EU Business School vs IU International University of Applied Sciences vs Macromedia University of Applied Sciences vs FOM University of Applied Sciences for Economics and Management vs Schiller International University
Side-by-side comparison from 360 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical learning & industry expert professors
- +Real-world application & career opportunities
- +Vibrant student life & global diversity
- +Flexible online study for work-life balance
- +Modern, intuitive digital platform for easy access
- +Relevant, high-quality educational content
- +Broadened horizons and excellent networking
- +Valuable real-world experience through company work
- +Supportive and understanding staff
- +Practical and theoretical learning relevance for careers
- +Qualified professors with industry experience
- +Collaborative learning through shared practical experiences
- +Strong academic programs and supportive instructors
- +Opportunities for international exposure and cultural immersion
- +Practical experience and career advancement support
- +Strong international business programs
- +Positive semester abroad opportunities
- +Strong technology, entrepreneurship, and innovation focus
- +Small classes and personal lecturer/staff experience
- +Excellent value for money and career/life start opportunities
- -Administrative and management issues create disorganization and unhelpful staff.
- -The educational quality is basic, with little support for extracurriculars and outdated facilities.
- -The university is perceived as a business focused on profit over student education and well-being.
- -Slow and unresponsive administrative processes, including grade processing and student support.
- -Poor staff attitude and lack of accountability for errors in student records and applications.
- -Inadequate support and guidance for online students.
- -Poor quality of education and lecturer qualifications.
- -High tuition fees disproportionate to class availability and contact hours.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of support and clear communication is frustrating.
- -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities for early students.
- -Poor campus environment and lack of engagement.
- -Administrative & management issues disrupt student experience.
- -Outdated facilities hinder learning and comfort.
- -Lack of clear communication and support causes frustration.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a consistent problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and course organization leads to confusion.
This university excels in **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring very highly. **Student Life** and **Facilities** also received favorable ratings. The **weakest area** for the institution is **Accomodation**, which received the lowest score among the evaluated aspects. **Value** and **Professors** fall in the mid-range, indicating areas with room for improvement.
This institution garners notable praise in several key areas, with **Internationality** and **Professors** receiving particularly high scores. The **Value** proposition is also well-regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the lowest-rated aspect. Other aspects like Facilities, Location, and Student Life fall within a more moderate range of positive feedback.
Examining the university's ratings reveals a mixed but generally positive picture. The institution excels particularly in **Internationality**, earning a high score. Strong performance is also noted for **Location** and **Professors**. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Value** received the lowest ratings, indicating areas for potential improvement.
This institution excels significantly in its facilities, professor quality, and overall value, all receiving perfect scores. Its location also garners top marks. Areas for improvement are student life and accommodation, both rated moderately. Internationality is a strong point, though not as high as the leading categories.
Considerable acclaim has been received across multiple university aspects. The institution excels particularly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.92. **Professors** also garnered high marks at 4.58. Conversely, the **Accomodation** received the lowest rating at 3.67, with **Facilities** also being a relative weakness at 3.83. **Student Life** and **Value** scored moderately well.
This institution excels in several key areas, achieving perfect scores for location, student life, internationality, and value. Facilities are also highly rated, indicating a positive student experience. Conversely, the university's performance in professor quality and accommodation received moderate scores, suggesting these aspects could be areas for improvement.
This institution excels in several key areas, earning perfect scores for Professors and Accomodation, and near-perfect ratings for Facilities and Student Life. Its strongest aspects clearly lie in the academic and living experiences offered. Conversely, the university's Internationality and Value for money received the lowest scores among the surveyed categories, indicating areas where there is room for improvement.
Most reviews (around 74%) are positive, highlighting practical learning and industry-expert professors. A smaller portion (~8.3%) of feedback expresses concerns about disorganization and basic education.
~95% of reviews are positive, praising flexibility, modern platforms, and accessible materials. A small percentage (~5%) mention issues with grading delays and slow administrative support.
With an average rating of 3/5 from three reviews, approximately 67% of feedback is negative. Students cite concerns about academic quality and value for money. One positive review highlighted broad horizons and networking opportunities.
The single review is highly positive, giving a 5/5 rating. This feedback highlights a good blend of theoretical and practical learning, relevant to future careers, and qualified professors.
With an average rating of 4.5/5 based on 12 reviews, approximately 92% of feedback is positive, highlighting independent learning opportunities, practical professors, and a good study abroad experience. A small portion (~8%) of reviews express dissatisfaction with limited extracurriculars and job opportunities.
With one review, the average rating is 4 out of 5 stars. This overwhelmingly positive feedback suggests a good experience, with no negative comments recorded.
All five reviews are positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students highlight a strong focus on technology and entrepreneurship, small class sizes, and a positive learning experience. No negative feedback was provided.
I love to take a path in a good environment to perform my ability to intend all the perspective that matches and are suitable for every student in daily lifestyle and work in a way which will be helpful for the needs or students to get higher oppurtuinitied
My experience with IU is very wonderful and exceptional. The learning process is smooth and easy especially for online students and the exams are well tailored to test your knowledge on what you have been learning. It is quite great indeed.
Nothing to show
In my opinion, it was a good mix of theoretic and action-based learning and therefore relevant for the job. The professors were very qualified and also had work experience. The exchange between students about the practical experience is part of the classes and helps to learn different perspectives.
Schiller university is the best thing that can ever happen to anyone l will never regret the day l applied and l mostly love their campus in Germany it has nice aesthetics and obviously l love their culture
Nothing to show
Excellent small school with a strong focus on technology and entrepreneurship; small classes; personal experience with lecturers and staff; well-designed curriculum; good lectures and interesting guest lecturers; a lot of traveling if you don't live in Hamburg's south, but manageable for three semesters; excellent value for money compared to UK/US schools, even without receiving one of the many scholarships; financial breakeven in less than two years; well-known in northern Germany, but now more so in central Europe; each class has one or two larger successful startups, with founders frequently giving lectures on campus; the alumni network feels more like a family than a pure "business network"; the new CEO is driving growth; and there are plenty of opportunities and support provided for extracurricular activities, initiatives, etc.
