University Politehnica of Bucharest - UPB vs National University of Political Studies and Public Administration - SNSPA vs Romanian-American University vs Technical University of Civil Engineering Bucharest vs Romanian-American School Of Business - ASEBUSS
Side-by-side comparison from 81 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Abundant opportunities for professional and personal development.
- +Supportive and approachable professors who facilitate learning.
- +Strong engineering programs with industry interest.
- +Practical, real-world relevance of studies
- +Dedicated, gifted lecturers and useful events
- +Collaborative atmosphere and personal development
- +Excellent, knowledgeable, and approachable professors.
- +Practical and well-structured courses with real-world application.
- +Numerous career, internship, and international exchange opportunities.
- +Strong engineering programs and knowledgeable teachers
- +Accessible location and good transportation links
- +Ample facilities available
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Helpful and supportive teachers
- +Excellent teaching quality
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of student care are prevalent.
- -Outdated facilities and infrastructure are a significant problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Limited course availability and inflexible schedules frustrate students.
- -Constant and disruptive construction noise negatively impacts sleep and living conditions.
- -administrative and management issues
- -outdated facilities and poor maintenance
- -lack of resources and support
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of support for student success and academic advising is a concern.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location**, scoring a high 4.2, and in **Student Life**, with a rating of 3.94. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area, receiving a score of 3.15. Other aspects like Professors, Internationality, and Value fall within a solid mid-range, indicating a generally positive but not exceptional performance in these categories.
Student feedback indicates excellent student life, boasting a top score of 4.725. Facilities also received strong marks at 4.65. Conversely, internationality was the lowest rated aspect, scoring 4.125. Location and accommodation were also areas with slightly lower scores, both at 4.175. Professors and value were rated highly, with scores of 4.625 and 4.475 respectively.
This institution demonstrates a well-rounded performance, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest attribute. Students also rated **Professors** highly. Areas for potential improvement include **Location** and **Accomodation**, which received the lowest scores. Other aspects like Facilities, Student Life, and Value fall within a solid mid-range.
Exceptional strengths are evident in student life, professor quality, and accommodation, all receiving near-perfect scores. The university also scores very well in internationality and value. However, facilities represent a notable area for improvement, with a considerably lower rating compared to other aspects.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Across all assessed aspects, this institution demonstrates outstanding performance, achieving a perfect score of 5 in every area. Notably, its strengths lie uniformly across facilities, professor quality, location desirability, vibrant student life, accommodation provisions, a high degree of internationality, and exceptional value for money. No specific weaknesses are identified, indicating a consistently excellent experience for students.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting ample opportunities and supportive professors. A small fraction of negative feedback (~6%) points to system issues and inconsistent educational standards.
Students consistently praise the university's relevance to social reality and development of teamwork skills. Approximately 100% of feedback is positive, with an average rating of 4.75/5. No negative feedback was recorded.
With an average rating of 4.17/5, ~83% of reviews are positive. Students praise knowledgeable and approachable professors, well-structured curricula, and interactive teaching methods. One negative review mentioned disruptive drilling noise.
With a 4/5 average rating, the single review highlights a positive engineering program and atmosphere. Minor feedback mentioned outdated machinery. Approximately 100% of feedback is positive.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With a 5/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, reviews highlight excellent, helpful teachers. Students appreciate the willingness of instructors to assist and explain course material.
My first year was excellent there, there are a lot of friends you can make and the professors really do help us. I remember going to class and joking about random things with them. The exams are pretty simple because you learn from the class, you don't need pretty much anything when you have people like these around you.
S.N.S.P.A. is a university with students who have a huge potential and an ambition to change the world. The fields you can study here are very connected with the social reality nowadays and they give you a glimpse of what you can change for the better. I recommend it, because teachers here are very gifted and dedicated and they organize for us a lot of events, conferences, competitions, workshops which are very useful.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
