Curtin University vs Engineering Institute of Technology vs Central Queensland University vs The University of Western Australia vs Edith Cowan University
Side-by-side comparison from 92 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, hands-on learning and skill development
- +Industry-relevant curriculum and experienced faculty
- +Strong global reputation and graduate employment satisfaction
Nothing to show
- +Adaptable and supportive learning options
- +Helpful student support services and lecturers
- +Practical learning experience and facilities
- +Excellent curriculum and faculty support
- +Strong community, diversity, and inclusion
- +Abundant resources and engaging campus life
- +Exceptional staff, teachers, and lecturers providing strong support and guidance.
- +High-quality infrastructure, facilities, and resources for learning and research.
- +Practical learning, industry engagement, and extracurricular activities enhance the student experience.
- +Real-world skills and practical application
- +Supportive faculty and counselors
- +Friendly, vibrant, and diverse campus environment
Nothing to show
- -Inefficient and unhelpful administrative processes.
- -Lack of engagement and poor communication from instructors.
- -Outdated resources and uninspiring learning environments.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of necessary resources are a problem.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from faculty are significant concerns.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a significant concern.
- -Administrative inefficiencies and poor communication create frustration.
- -Lack of engaging teaching methods and relevant curriculum is a common complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of support and resources is a significant concern for students.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and poorly delivered by some.
Nothing to show
This institution receives high marks in several key areas, with **Facilities** and **Value** standing out as its strongest performers. **Student Life**, **Internationality**, and **Professors** also earned very positive reviews. The university's **Location** is rated well, though not as highly as its top-scoring categories. **Accommodations** received the lowest score among the surveyed aspects, indicating a potential area for improvement.
Nothing to show
Exceptional ratings highlight the university's strengths in Location (4.83) and Internationality (4.63), reflecting positive student experiences in these areas. Student Life (4.5) and Facilities (4.43) also score highly. Conversely, Value (4.0) received the lowest rating among the surveyed categories, indicating a potential area for improvement.
Across various aspects, this university demonstrates a generally positive reception. Facilities stand out as a particular strength, earning the highest rating. Student life and professors also receive commendable scores, as does internationality and value. Location is rated consistently well. The weakest area, though still respectable, is accommodation.
This institution achieves top marks in Location and Internationality, both scoring a perfect 4. Conversely, its weakest areas are Value and Student Life, receiving the lowest ratings of 3.44 and 3.56 respectively. Facilities and Professors also performed well, with ratings above 3.7. Accomodation sits at a respectable 3.5.
Across surveyed categories, this university excels in **Internationality** and **Professors**, both scoring an impressive 4.43. **Value** also garners a strong rating of 4. The **Facilities** and **Accomodation** represent the weakest areas, with scores of 3.43 and 3.4 respectively. **Student Life** and **Location** fall in the middle ground, scoring 4 and 3.83.
Nothing to show
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~92% of feedback), with students praising experienced faculty and practical, industry-relevant curriculum. There is minimal negative feedback.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.13/5 from 8 reviews, students report high satisfaction with supportive learning options and helpful staff. All feedback received was positive.
With an average rating of 4.09/5, ~82% of reviews are positive. Students highlight strong academics, excellent facilities, and a supportive community with accessible resources and diverse inclusion. No negative feedback was recorded.
Six out of nine reviews are positive, highlighting staff, study, infrastructure, and facilities. No negative reviews were noted.
All 7 reviews are positive (100%), with an average rating of 4.43/5. Students highlight acquiring real-world skills and a fulfilling academic experience. Professors are described as knowledgeable and approachable, contributing to a vibrant and supportive campus environment.
Nothing to show
Curtin University is greta for those who are very "career-centric"; the university itself places great emphasis on how to find internships and jobs and are very supportive in that regard. The university is also one that places importance on social networking, whether that be through clubs, discord servers and affordable or free social events. One thing I do dislike however is the disorganisation in some courses or how little spaces there can be for classes (this might be specific to my major/course though). Overall I have enjoyed my time here so far.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
