London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs University of Surrey vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs Surrey Business School vs The University of Law Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 590 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Expert faculty and high-quality teaching
- +Supportive and collaborative learning environment
- +Diverse assessment methods and flexible study options
- +Knowledgeable and helpful tutors/professors
- +Accessible online course materials and study resources
- +Positive campus environment and social opportunities
- +Connecting theory to practice through real-world cases.
- +Diverse international environment and global opportunities.
- +Relevant industry-focused courses and knowledgeable faculty.
- +Strong academic programmes and career support
- +Supportive and connected community
- +Excellent employability outcomes and internship opportunities
- +Supportive staff and wellbeing resources
- +Smooth application process and fast feedback
- +Career coaching and employable skills development
- +exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable, approachable instructors
- +strong emphasis on precision, quality, and professional skill development
- +welcoming environment and supportive alumni network
- +Practical, industry-focused education and connections
- +Diverse contemporary music programs and courses
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of structure in courses are recurring issues.
- -Insufficient social life and a judgmental environment are frequently mentioned complaints.
- -Inconsistent grading, administrative inefficiencies, and inadequate student support services are significant concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern.
- -Policies and favoritism disadvantage non-Chinese students.
- -Negative campus culture and corruption are prevalent.
- -Perceived as a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources frustrate students.
- -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues caused significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance were major drawbacks.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty was a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of career support and industry relevance leads to dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues frequently disrupt student experience.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder practical learning opportunities.
- -Limited career support and industry connections fail to prepare graduates.
This institution receives its highest marks for **Internationality** (4.80) and **Location** (4.78), indicating a significant global presence and desirable setting. **Professors** are also highly rated (4.26). Areas with the lowest scores are **Student Life** (3.63) and **Accomodation** (3.79), suggesting potential room for improvement in these aspects of the student experience, while **Facilities** (4.04) and **Value** (4.04) fall into a mid-range performance.
With ratings generally above 4.5, this institution demonstrates considerable strengths across its offerings. Facilities stand out as the highest-rated area, closely followed by Professors and Internationality. While Accommodation receives a strong score, it represents the relatively weakest area compared to other metrics, though still indicative of a positive experience.
This institution performs well across most aspects, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest area. Facilities, Professors, and Value also receive high marks. Areas for potential improvement include **Location**, which scored the lowest, and Accomodation. Student life and the overall value proposition are rated solidly in the mid-to-high range.
This institution demonstrates a very strong performance across nearly all aspects, with particular excellence noted in Facilities, Location, Accommodation, and Internationality, all scoring exceptionally high. Student Life and Professors also receive commendable ratings. The weakest area, though still positive, is Value, indicating room for improvement in that specific domain compared to its other strengths.
This institution shines in several key areas, boasting perfect scores for its facilities and location, alongside excellent marks for internationality and value. Student life receives a solid rating. However, accommodation stands out as a weaker point, scoring significantly lower than other aspects. Professors are also highly regarded.
This institution receives high marks for its Location, scoring 4.78, and for its Professors and Internationality, both at 4.67. Facilities also rate well at 4.56. Student Life and Value are both solid at 4.00. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a rating of 3.22.
This institution shows a mixed performance according to recent ratings. Its strongest areas are **Student Life** (3.0), followed by **Internationality** (2.5). Conversely, **Accomodation** (2.0) and **Value** (2.25) represent the weakest aspects. Facilities, Professors, and Location all received a middling 2.75.
~78% of reviews are positive, highlighting expert faculty, academic reputation, and community. A small ~3.4% of feedback is negative, citing concerns about teaching quality and careers services.
Overwhelmingly positive feedback (97%) praises knowledgeable staff, accessible online course content, and a great campus experience with social and study spaces. One negative review expressed concerns about university management and policies.
Most reviews (approximately 71%) highlight a positive learning atmosphere, inspiring professors, and valuable international experiences. A small amount of feedback (around 14%) suggests mediocrity and a focus on profit. The average rating is 3.86/5.
With a 4.8/5 average rating from 25 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight excellent programs, impactful professors, and strong career outcomes, including high employability. No negative feedback was recorded.
All five reviews are positive, with students praising supportive staff and departments, smooth application processes, and helpful career coaching. Resources like a large library and advance module content are also highlighted.
All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight exceptional teaching quality and knowledgeable instructors, along with impeccable facilities. The curriculum and emphasis on precision are frequently praised.
University student reviews are mixed, with an average rating of 3/5. While one review is positive, another 25% expressed negative sentiment.
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
I just saw this link on the Surrey alumnis page. I thought it was really cool to have the opportunity to share my experience. Congratulations Eduopinions for the work. I studied in Surrey a few years ago, I graduated in 2000 and I think the university has changed a lot since then. However, I can say that I loved studying in Surrey and that my daughter is now studying there too!
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
It’s a good place to study with lots of activities to do do and with a lot of useful resources as they have a 4 floor library which is great to find studies or even a quite place to study. The modules are set out perfectly with all the content already put up in advance for the students to have a look at so that they can study in advance and have a look through before lessons.
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
Nothing to show
