University Politehnica of Bucharest - UPB vs University of Bucharest - UB vs Romanian-American University vs Romanian-American School Of Business - ASEBUSS vs University of Agronomical Sciences and Veterinary Medicine - USAMV

Side-by-side comparison from 117 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: University of Bucharest - UB (4.30)
University Politehnica of Bucharest - UPB: wins 0/7 categories
University of Bucharest - UB: wins 3/7 categories
Romanian-American University: wins 4/7 categories
Romanian-American School Of Business - ASEBUSS: wins 0/7 categories
University of Agronomical Sciences and Veterinary Medicine - USAMV: wins 0/7 categories
'Carol I' National Defence University - UNAp: wins 0/7 categories
Universitatea Bioterra București: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Maths
4.30
Top
Read more reviews
42 reviews
×
Best programme: Mathematics
Best programme: Accounting
Category ratings
Facilities
3.34
3.45
3.98
Win
Not rated
2.45
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.20
4.66
Win
3.82
Not rated
3.45
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
3.59
4.14
4.15
Win
Not rated
3.75
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
3.51
3.66
4.33
Win
Not rated
2.70
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
3.94
4.08
Win
3.97
Not rated
3.30
Not rated
Not rated
Value
3.72
4.08
Win
3.98
Not rated
3.95
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.15
3.32
3.82
Win
Not rated
2.70
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Abundant opportunities for professional and personal development.
  • +Supportive and approachable professors who facilitate learning.
  • +Strong engineering programs with industry interest.
  • +Excellent faculty and learning opportunities
  • +Positive social experience and friendships
  • +Dedicated academic environment
  • +Excellent, knowledgeable, and approachable professors.
  • +Practical and well-structured courses with real-world application.
  • +Numerous career, internship, and international exchange opportunities.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Poor teaching quality and lack of student care are prevalent.
  • -Outdated facilities and infrastructure are a significant problem.
  • -Professors' lack of care and inconvenient schedules.
  • -Administrative and management issues with scholarships.
  • -Constant and disruptive construction noise negatively impacts sleep and living conditions.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location**, scoring a high 4.2, and in **Student Life**, with a rating of 3.94. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area, receiving a score of 3.15. Other aspects like Professors, Internationality, and Value fall within a solid mid-range, indicating a generally positive but not exceptional performance in these categories.

Considering the provided metrics, this institution excels in its **Location**, receiving the highest rating. **Professors**, **Student Life**, and **Value** also demonstrate strong performance. The areas that received lower scores include **Accomodation** and **Facilities**, indicating potential for improvement in these aspects of the university experience.

This institution demonstrates a well-rounded performance, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest attribute. Students also rated **Professors** highly. Areas for potential improvement include **Location** and **Accomodation**, which received the lowest scores. Other aspects like Facilities, Student Life, and Value fall within a solid mid-range.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting ample opportunities and supportive professors. A small fraction of negative feedback (~6%) points to system issues and inconsistent educational standards.

Approximately 97.6% of reviews are positive, praising learning opportunities and professional teachers. A small amount of negative feedback mentions uncaring professors and inconvenient scheduling. The average rating is 4.26 out of 5.

With an average rating of 4.17/5, ~83% of reviews are positive. Students praise knowledgeable and approachable professors, well-structured curricula, and interactive teaching methods. One negative review mentioned disruptive drilling noise.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
24%
50%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
40%
29%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
30%
19%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
2★
6%
2%
17%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
My professors

My first year was excellent there, there are a lot of friends you can make and the professors really do help us. I remember going to class and joking about random things with them. The exams are pretty simple because you learn from the class, you don't need pretty much anything when you have people like these around you.

Good practice, a lot of information but not a lot of job opportunities

It's one of the most active National Universities in our Country located in the center of the Capital City. We had several practices during the Bachelor's and Master's degree. We gathered a lot of useful information and also combined knowledge with practical activities in different locations of the country in the environmental field. We managed to understand the environment and to share our knowledge to people around us but the main problem in our country is that the hiring opportunities in this field are very low. Could be just a national problem and maybe we didn't have the support from the University in order to follow our domain.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close