emlyon business school vs SKEMA Business School vs Chengdu University of Information and Technology - CUIT vs Chengdu University of Technology - CDUT vs ESSCA School of Management
Side-by-side comparison from 210 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, international focus and diverse student body.
- +Strong career support and professional experience opportunities.
- +Diverse program options and personal project development.
- +Strong academic programmes with practical application
- +Excellent opportunities for skill development and networking
- +Valuable international exposure and alumni support
- +Engaging and accessible teaching styles.
- +Supportive and helpful faculty and staff.
- +Vibrant student community and extracurriculars.
Nothing to show
- +Practical, real-world teaching and international exposure
- +Supportive staff and engaging learning environment
- +High-quality programs and diverse student body
- +Strong student welfare and support
- +Excellent academic programs and research facilities
- +Diverse and engaging campus activities
- +Experiential learning and entrepreneurship opportunities
- +Direct access to industry leaders (CXOs, CEOs)
- +Valuable networking and lifelong friendships
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues cause poor communication and disorganization.
- -Teaching faculty and their perceived focus on profit over education are criticized.
- -Guidance for career goals and clarity on doubts are lacking.
- -Teachers are boring and teaching methods are unengaging.
- -The curriculum often feels outdated.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
Nothing to show
- -Irrelevant course content and unqualified instructors.
- -High tuition fees for perceived poor value.
- -Lack of student motivation and academic focus.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Course content is often irrelevant or poorly delivered.
- -Administrative and management issues are a major frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are common complaints.
- -Poor communication and lack of transparency from the institution are frequently mentioned.
This institution demonstrates a generally positive standing, with its strongest areas being **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.6. **Student Life** and **Value** also received high marks, around 4.3 and 4.49 respectively. The **Facilities** and **Professors** are rated well, in the low 4s. **Accomodation** appears to be the relatively weakest area, with a score of 4.
This university demonstrates particularly strong performance in its **Professors** (4.41), **Internationality** (4.36), and **Location** (4.25). **Facilities** (4.21) and **Student Life** (4.11) also receive favorable scores. However, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating of 3.58, while **Value** sits at 4.04.
Across all surveyed categories, the university received a neutral rating of 0. This indicates that no single area stands out as particularly strong or weak in the current assessment. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value were all rated equally, suggesting an average or unremarkable performance in each domain.
Nothing to show
This institution shows excellent strengths in its **Location** and **Student Life**, both receiving high scores of 4.15. **Professors** also garnered a perfect 4. **Facilities**, with a score of 3.54, and **Value** at 3.77, are respectable. The **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, scoring 3.31. **Internationality** is also a strong point, rated at 3.92.
This university demonstrates a consistently strong performance across various aspects. Its facilities are rated exceptionally high, receiving a perfect score of 5. Among other well-regarded areas are accommodation and value, both exceeding 4.4. Location and internationality also scored favorably at 4.28. Student life is a solid 4.14. The weakest area, though still positive, is its professors, rated at 4.
Across a range of metrics, the university demonstrates exceptional strengths, particularly in its Professors, Student Life, Internationality, and overall Value, all receiving perfect scores. Location, Facilities, and Accommodations also stand out with high ratings. While no specific area received a low score, the consistency across the board suggests a well-rounded institution with particularly strong offerings in teaching quality and student experience.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~90% 4-5 stars) with an average rating of 4.53/5. Students praise the academic rigor, practical and international focus, and diverse student body.
Over 91% of reviews are positive, highlighting student associations, international opportunities, and practical skills for careers. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions issues with management, communication, and course organization.
The single review is negative (1-2 stars), giving an average rating of 2/5. This feedback, representing ~100% of reviews, highlights boring teachers and a lack of engaging instruction.
Nothing to show
Most reviews (around 70%) highlight practical teaching, an international environment, and good quality staff/students. A small percentage (about 7.7%) express dissatisfaction with course relevance and teacher quality.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~86%), highlighting student welfare, supportive staff and supervisors, and diverse activities. Facilities like labs and libraries are praised, as is the good international environment with no discrimination.
All three reviews are highly positive, averaging 5/5 stars. Students highlight real-world business experience, including product development and profit generation, and valuable learning from industry leaders. They also praise opportunities for international collaboration and lifelong friendships.
Nothing to show
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
ESSCA School of Management is known for its international approach and diverse programs. In my opinion, many students appreciate its emphasis on experiential learning and the opportunities for international exposure through exchange programs and internships. However, some may find the workload demanding and challenging but that's the way it operates. Whether I recommend it would depend on your specific academic and career goals, as well as your preferences for learning style and environment. Likes/ Dislikes: *Essca provides enormous opportunities to improve and enhance your skill. *Diversified culture *Provides webinars and seminars across all the campuses. *Workload Management could be seen as an disadvantage. As sometimes, you may find it very challenging.
Nothing to show
Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.
