, while facilities and value demonstrate solid, above-average performance.
This institution boasts a consistently high level of performance across most surveyed areas. Its strongest aspects lie in internationality and value, both scoring an excellent 4.5. Facilities, professors, location, student life, and accommodation all receive a solid 4, indicating a well-rounded and positive university experience. No significantly weak areas were identified within these ratings.
This university garners high marks for its **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.3. **Student Life** also received a strong rating. The **Facilities** are well-regarded, while **Professors** and **Value** are rated moderately. The **Accomodation** is the lowest-scoring aspect, indicating this is the area with the most room for improvement.
This institution garners very strong ratings in most surveyed categories. Exceptional scores were awarded for Professors (4.86) and Internationality (4.71). Facilities and Student Life also received high marks (4.6 each). The weakest area identified is Accomodation, with a rating of 3.75. Value and Location received solid, though not top-tier, scores.
With an average rating of 4.38/5 and 234 positive reviews (approximately 91%), students highly recommend the university for its engaging programs, international environment, and vibrant student life. Very limited negative feedback (approximately 0.8%) exists.
With a 4.37/5 average rating from 175 reviews, approximately 97.7% of students provide positive feedback. Key highlights include practical skills, international opportunities, and professional development. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions poor management and organization.
With an average rating of 4.27/5 from 49 reviews, ~98% are positive. Students highlight excellent teaching quality, strong industry connections, practical courses, and valuable career support. Minimal negative feedback questioned tuition costs versus benefits.
All 21 reviews are positive, averaging 4.76/5 stars. Students frequently praised helpful teachers, strong academic support, and good facilities. Some also highlighted a positive transition experience and newfound confidence.
Both reviews are positive, giving an average rating of 4/5 stars. Students highlight strong partnerships with businesses and a welcoming international community. The program is described as versatile and taught in English.
~81% of reviews are positive, highlighting international opportunities, practical learning, and networking. A small portion of feedback (~4.4%) expresses disappointment with academic depth and course relevance.
All 7 reviews are positive, averaging 4.57/5. Students highlight academic excellence, intellectual rigor, a human learning experience, and career advancement. No negative feedback was provided.
IÉSEG offers interactive teaching and international opportunities. I had the chance to go on an exchange to another country, which opened up new perspectives for me. The courses in Lille are stimulating, and the professors are very involved in our success.
Studying at Skema Business School in Sophia Antipolis was a fantastic experience. The campus is modern and located in a wonderful tech hub. The professors bring real-world business experience to the classroom. I loved the multicultural environment and the group projects. Skema gave me great friends, a strong global network, and the right skills for my career.
I absolutely love everything about EDHEC, beginning from the pedagogy to the atmosphere it provides to the students (especially international) on campus. The extracurricular activities like sports, associations are very helpful. Also, the career service provided is top-notch. Therefore, I would call it an enriching experience so far.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
