IU International University of Applied Sciences vs Leuphana University of Lüneburg vs Lübeck University of Applied Sciences vs University of Lübeck vs Schiller International University
Side-by-side comparison from 183 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Flexible online study for work-life balance
- +Modern, intuitive digital platform for easy access
- +Relevant, high-quality educational content
- +Engaging, mentor-like faculty and personalized learning.
- +Innovative, thought-provoking curriculum with a sustainability focus.
- +Supportive and friendly atmosphere fostering personal development.
- +Practical, applied, and real-world-oriented programs
- +Affordable or free tuition
- +Clear and detailed admission and enrollment information
- +Strong research focus and practical project involvement
- +Academically rigorous and well-structured programmes
- +Good student-professor interaction
- +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
- +Opportunities for personal and professional growth
- +Supportive and well-organized academic environment
- +International and diverse student community
- +Interactive and engaging teaching methods
- +Personal and academic growth opportunities
- +Flexible and supportive learning environment
- +Well-structured and high-quality courses
- +Easy-to-use and rewarding platform
- -Slow and unresponsive administrative processes, including grade processing and student support.
- -Poor staff attitude and lack of accountability for errors in student records and applications.
- -Inadequate support and guidance for online students.
- -Poor English proficiency of professors and lectures partially in German.
- -Unwelcoming atmosphere due to disrespectful staff and negative peer interactions.
- -Disappointment with program content and its deviation from advertised offerings.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are often mentioned.
- -Overcrowded classes and a lack of individual attention are concerns.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and poor communication are frustrating.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of engaging teaching methods and uninspired curriculum lead to disinterest.
- -Lack of extracurricular activities and limited internship/job opportunities.
- -Poor campus environment and student engagement.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -A lack of communication and transparency from the institution is prevalent.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a constant concern.
- -Lack of effective communication and support from the institution frustrates students.
This institution garners notable praise in several key areas, with **Internationality** and **Professors** receiving particularly high scores. The **Value** proposition is also well-regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the lowest-rated aspect. Other aspects like Facilities, Location, and Student Life fall within a more moderate range of positive feedback.
Overall, the university receives a mixed but generally positive reception. Student life stands out as its strongest attribute, with an impressive rating of 4.17. Location also scores highly at 3.95. Conversely, the rating for professors is the lowest at 2.83, indicating an area for potential improvement. Other categories like facilities, accommodation, internationality, and value fall within a moderate range.
This institution shines particularly brightly in its location and student life, both receiving a strong 4.5 rating. Value also scores highly at 4.5. Conversely, the professor rating stands out as the weakest area with a 2.5. Facilities, accommodation, and internationality are all rated a solid 3.5.
This institution excels across several key areas, boasting perfect scores for Facilities, Location, Student Life, and Internationality. Professors also receive a strong 4.5 rating, with Value also rated highly at 4.5. Accommodations represent the sole area receiving a slightly lower, though still good, score of 4.
This university garners its highest marks for **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving a near-perfect score. **Professors** are also highly rated, reflecting strong academic quality. The university's **Value** and **Student Life** also score well. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerges as the weakest area, followed by **Facilities**, indicating room for improvement in these aspects of the student experience.
Remarkably high scores characterize this university's offerings. Professors receive exceptional praise, closely followed by strong marks for location and student life. Accommodations are the lowest-rated category, though still at a respectable level. Other areas like facilities, internationality, and value also garnered positive feedback, indicating a well-rounded experience.
This university garners exceptional scores in **Professors** and **Value**, indicating excellent teaching quality and a worthwhile investment. Conversely, **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Student Life** received zero ratings, suggesting significant areas for improvement. The institution also demonstrates a strong commitment to **Internationality**, achieving a high score in this domain.
~95% of reviews are positive, praising flexibility, modern platforms, and accessible materials. A small percentage (~5%) mention issues with grading delays and slow administrative support.
Most students find the university enriching, with engaging classes and supportive mentors. Some highlight its unique sustainability focus and welcoming atmosphere. A smaller portion of feedback mentions issues with professors' English proficiency and unwelcoming program experiences.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating from two reviews, students highlight the program's practical, applied nature and its focus on real-world engineering applications. The free tuition is also a significant positive.
With a 5/5 average rating from two reviews, sentiment is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight well-structured programs, research-oriented learning with practical applications, and strong professor-student interaction as key strengths. No negative feedback was provided.
With an average rating of 4.57/5 from 14 reviews, ~93% are positive, praising diverse classes, educators, and global peer networks. A single negative review (~7%) found it suitable only for those seeking an easy degree with limited extracurriculars.
All 31 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.68/5. Students highlight the enriching international environment and innovative, interactive teaching that fosters personal growth and critical thinking.
The sole review is overwhelmingly positive, highlighting flexible online study, supportive staff, and well-structured, rewarding courses on an easy-to-use platform. Negative feedback is negligible.
My experience with IU is very wonderful and exceptional. The learning process is smooth and easy especially for online students and the exams are well tailored to test your knowledge on what you have been learning. It is quite great indeed.
Perhaps, it was my most disapointing experience of studying abroad. What was meant to be Liberal Arts and Sciences, at the end was the opposite of it. Completely disrepsectful attitudes of stuff created very unwelcoming atmosphere. I wouldn't recommend this programme to any of my friends. Regarding the fellow-students, it was neither appealing. They could look at me pejoratively or just say 'Ou, it's you?..". It was the most racist programme and I regret I got to know people I met there, including stuff. They looked down upon me and compeletely ignored my opinions, feelings. In total, very racist place, and fascist. Regarding you career opportunities, you can ask your stuff, but I wish people who work there now, would work in what was meant to be Liberal Arts and Sciences. Stuff and honestly, fellow-students rather represented for me fashist arts and sciences. It was most humiliating, degrading ,disgusting experience in all my life. I'm surprised that this kind of attitudes can be met in the European university. Maybe you can try your luck in other Leuphana programmes: I had sometimes great experinces with professors and students from other faculties, but B.A. Studium Individuale is the most racist, fascist, worst place I've ever been. Till now, very unpleasant aftertaste from all people I met there.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
I am currently a 3rd year student at Forward College and I have thoroughly enjoyed the experience and would recommend it to other students. The interactive approach of Forward where questions, debate, and discussion were encouraged enhanced my learning so much and I feel like I genuinely enjoyed every class. Having the experience of living in 3 different cultures, surrounded by people from all over the world made this experience even more special and helped me develop and grow in so many ways. Another aspect I have loved are the professors. Speaking with friends at other university I am so grateful to have teachers that actually know us, are excited to teach and interact with us, and will always take the time to help you.
Nothing to show
