King's College London vs London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs City St George’s, University of London - City vs Falmouth University vs University of Plymouth
Side-by-side comparison from 861 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive professors and academic excellence
- +Vibrant student life and diverse international community
- +Strong balance of theory and practical application
- +Expert, approachable faculty and high-quality teaching
- +Strong career preparation and marketable skills development
- +Excellent facilities and a supportive learning environment
- +Strong academic programs and knowledgeable, supportive staff.
- +Excellent location with easy transport and surrounding amenities.
- +Positive environment, good social life, and valuable career support.
- +Hands-on experience and industry opportunities
- +Supportive faculty and accessible help
- +Flexible course structure and modern facilities
- +Engaging and supportive lecturers with real-world expertise
- +Modern, well-equipped facilities and strong academic programs
- +Vibrant city location and convenient student amenities
- +Welcoming environment & community building
- +Strong academic programs & practical learning
- +Excellent student support & career guidance
- +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
- +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
- +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant problem.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of investment in them are disappointing.
- -High tuition fees are not perceived as being reflected in the quality of education or resources.
- -Poor teaching quality and unclear learning expectations.
- -Lack of structure and significant workload.
- -Disappointing careers service and limited social life.
- -Poor quality of teaching and academic standards.
- -Unfulfilled promises regarding education and career preparation.
- -Perceived focus on financial gain over student learning.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are consistently criticized.
- -Course content is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
- -Administrative & management issues are a common source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently criticized.
- -Lack of effective communication and support from staff is a significant complaint.
- -Program structure is poorly designed and lacks practical application.
- -Courses are irrelevant and do not prepare students for job markets.
- -Lack of career support and teaching staff unsupportive.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
- -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
The university garners excellent scores in several key areas, notably excelling in Location with a rating of 4.82 and Internationality at 4.62. Facilities and Professors also received strong marks. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, rated at 3.56. Value and Student Life are rated moderately well, indicating areas for potential improvement.
This institution demonstrates remarkable strengths in its **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving scores nearing 4.8. **Professors** also score highly at 4.26. Conversely, **Student Life** is the lowest-rated area, with a score of 3.64, followed by **Accomodation** at 3.79. Other aspects like Facilities and Value fall within a solid mid-range.
Overall, the university demonstrates a strong performance, particularly excelling in its Facilities and Internationality, both scoring above 4.3. Professors also received a commendable rating. Areas for potential improvement lie in Accomodation, which received the lowest score of the surveyed categories. Student Life and Location are rated moderately, with Value also falling within a similar range.
This institution demonstrates a strong showing in key areas, with **Facilities** receiving the highest rating at 4.24. **Professors** and **Student Life** also score well, both exceeding 4.1. Notably, **Accomodation** emerges as the area with the lowest rating, registering at 3.76. Other aspects like Location, Internationality, and Value are all rated solidly around the 4.0 mark.
Overall, the university garners solid reviews. Its **location** is particularly lauded, receiving the highest score. **Student life** and **facilities** also rate highly, indicating a vibrant and well-equipped campus environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the weakest area, suggesting room for improvement in student housing. Ratings for professors, internationality, and value fall within the good to very good range.
This university garners particularly strong scores in **Location** (4.55) and **Student Life** (4.48), indicating positive student experiences in these aspects. Facilities also receive a high mark at 4.42. The **Accommodation** category shows the lowest rating at 4.02, suggesting this is an area that could be improved, though it remains a respectable score overall. Internationality, Professors, and Value are all rated positively in the low to mid-4s.
This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.
With ~74% positive reviews and an average rating of 4.16/5, students highlight versatile degrees, supportive professors, and a vibrant international community. A very small amount of feedback noted administrative slowness and a degree focus not matching its title.
Nearly 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting a supportive environment, knowledgeable faculty, and excellent facilities. A small percentage (around 3.4%) mention issues like poor lecturing, inconsistent grading, and lack of social life.
With an average rating of 4.31/5 from 104 reviews, ~92% of students are positive. Recurring themes praise knowledgeable staff, good course content, ideal city-centre locations, and employability support. A small ~2% expressed dissatisfaction with teaching quality and course focus.
Nearly all of the 46 reviews are positive, highlighting supportive faculty and excellent facilities. Students appreciate the hands-on experience and opportunities offered, with no negative feedback recorded.
~83% of 29 reviews are positive (4-5 stars). Students praise the university's location, modern facilities, and supportive staff. No negative feedback was recorded.
The university receives high praise (~79%) for its welcoming atmosphere, hands-on learning, and career support. A small portion of feedback (~5.5%) mentions issues with program structure and job prospects.
Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.
Versatile degree with many potential teaching pathways and career options. However a degree focused a lot on social studies rather than culture and media. There should be more of a focus on this given the degree title, making it seem a bit misleading.
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
My time at City University London was truly transformative. The university's vibrant community and diverse extracurricular activities allowed me to forge lifelong friendships and professional connections that extend beyond the classroom. I was impressed by the university's commitment to academic rigor, character development, and personal growth, which created an ideal environment for me to reach my full potential. The research-driven and industry-relevant curriculum provided me with a solid foundation in international business, while the dedicated faculty and staff offered invaluable guidance and support. I feel grateful for the well-rounded education and holistic experience that City University London offered, preparing me for success in my career and beyond.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Overall, my time at Northumbria was ok. Not great just ok. My time was influenced by the COVID outbreak and so my final year was all online. Through my second and final year there was a lack of support from tutors. Not only that I had extenuating circumstances which were ignored when appealing my final grade.
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
