EADA Business School vs EU Business School vs ESIC Business & Marketing School vs Universitat Oberta de Catalunya - UOC vs EUHT Sant Pol
Side-by-side comparison from 446 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging and interactive learning environment
- +Career impact and professional development opportunities
- +Transformative personal growth and future clarification
- +Expert professors and practical, real-world business applications
- +Strong emphasis on hands-on experience and out-of-class learning
- +Vibrant international student community and engaging campus life
- +practical, project-based learning with real companies
- +excellent teaching quality from industry professionals
- +strong academic and personal support from staff
- +Flexible online learning and self-paced study
- +High-quality teaching materials and organized virtual platform
- +Accessible and supportive professors and tutors
- +Excellent facilities and creative space
- +Access to industry professionals and top restaurants
- +Comprehensive administrative and career-focused curriculum
- +Engaging and supportive instructors
- +Practical and relevant course content
- +Strong community and peer support
- +Supportive & engaged professors, humanistic & diverse environment
- +Practical learning, real-world application, and engaging classes
- +Accessible (affordable, online, evening classes) and helpful support
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant inconvenience.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of promised program focus are disappointing.
- -Lack of flexibility and arbitrary grading create a poor learning experience.
- -Disorganization, poor staff support, and lack of clear academic guidance are significant issues.
- -Educational quality is perceived as basic, with issues in course content, teaching, and study facilities.
- -Administrative problems, lack of accreditation, and a focus on profit over education are recurring complaints.
- -Inadequate administrative and management support, particularly for international students.
- -Misleading information regarding course delivery and lack of proper orientation.
- -Administrative and communication issues cause significant problems.
- -Unresponsive and unhelpful customer service frustrates students.
- -Poorly organized and user-unfriendly online platforms hinder access to information.
- -Administrative and management issues are a major concern.
- -Outdated facilities and technology are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of support and resources for students is frequently mentioned.
- -Administrative & management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently criticized.
- -Lack of effective communication and support is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is prevalent.
This institution demonstrates a strong overall performance, with location emerging as its standout feature, achieving a near-perfect score. Student life and internationality also received highly favorable ratings. Conversely, accommodation represents the area with the lowest score among the surveyed categories.
This university demonstrates significant strengths in its location and internationality, both scoring notably high. Student life and facilities also received positive marks. However, accommodation emerged as the weakest area, reflecting a potential point of concern. Professors and the overall value proposition are rated moderately well, indicating a generally solid but improvable performance in these aspects.
Overall, the university garners positive feedback, with **Facilities** emerging as its strongest asset at 4.1. **Professors** also receive a commendable score of 3.8. Areas rated lower include **Internationality** at 3.5 and **Accomodation** and **Value**, both at 3.6, representing opportunities for improvement. Student life and location also fall within a solid, though not outstanding, range.
A well-rounded university experience is indicated by these ratings. The strongest aspects are the **Location** (3.89) and **Internationality/Value** (both 3.79), suggesting a desirable and globally recognized institution with good perceived worth. **Student Life** (2.67) received the lowest score, pointing to an area that could be improved. Other areas like Professors, Facilities, and Accomodation fall in the mid-range.
This institution presents a well-rounded academic and student experience. Its strongest points are the excellent location and vibrant student life, both receiving perfect scores. While all other areas are rated highly at a 4 out of 5, there are no significant weaknesses to report. Facilities, professors, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value all contribute to a positive overall impression.
With high marks across the board, this university excels in faculty expertise, earning a near-perfect 4.67. Its location and accommodation are also well-regarded at 4.38. Student life, though strong at 4.22, represents the lowest-rated category in this assessment. Internationality and value for money are notably strong, both receiving 4.44.
This institution excels in several key areas, receiving perfect scores for its professors, location, student life, and internationality. Its value proposition is also very strong. However, accommodation presents the most significant weakness, rated considerably lower. Facilities also received a middling score.
With an average rating of 4.48/5 from 126 reviews, ~97.6% of feedback is positive. Students highly praise transformative programs, excellent teachers, and valuable career opportunities. A small percentage of negative reviews mention issues with administration and program delivery.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, praising practical learning, industry expert professors, and engaging classes. A small percentage of feedback (~8%) is negative, citing disorganization and basic education.
With an average rating of 4.11/5 from 54 reviews, ~85% are positive, highlighting complete degrees, practical projects with companies, and quality teaching. A very small amount (~2%) of feedback was negative.
~80% of reviews are positive, highlighting a robust virtual campus, flexible online model, and continuous assessment. A small percentage (~10%) of negative feedback mentions administrative errors and poor customer service.
With a 4/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, students highlight excellent equipment and creative space. They also appreciate professional classes and valuable administrative knowledge for culinary careers.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~100% of feedback recommending the program. Students highlight great teachers, practical course content, and a supportive, diverse community as key strengths. There are no negative reviews.
All reviews are positive, highlighting helpful professors, a humanistic and diverse approach, and a practical, affordable learning experience. The average rating is 4.67 out of 5.
From a purely academic perspective, the experience is great. The professors are super good and the small class sizes really make the learning experience very personalised. The program has been carefully curated to be relevant and is very practical - I feel like I am learning things I would actually use in my professional career. Apart from this, the students come from really different backgrounds and cultures and it really helps you learn more about how things are different in other countries. Overall, it's been a fantastic experience so far and I highly recommend it!
Although I earned my bachelor degree at the University of York in UK, it was quite theoretical. I really started to bridge the learning gap between theory and practice only when I started to pursue my master degree in Business Analytics and Data Science at EU Business School in Barcelona. What stands out most in my current program is the university’s strong emphasis on practical experience. Our professors are not only scholars but also are successful business managers and data experts, as they are either the owners of successful organizations or individuals who took on top management roles in large corporations. Their teachings are more than just the syllabus in, they also provide personal experience in the area of niche markets, provide best practices in an industry, and always provoke our thinking with regard to the existing trends in higher education, business strategy, and innovation.
Worst university ever, I’m an İNTERNATİONAL student who came just for one semester for ERASMUS from another institution. It was the worst experience ever in my life, Esic university treated me so badly. The ERASMUS coordinator is really disrespectful and he didn’t even do a welcoming day for the new students. We didn’t get any training on how we can adapt to the university's system. First, they told us it is a hybrid system, which is not the case. This is the first lie from a higher education institution. They are really trying to push me to fail administration and also teachers I really feel it’s a religious problem about where I come from , plus I did all of my exams perfectly. Now I’m surprised that one teacher wants me to fail because I didn’t do one exercise ( just one in all semester lol) , my exam was perfect now she doesn’t want to show me my results and told me that she will make me fail because of one exercise. It is not fair and no one from the administration wants to help me as an Erasmus student, but I feel there is a difference between me and Spanish nationalities. Now I will take my legal right. They really discriminated against me in every way I’m really sad how I got used and treated this badly and also this issue has now become a personal issue, I really don’t recommend any İNTERNATİONAL students to join ESIC Valencia it’s the worst university on planet earth 😡
I started the UOC because I was very interested in Law, however I was already doing a career in a university in person. This undoubtedly, and after two years in it, it is no longer a problem. The UOC gives you the possibility to manage your time to your liking, the material is good (although it could be better and keep updating), and the jobs do not require a giant effort (it depends a lot on the subject). I definitely recommend it if you want to learn at your own pace.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
