EU Business School vs Universitat CEU Abat Oliba - CEU UAO vs Universitat de Girona vs Escuela Superior de Arte y Diseño de Olot vs C3S Business School in Barcelona - C3S
Side-by-side comparison from 389 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Helpful professors and career support
- +Valuable practical and theoretical business knowledge
- +Enriching overall student experience
- +Practical, industry-connected curriculum
- +Expert lecturers with real-world experience
- +Supportive professor-student relationships
- +Engaging campus environment and strong sense of community
- +High-quality academics and dedicated, supportive faculty
- +Excellent balance of academic rigor and vibrant social life
- +Supportive and personal teacher relationships
- +Balance of creativity and practical application
- +Supportive and approachable lecturers
- +Practical and well-structured courses
- +Welcoming and diverse international environment
- +Practical, creative, and engaging learning approach
- +Inspiring and supportive teachers with real-world business insights
- +Strong academic programs with global perspectives
- +Teacher dedication and real-world focus
- +Integrated and close learning environment
- +Growing campus and accessible transportation
- -Administrative and management issues cause disorganization and lack of support.
- -Outdated facilities and a focus on attendance over quality education are criticized.
- -The educational program is perceived as basic and unaccredited in some regions.
- -Incompetent and unprofessional leadership and management.
- -Poor quality of instruction due to unqualified staff.
- -Uncaring and unmotivated instructors are a recurring problem.
- -Repetitive campus life offers little variety.
- -Excessive administrative burden and unclear communication are frustrating.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities are a significant drawback.
- -The curriculum lacks relevance and practical application for future careers.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequent complaints.
- -Lack of support for internships and poor handling of student complaints are recurring problems.
- -Inconsistent staff behavior and a general lack of positive aspects make students unhappy.
- -Poor value for money regarding class hours.
- -Disappointing overall experience not meeting expectations.
- -Poor communication and lack of transparency from administration
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities
- -Overcrowded classes and insufficient resources
This institution excels in several key areas, with Location and Internationality receiving the highest marks at 4.73. Student Life also scores well at 4.22. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, scoring 3.42, suggesting room for improvement. Facilities and Professors are rated consistently around 4.04, while Value sits at a respectable 3.87.
Across various aspects, the university demonstrates strong performance, particularly in accommodation, which received the highest rating. Facilities, professors, and location also scored well, indicating solid foundational strengths. Student life and internationality received comparatively lower marks, suggesting areas where enhancements could be considered. Overall, the university presents a positive evaluation with a clear standout in its living arrangements.
This university demonstrates a strong showing in student-focused aspects, with Student Life receiving the highest marks at 4.29 and Location also performing well at 4.27. Professors are also highly rated at 4.22. Areas for improvement include Accomodation and Internationality, which are the lowest rated categories, at 3.88 and 3.87 respectively. Facilities and Value are rated solidly in the mid-range.
This institution received uniform zero ratings across all surveyed categories. Consequently, there are no standout strengths or weaknesses to highlight. The assessment indicates a consistent lack of positive attributes in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value. This uniform score suggests a critical need for improvement across the board.
Among surveyed metrics, the university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **professors** and **internationality**, both receiving high marks. **Student life** and **location** also score favorably. While **facilities** and **value** are solid, **accommodation** emerges as the weakest area, indicating room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience.
The institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its internationality, with a notable 4.79 rating. Professors also receive high marks at 4.74, and value for money is strong at 4.68. Areas for potential improvement include location and accommodation, both rated at 4.375, representing the lowest scores among the surveyed categories.
This institution garners excellent feedback, particularly excelling in **Facilities** and **Student Life**, both receiving perfect scores. **Internationality** also stands out with a top rating. Conversely, **Location** is the weakest point, scoring a moderate three. Other aspects like Professors, Accommodation, and Value are rated positively at a solid four.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, praising professors, career services, and valuable skills gained. The remaining ~7.6% of feedback expresses concerns about disorganization and the quality of education.
With an average rating of 4.29/5 from 17 reviews, ~76% of feedback is positive, highlighting practical learning, professional lecturers, and personal professor relationships. A small amount of negative feedback (~6%) points to poor management and unprofessionalism.
Nearly all reviews praise the beautiful campus and positive social atmosphere, with ~74% highlighting excellent teachers and academic/social balance. A single review noted some teachers lack engagement.
With one review, the university receives a perfect 5/5 rating. The sole reviewer highlighted exceptional teacher support and a balance of creativity and practicality in instruction. No negative feedback was received.
With a 4.57/5 average rating from 44 reviews, approximately 95% of feedback is positive, praising supportive, knowledgeable lecturers and practical courses in a multicultural environment. A small minority of ~5% reported issues with staff helpfulness and internship support.
Nearly all reviews are positive, highlighting engaging, creative learning with practical projects and inspiring teachers. A small percentage of feedback expressed dissatisfaction with the value of full-time programs.
With a single review, the university receives a 4/5 average rating. Approximately 100% of feedback is positive, highlighting good teacher-student relationships and real-world focused teaching.
As far as universities go I think EU business school comes first in terms of student-staff relationship. Every member of the staff I have encountered has been more than helpful. What i think should improve as even tho its not connected to my previous point is I think the school should have more leniency towards tuition payment specially to international students because we are here despite the challenges of having to find willing banks to exchange local currencies to Euros.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
C3S is a very good Institution for International Students. The lecturers here are so enthusiastic and truly passionate about their subjects; their knowledge and encouragement make me feel ready for my future career. At C3S, I really felt like I belonged; the diversity is incredible, and everyone is genuinely kind. Plus, the support systems are really strong. The courses are top-notch, and the learning experience really sets you up for great career opportunities.
The classes are so intresting I love how they they teach you about psychology and business strategy, I really like how the teachers are real professionals in terms of marketing , buisness... overall I really enjoy it.
Nothing to show
