London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs Coventry University vs ONCAMPUS Global vs Keele University - KLE vs Teesside University
Side-by-side comparison from 1,038 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Knowledgeable and approachable faculty
- +High-quality academic programs and clear feedback
- +Excellent facilities and resources
- +Supportive and approachable staff
- +Modern and well-equipped facilities
- +Practical learning and career preparation
- +Supportive and approachable teachers
- +Excellent student support services
- +Convenient campus location and facilities
- +Diverse student body and wide course variety
- +Strong program-specific academic support and practical training
- +Welcoming campus environment with extracurricular activities
- +Accessible and supportive lecturers
- +Practical, industry-focused programs with career support
- +Affordable and supportive city environment
- +Supportive and knowledgeable tutors
- +Engaging daily webinars with market analysis
- +Improved trading profitability and understanding
- +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
- +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
- +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network
- -Poor teaching quality and unstructured courses.
- -High fees combined with lack of support and career services.
- -Limited social life and judgmental environment.
- -Lack of effective teaching and inadequate staff knowledge.
- -Poor student support and administrative issues.
- -Concerns about value for money and overcrowded student populations.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and lack of clear communication are frustrating.
- -Limited resources and support for academic needs are a concern.
- -Administrative & management issues often cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Limited career services and poor job prospects are a major concern.
- -Lack of lecturer and student care support
- -Poor educational facilities and professor knowledge
- -Unsafe campus environment due to high crime rates
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of engagement and uninspired teaching methods are disliked.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
- -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
Examining the university's performance reveals a diverse set of scores. The strongest areas are **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving very high marks. **Student Life** stands out as the weakest performing category. Other areas like **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Facilities** received solid, above-average ratings, with **Value** also scoring positively.
This university garners strong marks, particularly for its vibrant Student Life, which received the highest rating. Academically, both Facilities and Professors are well-regarded, alongside a solid showing in Internationality and Location. Areas with slightly lower scores include Accomodation and Value, though these remain respectable.
This institution garners strong approval across multiple aspects, with particularly high marks for its **Professors (4.76)** and **Location (4.75)**. Student life and internationality also score well, above 4.5. **Accommodations (4.35)** received the lowest rating, though still generally positive, while facilities and value demonstrate solid, above-average performance.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its academic and international offerings, with Professors and Internationality receiving particularly high scores. Student Life and Facilities are also well-regarded. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as a weaker area, with a significantly lower rating compared to other aspects. The university also fares well in Value and Location, indicating a generally positive overall experience.
This university garners its highest marks for **Facilities**, achieving a score of 4.47. **Professors** and **Internationality** also stand out with scores above 4.25. In contrast, **Accomodation** receives the lowest rating at 3.83. Other areas like **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Value** are rated competently between 4.12 and 4.18.
Across numerous metrics, this institution demonstrates exceptional strengths. Facilities, professors, location, student life, and internationality all garnered perfect scores, indicating outstanding offerings in these domains. The sole area falling slightly short, though still very strong, is accommodation at 4.5 stars, suggesting a minor area for potential enhancement compared to its otherwise flawless performance.
This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.
Approximately 96.6% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable professors, supportive learning environments, and strong academic reputations. A small percentage (around 3.4%) of negative feedback cites issues with lecturing, grading, and course structure.
With a 4.03 average rating from 588 reviews, ~99% of feedback is positive. Students praise the welcoming environment, supportive staff, and diverse programs, finding it conducive for academic and personal growth. A small percentage of negative reviews mention issues with organization and staff knowledge.
All 21 reviews are positive, averaging 4.76/5 stars. Students frequently praised helpful teachers, strong academic support, and good facilities. Some also highlighted a positive transition experience and newfound confidence.
The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (~97%), with students praising its diverse student body, varied courses, and supportive learning environment. Specific programs like Computer Science and Nursing are highlighted for strong academics and practical training. No negative reviews were recorded.
Approximately 96% of reviews are positive, highlighting accessible lecturers, supportive careers services, and enjoyable city life. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions a lack of lecturer support and concerns about local safety.
Both reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Key highlights include excellent tutors, engaging daily webinars, and improved trading profitability. Students appreciated the supportive learning environment that clarified market understanding.
Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
I honestly wouldn’t advise someone to come to this university to be honest. They’re just interested in your money and leave you with no support after that. I’ll advice to spend your money elsewhere because it isn’t worth it AT ALL
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The approachable teachers and the facilities are top-notch. The majority of my studies were during COVID-19 so student life can't be assessed. Accommodations in Middlebrough are cheap and very affordable when compared to other places and other universities. The course modules were very helpful except for 3D interactive visualization which I really don't think is applicable as a data scientist and can be replaced with SQL instead.
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
