Centro Federal de Educacao Tecnológica de Minas Gerais - CEFET-MG vs Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais - PUC Minas vs SKEMA Business School vs Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - UFMG vs Centro Universitário de Belo Horizonte - UniBH
Side-by-side comparison from 152 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong technical and engineering programs
- +Knowledgeable and approachable professors
- +Access to labs and hands-on learning resources
- +Excellent professors and comprehensive curriculum
- +Strong market preparation and multicultural insights
- +Good infrastructure and organized institution
- +International focus and diverse campus experiences
- +Practical, industry-relevant curriculum and career support
- +Strong community with great classmates and alumni network
- +High-quality teaching and knowledgeable, supportive professors
- +Strong preparation for the job market and career readiness
- +Excellent facilities and a welcoming academic environment
- +Supportive and knowledgeable professors
- +Modern and broad campus infrastructure with labs
- +Convenient location
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a constant problem.
- -Lack of resources and support hinder learning.
- -Overcrowded and outdated facilities.
- -Lack of communication from administration and disorganized management.
- -Limited course offerings and outdated curriculum.
- -Administrative and management issues create poor student experience.
- -Ineffective communication and guidance hinder career development.
- -Faculty and program organization are disappointing and overly focused on profit.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources detract from the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
- -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts learning.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution receives outstanding marks across multiple facets, with perfect scores awarded for its facilities, professors, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value. The location is also highly rated, though slightly below the exceptional standard set by other areas. Overall, the university demonstrates remarkable strength in almost every aspect.
This institution scores particularly well in its **facilities**, achieving an impressive 4.67. **Professors**, **location**, and **value** also stand out with strong marks of 4.5. The **student life** is rated positively at 4.4. Among the surveyed areas, **internationality** at 4.17 and **accommodation** at 4.2 received the lowest, though still respectable, scores.
Across a range of metrics, this institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its **professors** (4.41) and **internationality** (4.36). Facilities and location also received favorable scores, both above 4.2. Student life and value are rated around 4.0, indicating a generally positive experience. The weakest area is **accommodation**, which stands at 3.56, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect.
This institution receives its highest marks for Value, with an impressive score. Location also stands out as a significant strength. Areas requiring the most improvement are Accomodation and Internationality, which received the lowest ratings. Facilities and Professors are rated similarly well, while Student Life falls in the middle range.
Outstanding marks in location, internationality, and value highlight the university's appeal. Facilities, while solid, represent its lowest-scoring area. Professors, student life, and accommodation all received commendable ratings, indicating a well-rounded experience. Overall, this institution offers significant strengths, particularly for those prioritizing location and affordability.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The single review is highly positive, with a 5/5 rating. It highlights strong academics, particularly in technical fields, knowledgeable professors, and excellent laboratory access for hands-on learning. This positive sentiment represents 100% of the feedback.
With an average rating of 4.29/5, ~71% of feedback is positive, praising excellent professors, good infrastructure, and comprehensive programs. A small portion of feedback noted minor imperfections in technological features and graduation program structure.
The vast majority (~97%) of reviews are positive, praising international opportunities, practical curriculum, and strong alumni networks. A small percentage (~3%) express concerns about management, communication, and organization.
With an average rating of 4.56/5, nearly all (~100%) of the 9 reviews are positive, praising excellent teaching quality, dedicated professors, and strong preparation for the job market. A slight suggestion for more professional education was mentioned.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Recurring themes include modern infrastructure, convenient location, and well-trained, supportive professors. Some minor administrative slowness was noted.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
