ESCI School of International Studies vs IESE Business School vs Universitat CEU Abat Oliba - CEU UAO vs BAU Centro Universitario de Artes y Diseño de Barcelona vs UIC Barcelona
Side-by-side comparison from 175 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Friendly, responsive, and qualified faculty
- +Engaging and enjoyable classes with up-to-date programs
- +Strong community and diverse, inclusive campus environment
- +Inspiring cultural experiences and inclusive communities
- +Strong career advancement opportunities and alumni networks
- +High-quality academics and excellent faculty engagement
- +Practical, industry-connected curriculum
- +Expert lecturers with real-world experience
- +Supportive professor-student relationships
- +Industry-expert professors and practical, real-world projects
- +Diverse, multicultural student environment promoting collaboration
- +Comprehensive and complete programs covering various creative skills
- +Excellent academic quality and well-prepared graduates
- +Supportive and international student community
- +Engaging and knowledgeable faculty
- +Inspiring creative environment with practical, hands-on learning.
- +Strong international community and networking with professionals.
- +Engaging projects fostering idea realization and interdisciplinary collaboration.
- +Practical, creative, and engaging learning approach
- +Inspiring and supportive teachers with real-world business insights
- +Strong academic programs with global perspectives
- -Disorganized and unclear teaching with lack of individual attention.
- -Program or course content is not as advertised or challenging as expected.
- -Administrative and management issues within the school.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources negatively impact the learning experience.
- -Lack of communication and support from the institution is a recurring problem.
- -Incompetent and unprofessional leadership and management.
- -Poor quality of instruction due to unqualified staff.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently mentioned.
- -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts the learning experience.
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Unhelpful and indifferent staff.
- -Deceptive financial practices.
- -Experiencing unhelpful, expensive education with little practical application or support.
- -Facing a curriculum perceived as irrelevant, overly conceptual, and lacking real-world career preparation.
- -Struggling with unsupportive and inaccessible faculty, especially for those without prior design backgrounds.
- -Poor value for money regarding class hours.
- -Disappointing overall experience not meeting expectations.
This institution garners strong marks across most metrics. Professors and facilities stand out as particular strengths, both exceeding a 4.4 rating. Student life also scores well, alongside location and perceived value. The weakest area identified is internationality, scoring just above 4.0, with accommodation also receiving a lower, though still respectable, score of 4.2.
Overall, the university garners strong student satisfaction. Its most highly rated aspects include Internationality (4.74), Location (4.73), and Student Life (4.70). Professors (4.62) and Value (4.64) also receive excellent scores. The weakest area, though still positive, is Accomodation at 4.09, while Facilities are rated at 4.36.
Across various aspects, the university demonstrates strong performance, particularly in accommodation, which received the highest rating. Facilities, professors, and location also scored well, indicating solid foundational strengths. Student life and internationality received comparatively lower marks, suggesting areas where enhancements could be considered. Overall, the university presents a positive evaluation with a clear standout in its living arrangements.
This institution garners exceptional scores across multiple key aspects, including its facilities, professors, location, student life, internationality, and overall value, all receiving a perfect 5. Conversely, the accommodation received a significantly lower rating of 1, indicating a considerable area for improvement.
Overall, the university garners positive feedback, with **Professors** receiving the highest marks at 4.25, followed closely by **Facilities** at 4.17. **Student Life** is rated a respectable 3.75, while **Internationality** scores 3.83. Areas for potential improvement include **Accomodation**, which received the lowest rating of 3.33, and **Location** at 3.91. The university also scores well in **Value** at 3.92.
Overall, this university garners moderate ratings across various aspects. Its strongest area is **Location**, achieving a high score. Conversely, **Accomodation** is identified as the weakest point, receiving the lowest rating. Other aspects like Professors, Student Life, and Facilities fall within a similar, average range, with Internationality and Value also scoring below average.
The institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its internationality, with a notable 4.79 rating. Professors also receive high marks at 4.74, and value for money is strong at 4.68. Areas for potential improvement include location and accommodation, both rated at 4.375, representing the lowest scores among the surveyed categories.
With a 4.46/5 average, ~96% of reviews are positive, praising fun learning, qualified faculty, and community. A small ~4% of feedback notes disorganization and unclear expectations.
With a ~100% positive rating, reviews highlight exceptional experiences, transformative professional growth, and excellent faculty. Students praise the welcoming culture, global diversity, and strong career connections. No negative feedback was recorded.
With an average rating of 4.29/5 from 17 reviews, ~76% of feedback is positive, highlighting practical learning, professional lecturers, and personal professor relationships. A small amount of negative feedback (~6%) points to poor management and unprofessionalism.
All 3 reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students praise the strong creative foundations, practical projects, and industry-expert professors. The multicultural environment and diverse course offerings were also highlighted.
With a 4.2/5 average rating from 15 reviews, ~93% are positive, highlighting strong academics, supportive classmates, and good job preparation. ~7% of feedback is negative, citing issues with unhelpful administration.
About 57% of reviews highlight a creative, international environment with practical projects and industry connections. However, roughly 43% criticize a pretentious curriculum, a lack of practical skills, and feeling unsupported or that the education is overpriced.
Nearly all reviews are positive, highlighting engaging, creative learning with practical projects and inspiring teachers. A small percentage of feedback expressed dissatisfaction with the value of full-time programs.
ESCI es una escuela de negocios seria, donde existe un contacto cercano entre el alumno y el profesor. Disponen de una alta variedad de clases donde en algunos casos, si es cierto que necesitan terminar de pulir el temario para que resulte mas práctico y aplicable al ámbito laboral. Pero, en la mayoría de casos, ofrecen un temario exigente, riguroso, y una alta calidad de docencia. La escuela es pequeña, por lo que no siempre da la sensación de estar viviendo la experiencia universitaria, pero a la vez esto resulta en un muy agradable ambiente entre los estudiantes. Los puntos fuertes en mi opinión se resumen en: el programa de idiomas, el programa de prácticas, las buenas intalaciones y la gran valoración que tiene el título de negocios y marketing en el mercado.
Being at IESE was one of the best experiences of my life: 1- Professionally: this MBA is one of the best connected schools with top consultancy and banking sectors. for example, the 3 MBBs come to the school to train and interview candidates, ensuring a higher successful rate. It allowed me to jump from a civil engineering position to work for McKinsey. 2- Personal and cultural : amazing transformative 2 years, with people from all over the world (73 nationalities in my class) with great values. Totally worthy it.
Nothing to show
A master of immersive and comprehensive quality focused on people with little or no design knowledge. I had an excellent experience, the only thing that perhaps did not convince me was that the final work is done as a group.
Classes are good, I would try to make them more interactive and with more practices in class. Professors normally are good, in the english course I believe the english of the teachers could be better specially if the course is taught in that language. I also believe professors could interact more with their students and try to get in contact with students they see may be struggling. Otherwise the campus, although a bit small is fine, really nice, the library could be a little bigger.
The way the Departments treat the students are notable and the situation of the University in one of the most important and old part of the city, as well the projects are interesting, we capture all the essence and bring with as a lugagge of experiences
The classes are so intresting I love how they they teach you about psychology and business strategy, I really like how the teachers are real professionals in terms of marketing , buisness... overall I really enjoy it.
