Brand Academy – University of Applied Sciences vs Hamburg University of Applied Sciences vs Kühne Logistics University - KLU vs University of Applied Sciences Europe vs Hochschule Fresenius
Side-by-side comparison from 37 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Quality teaching and environment
- +Strong academic and career focus
- +Dedicated professors and engaging sustainability focus
- +Positive campus atmosphere and events
- +Supportive faculty and student engagement
- +Supportive people and approachable professors
- +Practical, real-world learning experiences
- +Strong networking and international community
Nothing to show
- +Relevant and varied course content
- +Helpful and educated faculty
- +Supportive university staff
Nothing to show
- +Hands-on learning and practical application focus
- +International and multicultural environment
- +Personalized attention and smaller class sizes
- -Disorganized administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and resources.
- -Lack of support and engaging teaching.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are often criticized.
- -Overcrowded classes and insufficient support services are common complaints.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently criticized.
- -Administrative issues, including poor communication and disorganized processes, are a major source of frustration.
- -Lack of practical application and relevance in the curriculum disappoints students.
Nothing to show
- -Lack of organization and clear communication from administration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
- -Uninspiring teaching methods and irrelevant curriculum.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor organization and miscommunication.
- -Outdated teaching methods and inadequate facilities.
- -Lack of academic integrity and student support.
This institution garners a perfect score of 5 across all assessed categories. Its strengths are exceptionally broad, encompassing facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value. There are no discernible weak areas based on these ratings. The university presents a uniformly excellent picture for prospective students.
This institution excels in several key areas, with professors and student life receiving particularly strong scores. Internationality and value also stand out as notable strengths. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest aspect of the university's offerings. Facilities and location are rated moderately, falling between the strongest and weakest points.
Examining the provided ratings reveals a university excelling in several key aspects. Its location stands out with an impressive score of 4.89, closely followed by strong performance in internationality (4.8), facilities (4.6), student life (4.6), and professors (4.65). However, accommodation presents a clear area for improvement, scoring significantly lower at 3.25, while value remains solid at 4.55.
Nothing to show
With a perfect score of 5, location stands out as the university's strongest asset. Student life, however, received the lowest rating at 3.33. Facilities and internationality scored a respectable 3.67, while professors and value were rated highly at 4. Accommodations were rated at 3.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in **internationality**, receiving a high rating of 4. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as a significant area for improvement, with the lowest score of 1.4. Other aspects like location and professors show moderate performance.
The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback with a 5/5 average rating. The sole review highlights excellent teaching and a supportive environment, contributing to a ~100% positive sentiment.
With an average rating of 4.33/5, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~67%). Students praise dedicated professors and impactful sustainability initiatives. Some suggest improvements to dining facilities and lecture duration.
With an average rating of 4.76/5, ~100% of reviews are positive. Students highlight supportive professors, a personal learning environment with small classes, and practical, real-world experiences. No negative feedback was recorded.
Nothing to show
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%) with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise course content, helpful lecturers, and good accommodation. A few minor criticisms mention strict grading in one course and occasional unhelpful teachers.
Nothing to show
Reviews indicate a 3/5 average rating, with ~60% positive feedback highlighting practical, hands-on learning and a multicultural environment. Negative feedback, ~40%, points to poor organization, miscommunication, and outdated teaching methods.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
My experience at KLU has truly been life-changing. This university has given me a second chance and opened the door to a completely new life filled with opportunities. From the very beginning, it has felt like a second home. What makes KLU so special is the people. Every single person here is supportive and genuinely willing to help. The professors are not only highly qualified and professional, but also approachable and always ready to guide you in any academic or professional matter. I have never been in a place like this before. The strong connection with industry, the quality of events, and the incredible network of classmates and alumni create the perfect environment for both personal and professional growth. I will always be grateful to KLU for everything I have experienced here.
Nothing to show
Basically, it’s a private university with a good reputation and also the lecturers are well educated and helpful. The course contains 60% of management-related modules and the remaining technical modules. For anyone who is searching for a techno-management course, I would suggest Hochschule Fresenius.
Nothing to show
Throughout my Studies, in the Communication Design Course at this university located in Berlin, I have experienced a lot of problems. The university is very poorly organized, there is constant miscommunication between staff and students. It is very hard to come in contact with the university over email or phone, and most of the time your issue is never resolved. An excuse they often times use, is that they are understaffed, or it’s the students' fault. I think the campus in Berlin is kind of scam, because when applying or looking up this University the only photos you can see are from their facility located in Hamburg. Which is a much nicer facility than the one in Berlin. Definitely visit before signing any contracts. When I joined the university I expected at least one course to provide the necessary skills and information for this course. There was no introductory class for how to use Adobe software, no tutorial classes on any of the skills we needed during our studies. This is very much a do it yourself at home Programme. It is very hard to get help from the staff as they are often very misleading as no information is communicated to them. I have graduated 2 months ago and I still have no received a diploma.
