Czech Technical University in Prague - CVUT vs Technical University of Ostrava - VSB vs Rochester Institute of Technology - RIT vs Tomas Bata University in Zlín - UTB vs Anglo-American University - AAU
Side-by-side comparison from 180 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Expert faculty & modern, practical curriculum
- +Strong career support & global recognition
- +Well-regarded technical programs
- +Excellent study environment and facilities
- +Engaging student life and activities
- +Strong academic programs and resources
- +Supportive faculty and engaging academic environment
- +Modern facilities and vibrant campus life
- +Welcoming atmosphere and diverse community
Nothing to show
- +International and vibrant student environment
- +Approachable and helpful professors
- +Practical learning and skill development
- +Transformative learning experiences and career purpose
- +Dedicated professors, critical thinking, and open dialogue
- +Vibrant student community and lifelong connections
- +Strong community and supportive teachers.
- +Modern campus and facilities.
- +Abundant extracurricular activities and personal development opportunities.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of effective communication and transparency is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
- -Outdated facilities and resources negatively impact the learning environment.
- -Lack of communication and support from the institution is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a common complaint.
- -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts the learning experience.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues create significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring problem.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly implemented.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are common complaints.
- -Poor communication and a lack of transparency from the institution are prevalent concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
- -Lack of essential resources hinders learning.
This institution garners high marks for its **Facilities**, scoring a notable 4.46. Professors, student life, and overall value are also well-regarded, all receiving a consistent 4.31. Internationality sits at a solid 4.0. The weakest area identified is **Accomodation**, which received a rating of 3.85, indicating room for improvement in this aspect.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its facilities and internationality, both scoring a high 4.75. Student life, location, and accommodation also receive positive feedback with a 4.5 rating. Professors are rated a strong 4.5 as well. The weakest area, though still good, is value at 4.25.
Across key metrics, this institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Professors** and **Internationality**, both receiving scores above 4.35. **Student Life** also garners excellent feedback, close behind. Conversely, the **Location** receives the lowest rating among the surveyed areas. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Accomodation**, and **Value** fall within a good, solid range, indicating a generally positive but varied student experience.
Nothing to show
Considerable strengths are evident in the university's location and student life, both receiving high marks. Internationality and professors also score very favorably. The facilities and value for money are well-regarded, demonstrating a generally positive student experience. Accommodation stands out as the area with the lowest, though still respectable, rating.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in its **location**, earning a perfect score. Its **facilities**, **professors**, and **internationality** are also well-regarded, all receiving strong ratings. Conversely, areas such as **student life** and **accommodation** present opportunities for improvement, as indicated by their moderate scores. The overall **value** also lands in the middle tier, reflecting a mixed but generally positive assessment.
Professors stand out with an impressive rating, reflecting a particular strength in academic instruction. The university also scores highly in location and value. Accommodation presents the lowest score, indicating a potential area for improvement compared to other aspects of the student experience. Overall, the institution demonstrates a solid, well-rounded performance.
With an average rating of 4.31/5 from 16 reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students praise good teachers, useful projects, and career help, noting high-quality, modern education and opportunities for internships and jobs.
All five reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.4/5. Students praise the study environment, teachers, facilities, and student life, highlighting well-stocked libraries, modern labs, and good recreational spaces.
With an average rating of 4.18/5 from 39 reviews, approximately 93% of feedback is highly positive. Students frequently praise academic rigor, faculty support, modern facilities, and a vibrant campus life. No negative reviews were recorded.
Nothing to show
All 74 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.53/5. Students highlight the international environment and helpful professors as key strengths. There is no negative feedback.
This university receives a highly positive rating of 4/5 from its students. The single review highlights transformative academic experiences, supportive professors, and a vibrant student community with ample opportunities for involvement and connection.
With a 4.8/5 average rating from 45 reviews, students praise the strong sense of community, wonderful professors, and modern, welcoming campus. There are no reported negative experiences.
Firstly, I would like to mention that CVUT is one of the best unis in Czech Republic. After graduating it gives a plenty of opportunities to work since its certificate is recognised around the world in huge companies. It’s not a secret that not all of the students can work while studying, it’s quite difficult to study there but it worth it. Inside, every faculty’s building is modern. Especially FIT, where I am studying now looks great. Professors and tutors create opportunity to study, they can answer to all your questions if there are. Secondly, getting to the uni is not that difficult even if you live far from it. Transportation in public is so developed and trams can get you anywhere quickly. For instance, I am living in Prague 3 and uni is located in Prague 6, even though in map it the distance could be seen so far, by using tram I get to the uni in 20-30 minutes. To sum up, it can be difficult to study there and subject can be hard too but it worth it since after it creates you a huge opportunity to work in successful companies without any doubt.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I can say I am completely different from before and after AAU. At some point I wondered but now without even noticing I can see my knowledge has improved a lot. I say seamless because it is not the traditional type of learning, you learn through hands on projects, in class discussions, real world scenarios, interactive sessions and becomes part of your day to day life and interests. I 100% Recommend AAU to anyone who wants to experience a life-long a real international community and learn in the process while having the time of your life in Europe!
Nothing to show
Great sense of community, once you find the right people. The professors are wonderful, especially Dr. Hurtová and Dr. Tomášková. The entire university recently had a massive facelift, so the whole institution feels modern and welcoming.
