IEM Business School vs Universidad Europea - UE vs Universidad Politécnica de Valencia - UPV vs Universidad CEU Cardenal Herrera - CEU UCH vs Universidad Internacional de Valencia
Side-by-side comparison from 220 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging and effective teaching methods.
- +Personalized learning through small class sizes.
- +Valuable networking opportunities and community.
- +Modern teaching methods and well-equipped facilities
- +Strong focus on practical learning and career opportunities
- +Supportive faculty and enriching academic environment
- +Excellent academic programs and teaching quality
- +Vibrant student life and city atmosphere
- +Strong student support and facilities
- +Practical work experience and career preparation
- +Supportive and passionate faculty
- +Enriching international environment and social connections
- +Flexible online learning accommodates work and life commitments.
- +Supportive professors foster student success and well-being.
- +Well-structured curriculum with accessible materials.
- +Strong academic programs and knowledge acquisition
- +Supportive and professional faculty and staff
- +Effective teaching methods and practical application
Nothing to show
- -Insufficient class level and quality.
- -Poor facility quality.
- -Unresponsive and unhelpful staff.
- -Lack of teacher engagement and support.
- -Financial policies and material costs.
- -Lack of practical multimedia focus and theoretical depth
- -Poor program structure and wasted time/money in later semesters
- -Unresponsive faculty and inadequate project guidance
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Unengaging teaching methods and poor course structure frustrate students.
- -Broken promises and lack of advertised support regarding internships and deadlines.
- -Misleading information about university offerings and agreements.
- -Misleading program length and content
- -Poor organization and administrative issues
- -Invalid certificates and waste of money
Nothing to show
Based on the provided ratings, the university demonstrates a consistent performance across all surveyed areas, with no exceptional strengths or weaknesses identified. Each category, including Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value, received a rating of zero, indicating a uniform absence of positive or negative feedback in these aspects.
This university garners high marks for its internationality, achieving a rating of 4.49. Professors are also well-regarded at 4.21, closely followed by facilities at 4.23 and student life at 4.04. Conversely, accommodation and value received lower scores, at 3.79 and 3.72 respectively, while location sits at 3.98.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its facilities, earning a high score of 4.54. Location and student life also receive very positive marks, both exceeding 4.3. Conversely, the professor rating stands as the weakest area, with a score of 3.69, indicating it has the most room for improvement. Overall, the university presents a strong offering, particularly in its physical environment and social atmosphere.
Across surveyed categories, this institution excels in its **Facilities**, boasting an impressive rating of 4.67. Equally strong are **Student Life** and **Internationality**, both scoring 4.63. **Value** and **Professors** also receive favorable marks around 4.53. The area with the lowest rating is **Location**, at 3.95, indicating it's the primary point for potential improvement. **Accomodation** is rated moderately at 4.11.
This institution demonstrates a relatively even performance across key metrics, with student life emerging as its strongest area, achieving a rating of 3.67. Conversely, location presents the most significant challenge, scoring a considerably lower 2.67. Other aspects like facilities, accommodation, and value are rated moderately at 3. Internationality and professors also fall within this mid-range, with scores of 3.2 and 3.4 respectively.
This institution's strengths lie in its **Location**, scoring a notable 3.79, and its **Internationality**, with a rating of 3.67. Other well-regarded aspects include **Professors** (3.6) and **Value** (3.33). Conversely, **Accomodation** received the lowest marks at 3.14, with **Facilities** and **Student Life** also in the lower range (both 3.21).
Nothing to show
University reviews are largely positive (~74% 4-5 stars) praising personalized attention, enjoyable teaching, and small class sizes. One review (~17%) found the course level too basic.
Most reviews are positive (~96%), highlighting modern teaching methods, practical learning, and job opportunities. A small minority of feedback (~4%) mentions indifferent teachers and material costs.
With a ~90% positive sentiment, students praise the university's academic quality, multicultural environment, and supportive campus. A small minority of feedback noted some outdated course content.
With a 4.44/5 average, 24 out of 25 reviews are positive. Students highlight excellent faculty, good facilities, and valuable real-world work experiences. No negative feedback was reported.
Positive feedback highlights flexible online learning, professor support, and academic rigor. However, ~40% of reviews express dissatisfaction, citing issues with placement agreements and TFM defense dates.
Around 67% of reviews are positive, praising the strong knowledge and professionalism gained. However, about 33% are negative, citing concerns about organization, program duration, and communication.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Excellent university, with experienced professors, professionals in the areas they teach and with an incomparable teacher-student proximity.It is a very good university for International students since thet offer Portuguese classes and some subjects are in English. In terms of infrastructure, despite being small and not having all the conditions and equipment, it brings together a pleasant environment for studying - in addition to very good cleaning conditions and modern rooms. At the administrative level, it is organized. As for the students, many are very interested in being there, excellent students and enormous dedication.
I am Karina, Ecuadorian by birth, Accounting and Audit Engineer by profession. Currently, I am studying a Master in Sports Management, the same one that stands out for its high quality, especially by the outstanding group of teachers present in the course, which is why it has fulfilled 100% with my expectations. As a foreigner, it is a great opportunity for me and it has been possible thanks to the management of the people who are in charge of this course directed and thought for the integral formation of the assistants.
Studying Advertising and public relations at CEU Cardenal Herrera was an enriching and transformative experience. One thing I standout is the combined theoretical and practical skills we learned throughout the career. We work hand on hand with well known brands that give us a profesional view and a bigger understanding of the profesional world. The multicultural environment at CEU help me develop cultural sensibility and open my perspective because of the diverse backgrounds. The most enriching experience was living in the amazing city en Valencia, its stunning architecture and its amazing food. I graduated feeling confident and prepared to enter to the professional world.
Nothing to show
Ive had so many problems with this school>tehy just care about money , after you get in barcelonna even information they just give it if you pay like 200 euros . than the classes> they say you have the option to study online or Presencial but the presential the techer is on her house so it is also online. you dont get any presencial class. aldo if the teacher is in the school she is the same person as the receptionist, the cordiator and director of the course. Classes were poorly organized, with minimal academic content*( if you had any kind of study about the theme you know they dont say anything) and a strong lack of structure. Many subjects were rushed or skipped, and there was little to no real academic guidance.
Nothing to show