Rennes School of Business vs Université de Bourgogne - UB vs Audencia Business School vs Burgundy School of Business vs School of Wine & Spirits Business
Side-by-side comparison from 102 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, real-world learning and experienced faculty
- +Diverse and international student and faculty community
- +Welcoming and supportive learning environment
- +Engaging faculty and practical, skill-building programs
- +Supportive and inspiring campus environment
- +Smooth application and onboarding process
- +Excellent professors, classes, and facilities.
- +Diverse international student community and cultural immersion.
- +Well-structured programs and ample opportunities for professional development and city exploration.
- +Engaging and high-quality programs with experienced professors.
- +Convenient and pleasant location with good infrastructure.
- +International diversity and friendly atmosphere.
Nothing to show
- +Practical teaching, real-life cases, and experiential learning
- +International environment and diverse programs with exchange opportunities
- +Supportive staff and high-quality teaching and content
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues create significant problems.
- -Poor English communication from staff and professors is a major frustration.
- -Administrative and management issues disrupt learning.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder educational experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and support causes frustration.
- -Lack of practical training and outdated facilities.
- -Unresponsive professors and poor management.
- -Inadequate return on investment for the high tuition fees.
- -Poor organizational structure hinders professors.
- -Insufficient career services and limited networking opportunities.
Nothing to show
- -Irrelevant courses and unqualified teachers lead to dissatisfaction.
- -High cost is not justified by the quality of education offered.
Nothing to show
Assessing the university's performance reveals a generally positive reception from students. Student life stands out as the strongest area, alongside internationality and professors, all receiving high marks. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest point, scoring notably lower than other aspects. Other categories like facilities, location, and value also garnered solid, above-average ratings.
Academic and student experience factors generally received positive feedback, with Student Life standing out as the strongest area. Facilities and Internationality also garnered high scores. The university's Location was rated as the weakest aspect among the surveyed categories, though still within a respectable range. Overall, the institution demonstrates a well-rounded offering with particular strengths in student engagement and international appeal.
Regarding its overall assessment, the institution performs best in **Internationality** (4.29) and **Value** (4.16). Professors also receive a high mark (4.03). The weakest area identified is **Accomodation** (3.47), though Facilities also scored relatively lower (3.85). Student Life and Location received solid ratings in the mid-range.
Academic and student experiences at this institution are generally well-regarded, with the location standing out as a particular strength. Professors and student life also received very positive feedback. However, areas such as facilities and accommodation represent opportunities for improvement, scoring notably lower than other aspects. Internationality and value for money fall within the mid-range of assessments.
Nothing to show
This institution performs best in Student Life, receiving a strong rating of 4.18. Professors, Location, and Internationality also received excellent marks around 4.09. The weakest area for the university is Accomodation, scoring 3.27. Facilities and Value are rated moderately well, with scores of 3.64 and 3.82 respectively.
Nothing to show
With ~97% positive feedback, students praise teaching methods, practical learning, global faculty, and strong business ties. A small fraction of reviews noted challenges for international students regarding language and administrative support.
The Université de Bourgogne receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~88% of 33 reviews rating it 4-5 stars. Students highlight esteemed faculty, practical learning, and an inclusive campus environment. No negative reviews were recorded.
With an average rating of 4.19/5, roughly 94% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent classes, professors, and facilities. One negative review expressed disappointment with a lack of practical training and professor engagement.
~63% of reviews are positive, praising location, program quality, and experiential learning. ~13% are negative, citing cost-effectiveness and facility issues. The average rating is 3.63/5.
Nothing to show
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical teaching, international focus, and supportive staff. One review (around 9%) criticizes course relevance and instructor quality.
Nothing to show
The school stands out as an exemplary institution with commendable features. The accommodation facilities are not only comfortable but also designed to foster a conducive learning environment. The faculty comprises diverse, highly qualified educators, ensuring a high standard of education. The emphasis on practical learning prepares students effectively for real-world scenarios. The institution offers a top-notch academic experience combined with excellent living standards, making it a highly recommended choice for those seeking quality education.
Nothing to show
I have been quite satisfied by the quality of teaching at Audencia. The lecturers and professors are knowledgeable and place an emphasis on professionalism and leveraging culture in business dealings.
As an international student attending the MBA WINE AND SPIRITS BUSINESS program and spending 32 thousand euros (besides the need of quitting my job, move, find an accommodation and change lifestyle) I would say that the school is worth less then half of what it costs. The only good aspects of it are the big students’ communities, the commitment of the international office and the quality of some teachers who cannot really give their best because they’re hampered by the strict organisation of the school programs. Administration, services and the overall school organisation are really below expectations and the educational level is just average despite the cost and the “reputation”. Everyone (classmates, other international students and french ones from all courses and years) complained about the fact that “the school used to be a good one, but now is just bad”!
Nothing to show
ESSCA School of Management is known for its international approach and diverse programs. In my opinion, many students appreciate its emphasis on experiential learning and the opportunities for international exposure through exchange programs and internships. However, some may find the workload demanding and challenging but that's the way it operates. Whether I recommend it would depend on your specific academic and career goals, as well as your preferences for learning style and environment. Likes/ Dislikes: *Essca provides enormous opportunities to improve and enhance your skill. *Diversified culture *Provides webinars and seminars across all the campuses. *Workload Management could be seen as an disadvantage. As sometimes, you may find it very challenging.
Nothing to show
