ESIC Business & Marketing School vs IEM Business School vs INEDE Business School vs Universidad Europea - UE vs Universidad Politécnica de Valencia - UPV
Side-by-side comparison from 233 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +practical, project-based learning with real companies
- +excellent teaching quality from industry professionals
- +strong academic and personal support from staff
- +Engaging and effective teaching methods.
- +Personalized learning through small class sizes.
- +Valuable networking opportunities and community.
- +Diverse teaching staff and practical venue visits
- +International exchange opportunities
- +Modern teaching and attractive campus
- +Strong business opportunities and practical learning
- +Supportive faculty and international exchange programs
- +Excellent academic programs and teaching quality
- +Vibrant student life and city atmosphere
- +Strong student support and facilities
- +Supportive and patient professors
- +Balanced academic and personal life
- +Strong academic programs and knowledge acquisition
- +Supportive and professional faculty and staff
- +Effective teaching methods and practical application
- -Inadequate administrative and management support, particularly for international students.
- -Misleading information regarding course delivery and lack of proper orientation.
- -Insufficient class level and quality.
- -Poor facility quality.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a consistent complaint.
- -Students express frustration with administrative inefficiencies and poor communication.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or not adequately preparing them for future careers.
- -Unresponsive and unhelpful administrative staff.
- -Teachers are indifferent and unsupportive of student learning.
- -High costs for course materials.
- -Lack of practical multimedia focus and theoretical depth
- -Poor program structure and wasted time/money in later semesters
- -Unresponsive faculty and inadequate project guidance
- -Administrative and management issues lead to unfulfilled promises and significant delays.
- -Lack of essential resources and services, such as internship placements, creates significant problems.
- -Poor communication and failure to follow through on commitments cause student frustration.
- -Misleading program length and content
- -Poor organization and administrative issues
- -Invalid certificates and waste of money
Overall, the university garners positive feedback, with **Facilities** emerging as its strongest asset at 4.1. **Professors** also receive a commendable score of 3.8. Areas rated lower include **Internationality** at 3.5 and **Accomodation** and **Value**, both at 3.6, representing opportunities for improvement. Student life and location also fall within a solid, though not outstanding, range.
Based on the provided ratings, the university demonstrates a consistent performance across all surveyed areas, with no exceptional strengths or weaknesses identified. Each category, including Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value, received a rating of zero, indicating a uniform absence of positive or negative feedback in these aspects.
University performance reveals a consistent theme with zero ratings across all surveyed aspects: Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value. This uniform score indicates no particular strengths or weaknesses stand out. The institution's offering appears undifferentiated across these crucial university experience components.
Overall, the university receives strong marks, particularly in **Internationality (4.6)** and **Facilities (4.33)**. Student Life and Professors also score well, both above 4.2. The weakest areas identified are **Accomodation (3.87)** and **Value (3.78)**, though these still represent a moderately positive rating.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its facilities, earning a high score of 4.54. Location and student life also receive very positive marks, both exceeding 4.3. Conversely, the professor rating stands as the weakest area, with a score of 3.69, indicating it has the most room for improvement. Overall, the university presents a strong offering, particularly in its physical environment and social atmosphere.
This institution presents a mixed profile based on the provided ratings. Student life stands out as a clear strength, receiving the highest score. Conversely, the location is identified as the weakest area. Facilities and accommodation are rated moderately, as is the university's internationality. Professors and the overall value for students fall somewhere in the middle range of scores.
This institution's strengths lie in its **Location**, scoring a notable 3.79, and its **Internationality**, with a rating of 3.67. Other well-regarded aspects include **Professors** (3.6) and **Value** (3.33). Conversely, **Accomodation** received the lowest marks at 3.14, with **Facilities** and **Student Life** also in the lower range (both 3.21).
With an average rating of 4.11/5 from 54 reviews, ~85% are positive, highlighting complete degrees, practical projects with companies, and quality teaching. A very small amount (~2%) of feedback was negative.
University reviews are largely positive (~74% 4-5 stars) praising personalized attention, enjoyable teaching, and small class sizes. One review (~17%) found the course level too basic.
The single review is positive, rating the university 4/5 stars. It highlights the good quality of teachers and mentions opportunities like visiting sports venues and an exchange program in Paris. No negative feedback was received.
Nearly 74% of 54 reviews are positive, highlighting modern teaching methods, spacious campuses, and good career opportunities. A small amount of negative feedback (~3.7%) notes administrative issues and unengaged instructors.
With a ~90% positive sentiment, students praise the university's academic quality, multicultural environment, and supportive campus. A small minority of feedback noted some outdated course content.
Student feedback is split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative reviews. Positive comments highlight supportive professors and academic rigor balanced with well-being. Negative feedback focuses on administrative issues and unfulfilled promises regarding TFM defenses and internship placements.
Around 67% of reviews are positive, praising the strong knowledge and professionalism gained. However, about 33% are negative, citing concerns about organization, program duration, and communication.
Worst university ever, I’m an İNTERNATİONAL student who came just for one semester for ERASMUS from another institution. It was the worst experience ever in my life, Esic university treated me so badly. The ERASMUS coordinator is really disrespectful and he didn’t even do a welcoming day for the new students. We didn’t get any training on how we can adapt to the university's system. First, they told us it is a hybrid system, which is not the case. This is the first lie from a higher education institution. They are really trying to push me to fail administration and also teachers I really feel it’s a religious problem about where I come from , plus I did all of my exams perfectly. Now I’m surprised that one teacher wants me to fail because I didn’t do one exercise ( just one in all semester lol) , my exam was perfect now she doesn’t want to show me my results and told me that she will make me fail because of one exercise. It is not fair and no one from the administration wants to help me as an Erasmus student, but I feel there is a difference between me and Spanish nationalities. Now I will take my legal right. They really discriminated against me in every way I’m really sad how I got used and treated this badly and also this issue has now become a personal issue, I really don’t recommend any İNTERNATİONAL students to join ESIC Valencia it’s the worst university on planet earth 😡
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Excellent university, with experienced professors, professionals in the areas they teach and with an incomparable teacher-student proximity.It is a very good university for International students since thet offer Portuguese classes and some subjects are in English. In terms of infrastructure, despite being small and not having all the conditions and equipment, it brings together a pleasant environment for studying - in addition to very good cleaning conditions and modern rooms. At the administrative level, it is organized. As for the students, many are very interested in being there, excellent students and enormous dedication.
I am Karina, Ecuadorian by birth, Accounting and Audit Engineer by profession. Currently, I am studying a Master in Sports Management, the same one that stands out for its high quality, especially by the outstanding group of teachers present in the course, which is why it has fulfilled 100% with my expectations. As a foreigner, it is a great opportunity for me and it has been possible thanks to the management of the people who are in charge of this course directed and thought for the integral formation of the assistants.
Nothing to show
Ive had so many problems with this school>tehy just care about money , after you get in barcelonna even information they just give it if you pay like 200 euros . than the classes> they say you have the option to study online or Presencial but the presential the techer is on her house so it is also online. you dont get any presencial class. aldo if the teacher is in the school she is the same person as the receptionist, the cordiator and director of the course. Classes were poorly organized, with minimal academic content*( if you had any kind of study about the theme you know they dont say anything) and a strong lack of structure. Many subjects were rushed or skipped, and there was little to no real academic guidance.
