EU Business School vs Universitat CEU Abat Oliba - CEU UAO vs Universidad de Jaén vs Escuela de Arte José Nogué - EAJN vs Schiller International University

Side-by-side comparison from 340 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Advantere School of Management (4.70)
EU Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Universitat CEU Abat Oliba - CEU UAO: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad de Jaén: wins 0/7 categories
Escuela de Arte José Nogué - EAJN: wins 0/7 categories
Schiller International University: wins 1/7 categories
Universidad CEU Fernando III - CEU UF3: wins 3/7 categories
Advantere School of Management: wins 3/7 categories
Comparing
Barcelona, Spain
3.90
Read more reviews
251 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Telecommunications Engineering
Tampa, Florida, United States
4.40
Read more reviews
15 reviews
×
Best programme: BA International Relations and Diplomacy
Best programme: Information Systems Engineering
Best programme: Master’s in International Management (MIM)
Category ratings
Facilities
4.04
4.13
4.35
Not rated
3.93
5.00
Win
4.69
Location
4.73
4.13
4.06
Not rated
4.87
Win
3.00
4.79
Professors
4.04
4.13
4.18
Not rated
4.53
4.00
4.81
Win
Internationality
4.72
3.69
4.18
Not rated
4.87
5.00
Win
4.59
Student life
4.22
3.88
4.53
Not rated
4.14
5.00
Win
4.77
Value
3.87
4.00
4.29
Not rated
4.13
4.00
4.66
Win
Accommodation
3.54
4.27
3.76
Not rated
3.62
4.00
4.34
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Helpful professors and career support
  • +Valuable practical and theoretical business knowledge
  • +Enriching overall student experience
  • +Practical, industry-connected curriculum
  • +Expert lecturers with real-world experience
  • +Supportive professor-student relationships
  • +Holistic and interdisciplinary curriculum
  • +Supportive and helpful professors
  • +Vibrant student community and extracurriculars

Nothing to show

  • +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
  • +Opportunities for personal and professional growth
  • +Helpful staff and organized curriculum
  • +Teacher dedication and real-world focus
  • +Integrated and close learning environment
  • +Growing campus and accessible transportation
  • +Practical, project-based learning with real-world application
  • +Strong professional network and career preparation
  • +Supportive faculty and international environment
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause disorganization and lack of support.
  • -Outdated facilities and a focus on attendance over quality education are criticized.
  • -The educational program is perceived as basic and unaccredited in some regions.
  • -Incompetent and unprofessional leadership and management.
  • -Poor quality of instruction due to unqualified staff.
  • -Unclear teaching and disorganized university services.
  • -Excessive and unfair student failure rates.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant problems.
  • -Lack of extracurriculars and career support limits student experience.
  • -Teaching quality varies and some courses lack depth.
  • -Poor communication and lack of transparency from administration
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities
  • -Overcrowded classes and insufficient resources
  • -Poor communication and disorganization from administration.
  • -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources.
  • -Uninspiring teaching methods and irrelevant curriculum.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution excels in several key areas, with Location and Internationality receiving the highest marks at 4.73. Student Life also scores well at 4.22. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, scoring 3.42, suggesting room for improvement. Facilities and Professors are rated consistently around 4.04, while Value sits at a respectable 3.87.

Across various aspects, the university demonstrates strong performance, particularly in accommodation, which received the highest rating. Facilities, professors, and location also scored well, indicating solid foundational strengths. Student life and internationality received comparatively lower marks, suggesting areas where enhancements could be considered. Overall, the university presents a positive evaluation with a clear standout in its living arrangements.

This university shows particularly strong performance in **Student Life**, achieving the highest rating. **Facilities** and **Value** also received high marks, indicating areas of significant strength. The **Accomodation** received the lowest rating, suggesting it is an area that could be improved. Other categories like **Professors**, **Location**, and **Internationality** received solid, positive scores.

Nothing to show

This university is highly rated, particularly excelling in **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.87. **Professors** also receive strong marks at 4.53. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.62. **Facilities** are also on the lower end at 3.93, though **Student Life** and **Value** are rated positively around 4.1.

This institution garners excellent feedback, particularly excelling in **Facilities** and **Student Life**, both receiving perfect scores. **Internationality** also stands out with a top rating. Conversely, **Location** is the weakest point, scoring a moderate three. Other aspects like Professors, Accommodation, and Value are rated positively at a solid four.

Remarkable scores are evident across most surveyed aspects of this university. Professors and location stand out as exceptionally strong areas, both scoring near perfect marks. Student life and facilities also received very high praise. The weakest area appears to be accommodation, though it still maintains a respectable rating. Internationality and value for money are also well-regarded.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Around 74% of reviews are positive, praising professors, career services, and valuable skills gained. The remaining ~7.6% of feedback expresses concerns about disorganization and the quality of education.

With an average rating of 4.29/5 from 17 reviews, ~76% of feedback is positive, highlighting practical learning, professional lecturers, and personal professor relationships. A small amount of negative feedback (~6%) points to poor management and unprofessionalism.

With a 4.22/5 average from 23 reviews, ~96% of feedback is positive, highlighting helpful professors and enriching interdisciplinary curricula. A single negative review cited issues with teaching clarity and organization.

Nothing to show

The university is highly praised for its diverse student body, rich learning experiences, and opportunities for personal and career growth. However, about 13% of reviews mention inconsistent teaching quality and administrative issues.

With a single review, the university receives a 4/5 average rating. Approximately 100% of feedback is positive, highlighting good teacher-student relationships and real-world focused teaching.

Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~97% 4-5 stars), highlighting valuable technical knowledge, practical learning, and professional network development. No negative feedback was provided.

Rating distribution
5★
27%
65%
39%
0%
67%
0%
75%
4★
45%
12%
52%
0%
20%
100%
22%
3★
21%
18%
4%
100%
0%
0%
3%
2★
4%
0%
0%
0%
13%
0%
0%
1★
4%
6%
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Student-Staff relationship

As far as universities go I think EU business school comes first in terms of student-staff relationship. Every member of the staff I have encountered has been more than helpful. What i think should improve as even tho its not connected to my previous point is I think the school should have more leniency towards tuition payment specially to international students because we are here despite the challenges of having to find willing banks to exchange local currencies to Euros.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

The cultural mix and the great atmosphere.

I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.

Nothing to show

Masters international Management

I enjoyed this programe, academically is it similar to other programs in other cities but it offers so much more. The personal connection with professors, strong guidance for future career and the international network is what separates it from other options!

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close