EU Business School vs WHU - Otto Beisheim School of Management vs IU International University of Applied Sciences vs Kühne Logistics University - KLU vs Leuphana University of Lüneburg
Side-by-side comparison from 424 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Diverse international environment and networking opportunities
- +Experienced, knowledgeable, and supportive professors with real-world insights
- +Innovative and practical business programs
- +Excellent faculty and practical learning experiences
- +International exposure and real-world business cases
- +Engaging program with opportunities for skill development and creativity
- +Flexible online study for work-life balance
- +Modern, intuitive digital platform for easy access
- +Relevant, high-quality educational content
- +Supportive people and approachable professors
- +Practical, real-world learning experiences
- +Strong networking and international community
- +Engaging, mentor-like faculty and personalized learning.
- +Innovative, thought-provoking curriculum with a sustainability focus.
- +Supportive and friendly atmosphere fostering personal development.
- +Culturally diverse environment and international campus access
- +Supportive and organized academic environment with helpful instructors
- +Opportunities for career advancement and independent learning
- +Engaging learning environment with interactive methods
- +Diverse and international student community
- +Unique multi-city European study experience
- -Administrative disorganization and unhelpful staff cause significant problems.
- -The quality of education and academic rigor are considered poor.
- -Facilities and extracurricular support are severely lacking.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are consistently criticized.
- -Slow and unresponsive administrative processes, including grade processing and student support.
- -Poor staff attitude and lack of accountability for errors in student records and applications.
- -Inadequate support and guidance for online students.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently criticized.
- -Administrative issues, including poor communication and disorganized processes, are a major source of frustration.
- -Lack of practical application and relevance in the curriculum disappoints students.
- -Poor English proficiency of professors and lectures partially in German.
- -Unwelcoming atmosphere due to disrespectful staff and negative peer interactions.
- -Disappointment with program content and its deviation from advertised offerings.
- -Lack of extracurriculars and limited opportunities for lower-year students.
- -Poor campus environment and a perceived low academic standard.
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a concern.
- -Lack of transparency and communication is prevalent.
Based on the provided ratings, this institution excels in **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving a high score of 4.7. **Student Life** is also a strong point, rated at 4.22. The university's weakest area is **Accomodation**, which scores 3.44, indicating room for improvement in this aspect. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded experience with standout features.
Overall, this university garners very positive feedback. Its strongest aspects include excellent Facilities, Professors, and Location, all scoring a high 4.5. Value is also rated highly at 4.5. Areas with slightly lower scores are Student Life and Internationality, both at 3.5. Accommodations received a solid 4.
This institution garners notable praise in several key areas, with **Internationality** and **Professors** receiving particularly high scores. The **Value** proposition is also well-regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the lowest-rated aspect. Other aspects like Facilities, Location, and Student Life fall within a more moderate range of positive feedback.
Examining the provided ratings reveals a university excelling in several key aspects. Its location stands out with an impressive score of 4.89, closely followed by strong performance in internationality (4.8), facilities (4.6), student life (4.6), and professors (4.65). However, accommodation presents a clear area for improvement, scoring significantly lower at 3.25, while value remains solid at 4.55.
Overall, the university receives a mixed but generally positive reception. Student life stands out as its strongest attribute, with an impressive rating of 4.17. Location also scores highly at 3.95. Conversely, the rating for professors is the lowest at 2.83, indicating an area for potential improvement. Other categories like facilities, accommodation, internationality, and value fall within a moderate range.
With a strong emphasis on location and internationality, this university also scores very well for its professors and student life. Value for money is also a positive aspect. The weakest areas, while still respectable, are its facilities and accommodation.
This university garners excellent reviews, particularly excelling in its **professors and location**, both achieving perfect scores. Student life and internationality also stand out with scores above 4.7. Areas with slightly lower, though still strong, ratings include **facilities and accommodation**. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded positive student experience with high marks across most aspects.
~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting diversity, experienced professors, and networking opportunities. A small minority of ~7.7% of feedback mentions disorganization and basic course content.
The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (100% positive reviews) with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students highlight experienced professors, a strong mix of theory and practical application, and enjoyable staff and fellow students.
