London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs Middlesex University - MDX vs University of Derby - UoD vs Newcastle University vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris
Side-by-side comparison from 682 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Knowledgeable and approachable faculty
- +High-quality academic programs and clear feedback
- +Excellent facilities and resources
- +Supportive, passionate, and approachable staff.
- +Practical, relevant courses with real-world application.
- +Positive, friendly campus atmosphere and strong sense of community.
- +Dedicated lecturers & strong academic quality
- +Flexible learning & practical application of knowledge
- +Excellent support, communication & campus experience
- +Excellent academic programmes and dedicated professor support
- +Strong careers support and practical skill development
- +Vibrant student life with diverse societies and social opportunities
- +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
- +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
- +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network
Nothing to show
- +Flexible scheduling and ability to tailor projects
- +Comprehensive content and portfolio building
- +Personalized one-to-one tutor support and mentorship
- -Poor teaching quality and unstructured courses.
- -High fees combined with lack of support and career services.
- -Limited social life and judgmental environment.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and unengaging.
- -Poor teaching quality and inconsistent grading are major concerns.
- -Lack of in-person classes and reliance on outdated online materials are frustrating.
- -Frequent lecturer departures and missed classes disrupt the learning experience.
- -Lack of academic and personal support
- -Minimal resources and effort from support teams
- -Perception of being a "money grab"
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
- -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
Nothing to show
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
- -Excessive and confusing administrative processes cause frustration.
- -Lack of resources and limited support for students are frequently mentioned.
Examining the university's performance reveals a diverse set of scores. The strongest areas are **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving very high marks. **Student Life** stands out as the weakest performing category. Other areas like **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Facilities** received solid, above-average ratings, with **Value** also scoring positively.
This university demonstrates a strong performance across most surveyed aspects, with professors, internationality, location, and facilities all receiving high marks, averaging above 4.2. Student life and value also score well. The weakest area, however, is accommodation, which stands at a notably lower rating.
Offering a well-rounded experience, this institution excels in its **Facilities**, achieving a score of 4.28. Professors and location also receive high marks. While generally positive, **Student Life** and **Accomodation** represent the areas with the lowest scores, both hovering around the 4.0 mark, suggesting room for improvement in these aspects.
This university presents a strong showing, particularly excelling in **Location** with a rating of 4.75 and **Student Life** at 4.69. Facilities also received a very favorable score of 4.52. The weakest area appears to be **Value**, scoring 4.11, though most other categories, including Professors, Accommodation, and Internationality, also hover around the 4.2 to 4.3 mark, indicating a generally positive, albeit slightly less exceptional, performance.
This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.
Nothing to show
This institution garners universal praise, achieving perfect scores across all evaluated aspects. Its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are all rated a perfect 5 out of 5. This indicates exceptional strength in every area with no identified weaknesses, presenting a comprehensively outstanding university experience.
Approximately 96.6% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable professors, supportive learning environments, and strong academic reputations. A small percentage (around 3.4%) of negative feedback cites issues with lecturing, grading, and course structure.
With ~89% positive reviews and an average 4.25/5 rating, students highlight a friendly campus vibe, engaging events, and supportive, knowledgeable staff. Some mention practical, industry-relevant courses and good group project opportunities. No negative feedback was reported.
With ~97% of 35 reviews being positive, students praise incredible lecturers, top-notch facilities, and strong support. One negative review cited over-sold classes and inconsistent teaching.
With an average rating of 4.38/5 from 135 reviews, ~92% of feedback is positive. Students praise excellent societies, sports, career support, and academics, while a small amount (~0.7%) of negative feedback mentioned limited master's level support.
Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.
Nothing to show
All 12 reviews are positive, with students praising flexibility, one-to-one tutor support, and portfolio development. The average rating is 5/5.
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
most teachers are very patient when helping and explaining to student with questions, the time table planning is not great, responsible team is only accepting online request which the reply was always unable to make changes(except health related issues )
Derby is amazing, they are super organized and is great with communication. They ensure that all their students feel heard, safe, and involved in everything. I'm in my second year, and I have no complaints thus far.
The facilities of the school of computing are great - very modern building, newest equipment, campus located in the city centre (most likely you don’t need to commute there by metro or a bus). One major thing however that is lacking is the organisation. Being a third-year student I still have the same feeling - the program is written very chaotically. In 2019 there was that revolution of the programme (to keep learning the newest technology) to which lectures and demonstrators still feel a bit unadapted. I hope this will get better in the next year or two years. However, after that time, the taught technology may change again (which is good) and it will take another couple of years for the lecturers to be fluent in what they teaching (which is not good).
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
Nothing to show
Creative Design School (CDS) could not have been a more perfect fit for my plan to embark on a career change to graphic design. The key factors that lead to me enrolling on their Graphic Design Level 2 course was the flexibility of the course (allowing me to work full-time whilst studying), the reasonable course fee and a friendly, no-pressure Skype with the school to explain my situation and see if this would work for me. The course covers the key principles of graphic design and each module presents real-life scenario tasks that build up your portfolio while learning at the same time. I've surprised myself at how my skills have developed as I complete each module. The real bonus to studying with CDS is the amazing 1-to-1 tuition. My tutor, Pete, is always on hand to help, support and encourage me to push my creative boundaries. Having dedicated, personal tuition from someone with such knowledge of the industry is priceless. I would highly recommend this course and studying with CDS in general. I've enjoyed and gained so much from this course that I've already signed up to the Visual Communications course.
