Shahjalal University of Science and Technology - SUST vs Polytechnic University Institute Bamenda - NPB vs University of Bamenda - Uba vs Y Schools vs Leeds Conservatoire

Side-by-side comparison from 42 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Leeds Conservatoire (5.00)
Shahjalal University of Science and Technology - SUST: wins 0/5 categories
Polytechnic University Institute Bamenda - NPB: wins 0/5 categories
University of Bamenda - Uba: wins 0/5 categories
Y Schools: wins 1/5 categories
Leeds Conservatoire: wins 4/5 categories
Catholic University of Cameroon: wins 0/5 categories
Saint Louis University - Salusis: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Computer Science and Engineering
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
troyes, France
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Management
Leeds, The United Kingdom
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: School of Arts and Sciences
Category ratings
Facilities
4.16
Not rated
3.60
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.63
Not rated
3.93
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.42
Not rated
4.19
3.00
4.50
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
3.84
Not rated
3.81
5.00
Win
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.63
Not rated
4.33
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.32
Not rated
4.19
4.00
4.50
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.89
Not rated
3.75
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality education and teaching methods
  • +Friendly student environment and diverse opportunities
  • +Strong reputation and research focus
  • +Supportive and skilled staff providing academic and social guidance
  • +High-quality teaching and enthusiastic professors
  • +Affordable tuition and practical internship support
  • +Dedicated lecturers and strong academic programs
  • +Engaging learning environment with hands-on projects and extracurriculars
  • +Friendly, diverse atmosphere promoting culture and socialization
  • +Inclusive environment and diverse student body
  • +High-quality, enriching management programs
  • +Competent and pedagogical teachers
  • +Career readiness and diverse study options
  • +Positive social environment and friendly community
  • +Supportive tutors and successful academic outcomes

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a recurring problem.
  • -Inadequate teaching quality and insufficient advanced courses are a significant concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues are poorly handled.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of practical application and unclear career relevance is a concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Communication problems and poor faculty engagement are major concerns.
  • -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Poor communication from faculty and staff leads to student dissatisfaction.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
  • -Inconsistent or insufficient teaching quality and support are frequently criticized.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners excellent feedback, with its **location** and **student life** achieving the highest marks at 4.63. **Professors** also received strong praise at 4.42. Conversely, **accommodation** and **internationality** represent the areas with the lowest scores, both around 3.84-3.89, indicating potential for improvement in these specific aspects. The overall **value** is rated highly at 4.32.

With identical ratings across all assessed categories, the university presents a uniform, though unexceptional, profile. No specific area stands out as particularly strong or weak. The institution's performance in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value is consistent, indicating a neutral standing across the board. Further review would be needed to understand the nuances behind these equal scores.

This institution presents a varied performance profile, with Student Life standing out as its strongest area, achieving a score of 4.33. Professors and Value also scored highly at 4.19. Conversely, Facilities received the lowest rating at 3.6, indicating this might be an area for improvement. Other aspects like Location, Internationality, and Accommodation fall within a respectable middle range.

This institution garners strong evaluations, particularly excelling in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving perfect scores. Its **Facilities**, **Student Life**, and **Accomodation** are also highly rated, indicating a well-rounded experience. The primary area for improvement lies in its **Professors**, which received a rating of 3, suggesting this aspect could be enhanced. Overall, the university offers good **Value** for students.

This institution receives outstanding marks, particularly for its facilities, location, and student life, all scoring a perfect five. Professors and internationality are also highly regarded, earning 4.5. Accommodation is rated well at 4, making it a strong offering. The primary area for potential improvement lies with accommodation, though still considered very good. Overall, the university presents a compelling and well-rounded profile.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.42/5, around 95% of reviews are positive, highlighting a friendly environment, good quality education, and research opportunities. A small percentage of feedback mentions department limitations and a high-pressure environment.

With a 4.75/5 average from 4 reviews, sentiment is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students praise staff encouragement, good professors, and teaching quality, highlighting opportunities for academic and social growth.

With a 4.25/5 average rating, ~94% of reviews are positive. Students highlight strong academic programs and collaborative lecturers. Minor concerns mentioned include infrastructure and administrative issues.

This university has a 4/5 average rating, with 100% positive feedback. Students praise its inclusivity and diverse student body. The Global Bachelor in Management program is highlighted as a rich and well-taught course.

With two positive reviews, students praised career readiness and social opportunities. They also highlighted supportive mentors and tutors, contributing to a perfect 5/5 average rating. No negative feedback was recorded.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
53%
75%
38%
0%
100%
0%
0%
4★
42%
25%
50%
100%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
13%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
5%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
I've always loved this campus

Sylhet's Shahjalal University of Science and Technology (SUST) is a well-known university that has made significant growth. Various academic and extracurricular activities have elevated this university to national and worldwide prominence. Teachers and students participate in a variety of programs to help the institution become a centre of excellence. I got every opportunity to learn a lot as a computer science student.

Low tuition fees university

Affordable university and here if you are not able to have a place for practical work internship, the school can help you with an internship placement at any of the available companies in the region. Also, i was able to learn a new language ( French ).

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close