Federal Polytechnic Ado Ekiti - FPA vs ISCTE Business School vs Taibah University vs Ekiti State University - EKSU vs Afe Babalola University - ABUAD
Side-by-side comparison from 137 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High-quality, practical education and relevant programs
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
- +Positive personal and professional development opportunities
- +Engaging teaching and valuable learning experiences
- +Strong professor-student relationships and helpful faculty
- +Vibrant student life and networking opportunities
- +Supportive and experienced professors
- +Valuable knowledge and experience sharing
- +Personalized guidance on graduation projects
- +Passionate lecturers teaching life skills and academic knowledge
- +Rigorous academic environment preparing students for future challenges
- +Supportive relationships between lecturers and students
- +Excellent lecturers and learning environment
- +Strong academic quality and personal development
- +Modern facilities and resources
- +Supportive professors and staff
- +Engaging campus life and activities
- +Strong academic programs and student preparation
- +Progressive academic curriculum in a secure and accommodating atmosphere
- +Expansive, career-focussed learning modules
- +State-of-the-art, internationally competitive facilities
- -Inconsistent and poor administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
- -Unengaging curriculum and lack of practical application.
- -Lack of student support, especially after tuition is paid.
- -Poor campus network connection.
- -Uncaring instructors focused on lectures over student needs.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are frequently cited issues.
- -Administrative and management problems, including poor communication, cause frustration.
- -The curriculum is perceived as outdated and not well-aligned with current industry needs.
- -Administrative inefficiency and poor response times cause frustration.
- -Negative interactions with administrative staff create a hostile environment.
- -Underutilized or ineffective facility usage hinders practical learning.
- -Authoritarian management and suppressed student rights.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
- -Unclear academic processes and poor communication.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are common complaints.
- -Administrative & management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support negatively impact student experience.
An excellent rating for value stands out, indicating strong perceived benefit for students. Conversely, accommodation received the lowest score, suggesting an area for improvement. Other aspects like professors and student life scored highly, while facilities, location, and internationality were rated moderately well. This profile presents a generally positive university experience with a key strength in value and a notable weakness in housing.
This institution achieves high marks, particularly excelling in its **Location (4.44)** and **Student Life (4.29)**. Internationality and value are also strong points at 4.08. The university's weakest area is **Accomodation**, receiving a rating of 3.54. Facilities and Professors also scored moderately well, around 3.8.
This institution garners exceptional ratings across all surveyed categories, achieving a perfect score of 5 out of 5 in every area. Its strengths are universally distributed, with no single aspect standing out as significantly stronger or weaker than the others. The university excels uniformly in its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value.
This institution demonstrates particular strengths in its **value** for money, achieving a rating of 4.03, closely followed by the quality of its **professors** at 4.0. Conversely, **facilities** represent the area with the lowest score, rating 3.40. **Student life** is also a positive aspect, earning 3.79. Other assessed areas like **location**, **accommodation**, and **internationality** fall in the mid-range.
Academic aspects and overall value receive high marks, with Facilities, Professors, and Value all scoring an impressive 4.17. Student Life and Accommodation are also well-regarded at 4.0. Internationality shows a strong score of 3.93. The university's weakest area, according to the ratings, is its Location, which received a score of 3.07.
This institution garners consistently strong evaluations, particularly excelling in Facilities and Student Life, both scoring an impressive 4.67. Professors and Accomodation also receive positive feedback at 4.33. Location and Internationality are rated solidly at 4.5. The sole area showing a slight dip in scoring is Value, which stands at 4.17, indicating a balanced overall profile with standout strengths.
The university garners perfect scores in every assessed category. Its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are all rated exceptionally. This indicates a uniformly excellent experience with no discernible weak areas based on this rating system.
With a 4.13 average rating from 15 reviews, ~87% of feedback is positive. Students praise strategic location, conducive learning environment, and quality education. A minor suggestion for laboratory equipment upgrades was noted.
Around 92% of reviews are positive, praising excellent professors, interesting subjects, and a supportive student life. A small percentage of negative feedback notes issues with teacher support on theses and campus network connectivity.
The sole review is positive, rating the university 4 out of 5 stars. This feedback highlights cooperative and experienced professors who support students, particularly with graduation projects. Negative feedback is approximately 0%.
~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting passionate teaching, goal setting, and impactful life lessons. Negative feedback (~8.3%) cites administrative issues and inefficient processes.
~96.5% of reviews are positive, highlighting competent lecturers, good learning environments, and modern facilities. A small percentage of negative feedback mentioned authoritarian founder and trampled rights.
All six reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students highlight strong professor-student relationships, engaging campus life with club opportunities, and excellent academic preparation. No negative feedback was reported.
With one review, the university receives a perfect 5/5 rating. The feedback highlights an exceptional academic curriculum, progressive impact on students, and a secure, serene learning atmosphere supported by state-of-the-art facilities.
My time at Federal Polytechnic ADO EKITI was a life changing experience that helped me develop into a well rounded person in addition to giving me the technical skills I required for my job. My professional and personal development are still influenced by the events and lessons i've learned.
Some teachers don’t care at all about the students, they just care about finishing their lecture program. The university as a very poor network connection through the entire campus. On the other hand, I enjoyed the program since you had one work assignment and one exam, only if you had under 7,5 you fail
Nothing to show
Ekiti State University offers solid academic programs and has dedicated lecturers who work hard to support students. The school provides opportunities for growth and learning, but like many public universities in Nigeria, it faces challenges such as strikes, limited facilities, and occasional delays in the academic calendar. The campus environment is lively, and students often create their own support networks to make the most of their time there. Overall, EKSU gives you the chance to earn a good education, but patience and adaptability are definitely needed.
I studied law and it was theoretical and practical. The lecturers were good and they tried to be hands-on with the students. The university always upgraded itself. It always looked for ways to be better for the students
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