~95% of reviews are positive, praising flexibility, modern platforms, and accessible materials. A small percentage (~5%) mention issues with grading delays and slow administrative support.
With an average rating of 4.76/5, ~100% of reviews are positive. Students highlight supportive professors, a personal learning environment with small classes, and practical, real-world experiences. No negative feedback was recorded.
Most students find the university enriching, with engaging classes and supportive mentors. Some highlight its unique sustainability focus and welcoming atmosphere. A smaller portion of feedback mentions issues with professors' English proficiency and unwelcoming program experiences.
With a 4.54/5 average rating, nearly all students praise Schiller for its culturally rich environment and global opportunities. A small portion of feedback (~7.7%) suggests the university may be better suited for those seeking a less demanding academic path.
Students highly praise the interactive learning, international community, and opportunities for academic and personal growth. There are no negative reviews.
Although I earned my bachelor degree at the University of York in UK, it was quite theoretical. I really started to bridge the learning gap between theory and practice only when I started to pursue my master degree in Business Analytics and Data Science at EU Business School in Barcelona. What stands out most in my current program is the university’s strong emphasis on practical experience. Our professors are not only scholars but also are successful business managers and data experts, as they are either the owners of successful organizations or individuals who took on top management roles in large corporations. Their teachings are more than just the syllabus in, they also provide personal experience in the area of niche markets, provide best practices in an industry, and always provoke our thinking with regard to the existing trends in higher education, business strategy, and innovation.
Amazing program, it provides the perfect blend and opportunity to learn skills and also explore your creativity. Most professors are very experienced and well known within their field of expertise. Some are outstanding and provide you with great knowledge. There is a lot of emphases given to practical learning and group projects. WHU staff, as well as students, were good fun.
My experience with IU is very wonderful and exceptional. The learning process is smooth and easy especially for online students and the exams are well tailored to test your knowledge on what you have been learning. It is quite great indeed.
My experience at KLU has truly been life-changing. This university has given me a second chance and opened the door to a completely new life filled with opportunities. From the very beginning, it has felt like a second home. What makes KLU so special is the people. Every single person here is supportive and genuinely willing to help. The professors are not only highly qualified and professional, but also approachable and always ready to guide you in any academic or professional matter. I have never been in a place like this before. The strong connection with industry, the quality of events, and the incredible network of classmates and alumni create the perfect environment for both personal and professional growth. I will always be grateful to KLU for everything I have experienced here.
Perhaps, it was my most disapointing experience of studying abroad. What was meant to be Liberal Arts and Sciences, at the end was the opposite of it. Completely disrepsectful attitudes of stuff created very unwelcoming atmosphere. I wouldn't recommend this programme to any of my friends. Regarding the fellow-students, it was neither appealing. They could look at me pejoratively or just say 'Ou, it's you?..". It was the most racist programme and I regret I got to know people I met there, including stuff. They looked down upon me and compeletely ignored my opinions, feelings. In total, very racist place, and fascist. Regarding you career opportunities, you can ask your stuff, but I wish people who work there now, would work in what was meant to be Liberal Arts and Sciences. Stuff and honestly, fellow-students rather represented for me fashist arts and sciences. It was most humiliating, degrading ,disgusting experience in all my life. I'm surprised that this kind of attitudes can be met in the European university. Maybe you can try your luck in other Leuphana programmes: I had sometimes great experinces with professors and students from other faculties, but B.A. Studium Individuale is the most racist, fascist, worst place I've ever been. Till now, very unpleasant aftertaste from all people I met there.
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
I am currently a 3rd year student at Forward College and I have thoroughly enjoyed the experience and would recommend it to other students. The interactive approach of Forward where questions, debate, and discussion were encouraged enhanced my learning so much and I feel like I genuinely enjoyed every class. Having the experience of living in 3 different cultures, surrounded by people from all over the world made this experience even more special and helped me develop and grow in so many ways. Another aspect I have loved are the professors. Speaking with friends at other university I am so grateful to have teachers that actually know us, are excited to teach and interact with us, and will always take the time to help you.
