Université de Bordeaux vs EPITECH - EPITECH vs Bordeaux Sciences Agro vs INSEEC Business School vs Digital College
Side-by-side comparison from 54 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent professors and top-notch education
- +Diverse courses and international student support
- +Vibrant city life and conducive learning environment
- +High-quality, balanced training with relevant topics.
- +Strong company network for work-study and employment.
- +Vibrant, green campus atmosphere
- +Active student life and community
- +Strong industry connections for work experience
- +Diverse and multicultural atmosphere with approachable professors and quality teaching.
- +Strong support for work-study placements and professional integration.
- +Practical, hands-on learning experiences and networking opportunities.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Inconvenient location and impractical, theoretical teaching.
- -Poor professor attitudes and unproductive, lengthy class hours.
- -Administrative and management issues, with a focus on profit over student well-being and quality of education.
- -Lack of soft skills oriented learning, despite a strong technical environment.
- -High cost of education.
- -Poor program management and disjointed curriculum are significant frustrations.
- -Reliance on visiting lecturers rather than core faculty diminishes educational quality.
- -Inconsistent quality of organized activities and trips is a disappointment.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -The curriculum lacks relevance and is poorly delivered.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Generally, the university receives positive marks, with professors and facilities standing out as its strongest aspects. Student life and internationality are also well-regarded. The weakest area identified is accommodation, which received the lowest score. Overall, the university presents a solid offering with room for improvement in its living arrangements.
This institution garners excellent scores, particularly in its student life and internationality, both receiving perfect marks. Professors are also highly regarded with a top rating. Facilities and location are strong points, both at 4.5. Value for money is rated well at 4.5. The weakest area identified is accommodation, with a rating of 3.5.
This institution shines in several key aspects, with outstanding marks for Location, Student Life, and Internationality. Facilities and Accomodation also receive strong consideration. Conversely, the university's performance in Professors and Value is notably lower, suggesting areas for potential improvement in academic instruction and overall return on investment.
Performance across surveyed categories shows a diverse range of feedback. The university excels particularly in **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving exceptionally high scores. In contrast, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area. Other aspects like Professors, Student Life, and Value are rated moderately well, indicating room for improvement.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.11/5, ~82% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent professors, diverse courses, and a vibrant city. A small portion (~4%) notes distance from the city and impractical teaching methods.
Reviews are mixed, with a 3/5 average. ~40% of feedback is negative, citing high cost and lack of student well-being support. Positive feedback highlights excellent training and good employment networks.
With an average rating of 3/5, reviews are split evenly, with approximately 50% positive and 50% negative. Positive feedback highlights a vibrant, green campus, active student life, and strong industry connections. Negative feedback criticizes program management and disjointed education, particularly within a specific M2 program.
The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with approximately 67% of students rating it highly. Recurring themes include a friendly, multicultural atmosphere, supportive professors, and excellent preparation for professional life through practical experiences and group projects.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
My experience at the University of Bordeaux was truly remarkable. Interacting with people from diverse backgrounds—varying countries, educational fields, and experiences—was incredibly enriching. The university's emphasis on delivering top-notch education was evident in its supportive atmosphere and dedicated faculty. I found my studies in business administration, marketing, and finance particularly enlightening, thanks to the guidance of highly qualified teachers.
Nothing to show
I'm extremely dissatisfied with the Vineyard and Winery Management M2 program. The program is not managed well. Period. There are some gem professors and a class or two but overall the education is disjointed and relying too much on visiting lecturers. The gem professors are too busy researching or avoiding this program. The only pleasant activities organized by the program was a few of the wine region trips, but certainly not all of them. I suspect that most or all students in this program don't know how to manage a Winery or Vineyard. By no means was this worth the money, time, or headache.
This university has a lot of qualities such as adapting to students in order to optimize learning, and the desire to confront the student as quickly as possible with the world of work. On the other hand, I would criticize this school for poorly disseminated information and a gloomy community life.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
