Université de Nantes vs Ecole Centrale de Nantes vs IMT Atlantique – Graduate Engineering School vs Leonard de Vinci Graduate School of Engineering - ESILV vs Digital College
Side-by-side comparison from 36 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Diverse course options and competent instructors
- +Abundant extracurricular activities and social events
- +Strong industry reputation and career opportunities
- +Strong engineering curriculum and practical application focus.
- +Knowledgeable, supportive, and approachable professors.
- +Excellent hands-on learning opportunities and advanced facilities.
- +Strong French language support
- +Rigorous academic programs
- +Modern facilities and accessibility
- +Strong student associations, especially technical ones
- +Well-regarded programmes
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Students dislike the administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep are frequently mentioned.
- -The curriculum and teaching quality are sources of dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning and comfort.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a persistent problem.
- -Administrative and management issues caused frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources were a recurring problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and support was a common complaint.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and unclear communication.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources.
- -Poor teaching quality and irrelevant curriculum.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This university's student life stands out with the highest rating, indicating a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, accommodation received the lowest score, suggesting potential areas for improvement in housing facilities. Other aspects like facilities, professors, location, internationality, and value fall within a mid-range of positive assessments, painting a generally favorable picture with specific strengths and weaknesses.
This institution receives strong accolades for its Facilities, Professors, and Internationality, all scoring an impressive 4.67. Student Life and Value are also highly rated at 4.33. The University's Location garners a solid 4. However, Accomodation stands out as the area with the lowest score, receiving a 3.67 rating.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Facilities**, **Student Life**, **Internationality**, and **Value**, all receiving high ratings. Areas of average performance include **Professors**, **Location**, and **Accommodation**. The university offers a well-rounded experience with particularly positive aspects in its infrastructure, student engagement, global outlook, and cost-effectiveness.
Academic strengths and facilities are notable highlights, with professors receiving a perfect score and facilities earning a strong 4 out of 5. Conversely, student life, location, and internationality received moderate ratings of 3, indicating areas where improvements could be considered. Overall, the institution offers good value and accommodation options.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Most students are highly satisfied, praising diverse academic options, competent instructors, and active student organizations. Integrations and online platforms are effective. No negative feedback was recorded.
All three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students highlight the rigorous engineering curriculum, hands-on learning, and knowledgeable, supportive professors. Limited accommodation is a minor drawback.
With a 4/5 average rating, student feedback is predominantly positive. One reviewer highlighted a challenging yet rewarding academic experience with French and English program requirements.
With a 4/5 average rating, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students praise its modern and accessible environment, though some note challenges joining student associations. Negative feedback is minimal (~0%).
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
IMT Atlantique Brest was an interesting phase in my academic life. Coming from an Anglophone educational system to a Francophone teaching style was quite a challenge at the beginning, but worthwhile in the end. My programme was in both French and English(60/40). Although I spoke a bit of French, it still required more knowledge to sail through the programme. This was made possible through the school's compulsory weekly French classes. The programme was very rigorous as we spent most of our time in class, in lab sessions or doing group projects. The professors are knowledgeable in their field and try to engage the students in each lesson, although some of them aren't good at transferring knowledge appropriately. The career seminars and job dating events were very beneficial in finding an internship and a job in the long run. Lastly, the intercultural environment helped me learn about different cultures, and also prepare me to work in multicultural teams in the real world. Overall, it was a good experience as I learned to study in a new language, make new friends and stand on my own in a new country. I just wish I did more research into the French teaching style before starting the programme.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
