emlyon business school vs SKEMA Business School vs Chengdu University of Information and Technology - CUIT vs Chengdu University of Technology - CDUT vs ESSCA School of Management

Side-by-side comparison from 240 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: TETR College of Business (4.80)
emlyon business school: wins 2/7 categories
SKEMA Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Chengdu University of Information and Technology - CUIT: wins 0/7 categories
Chengdu University of Technology - CDUT: wins 0/7 categories
ESSCA School of Management: wins 0/7 categories
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China - UESTC: wins 2/7 categories
TETR College of Business: wins 3/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
Best programme: Supply Chain Management
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
Best programme: Public Policy and Management
New York City, United States
4.80
Top
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Management & Technology
Category ratings
Facilities
4.15
4.22
Not rated
Not rated
3.80
5.00
Win
4.50
Location
4.60
Win
4.25
Not rated
Not rated
4.26
4.29
4.50
Professors
4.06
4.39
Not rated
Not rated
3.92
4.00
4.67
Win
Internationality
4.60
Win
4.39
Not rated
Not rated
3.92
4.29
4.33
Student life
4.25
4.13
Not rated
Not rated
4.17
4.14
5.00
Win
Value
4.43
4.05
Not rated
Not rated
3.76
4.43
4.67
Win
Accommodation
3.94
3.60
Not rated
Not rated
3.44
4.57
Win
4.50
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical and international programs with diverse students
  • +Valuable professional experience through internships and work-study
  • +Supportive environment for personal and professional development
  • +Practical, career-focused programs and in-demand skills acquisition
  • +Valuable international experiences and diverse student communities
  • +Supportive professors and excellent infrastructure
  • +Engaging and accessible teaching styles.
  • +Supportive and helpful faculty and staff.
  • +Vibrant student community and extracurriculars.

Nothing to show

  • +High-quality, practical education with specialized pathways.
  • +Supportive, close-knit learning environment and friendly atmosphere.
  • +Vibrant campus life with numerous enriching activities and social connections.
  • +Strong student welfare and support
  • +Excellent academic programs and research facilities
  • +Diverse and engaging campus activities
  • +Experiential learning and practical application of business concepts
  • +High-quality instruction and direct industry leader engagement
  • +International exposure and strong peer networking opportunities
Cons
  • -Lack of practical value and shallow content in courses.
  • -Unfair and frustrating grading, especially for group projects.
  • -Disappointing professor engagement and program support.
  • -Poor management and administrative issues.
  • -Ineffective communication and guidance.
  • -Concerns about teaching quality and faculty understanding of student needs.
  • -Teachers are boring and teaching methods are unengaging.
  • -The curriculum often feels outdated.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.

Nothing to show

  • -Poor quality and preparedness of professors
  • -Lack of relevance in courses and teaching
  • -Ineffective organization and management
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Course content is often irrelevant or poorly delivered.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor resources detract from learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in its internationality and location, both scoring above 4.5. Student life and value also received positive marks, exceeding 4.2 and 4.4 respectively. However, accommodation presents as the weakest area, with the lowest rating of approximately 3.94. Facilities and professors also received solid, though slightly lower, scores in comparison.

The university demonstrates notable strengths in its professors, internationality, and facilities, all receiving scores above 4.2. Student life and value for money also score positively. Accommodation stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating. Location also received a respectable score.

Across all surveyed categories, the university received a neutral rating of 0. This indicates that no single area stands out as particularly strong or weak in the current assessment. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value were all rated equally, suggesting an average or unremarkable performance in each domain.

Nothing to show

This institution excels in its **location**, receiving the highest rating. Student life and internationality are also well-regarded. However, **accommodation** presents the weakest area, with a lower score compared to other aspects. The university demonstrates a solid standing in facilities and professors, with value also scoring respectably.

This university demonstrates a consistently strong performance across various aspects. Its facilities are rated exceptionally high, receiving a perfect score of 5. Among other well-regarded areas are accommodation and value, both exceeding 4.4. Location and internationality also scored favorably at 4.28. Student life is a solid 4.14. The weakest area, though still positive, is its professors, rated at 4.

This institution garners exceptionally high marks, particularly excelling in Student Life with a perfect score. Facilities, Location, and Accomodation are also strong, all receiving 4.5 ratings. Professors and Value are rated highly at 4.67. The lowest score, though still solid, is for Internationality at 4.33.

Reviews summary
Highlights

The vast majority of university students have a positive experience, highlighting academic rigor, practical learning, and international environments. A small fraction of reviews mention disappointment with course content and grading.

Overwhelmingly positive feedback from 152 reviews highlights practical, career-focused courses, international opportunities, and strong academic/career support. Negative comments (~2.6%) mention poor communication, program disorganization, and concerns about management.

The single review is negative (1-2 stars), giving an average rating of 2/5. This feedback, representing ~100% of reviews, highlights boring teachers and a lack of engaging instruction.

Nothing to show

Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting good knowledge transfer, practical experience, and vibrant campus life. A small portion (~8%) of negative feedback mentions unprepared professors and irrelevant courses.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~86%), highlighting student welfare, supportive staff and supervisors, and diverse activities. Facilities like labs and libraries are praised, as is the good international environment with no discrimination.

With an average rating of 4.75/5 from four reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight hands-on learning, business idea development, and valuable connections with industry leaders and peers as significant benefits. Minimal negative feedback was present.

Rating distribution
5★
60%
50%
0%
0%
32%
29%
75%
4★
28%
42%
0%
0%
44%
57%
25%
3★
9%
7%
0%
0%
16%
14%
0%
2★
0%
1%
100%
0%
4%
0%
0%
1★
2%
1%
0%
0%
4%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Experience in School

My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Well-rounded programme

Overall, I had a positive experience at ESSCA. The programme is well organized and provides a solid foundation in business and management. The courses were generally of good quality and covered a broad range of topics, helping students develop both academic knowledge and practical skills. One of the aspects I appreciated most was the international exchange during the third year. ESSCA has a good network of partner universities, and the opportunity to study abroad was a valuable part of the programme. Student life is also a real strength of the school. The associative environment is active and offers many opportunities to get involved outside the classroom, meet new people, and gain additional experience. Like any programme, some courses were more engaging than others, but overall I found the experience enriching and would recommend it to students looking for a business school with a strong international dimension and a good balance between academics and extracurricular activities.

Nothing to show

Loving it here!

Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close