EU Business School vs RWTH Aachen University vs IU International University of Applied Sciences vs Kühne Logistics University - KLU vs Aachen University of Applied Sciences - FH Aachen

Side-by-side comparison from 497 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Kühne Logistics University - KLU (4.80)
EU Business School: wins 0/7 categories
RWTH Aachen University: wins 0/7 categories
IU International University of Applied Sciences: wins 0/7 categories
Kühne Logistics University - KLU: wins 5/7 categories
Aachen University of Applied Sciences - FH Aachen: wins 0/7 categories
Forward College: wins 2/7 categories
RWTH Aachen Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Barcelona, Spain
3.90
Read more reviews
251 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Electrical Engineering and Information Technology
Best programme: MBA
Best programme: Global Logistics and Supply Chain Management
Best programme: Economics
Paris, France
4.70
Read more reviews
32 reviews
×
Best programme: Data Science
Best programme: MSc Sustainability Management
Category ratings
Facilities
4.04
3.81
4.23
4.68
Win
4.40
4.45
3.83
Location
4.73
3.94
4.40
4.90
Win
4.40
4.83
3.67
Professors
4.04
3.58
4.43
4.66
4.20
4.91
Win
3.67
Internationality
4.72
4.03
4.44
4.80
Win
4.20
4.56
3.83
Student life
4.22
3.58
4.11
4.61
Win
4.00
4.58
3.67
Value
3.87
4.00
4.32
4.68
Win
4.40
4.56
3.67
Accommodation
3.54
3.09
3.68
3.78
4.00
4.29
Win
3.83
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Helpful professors and career support
  • +Valuable practical and theoretical business knowledge
  • +Enriching overall student experience
  • +Strong academic reputation and quality of teaching
  • +Practical application of knowledge and research opportunities
  • +Excellent support for international students
  • +Flexible online study for work-life balance
  • +Modern, intuitive digital platform for easy access
  • +Relevant, high-quality educational content
  • +International and diverse environment
  • +Supportive faculty and staff
  • +Practical learning and industry connections
  • +High academic standards and quality education
  • +Engaging projects and accessible professors
  • +Modern facilities and convenient resources
  • +International and diverse community
  • +Interactive and engaging learning approach
  • +Focus on personal growth and development
  • +Robust, technically-oriented curriculum
  • +Strong industry connections and networking
  • +Modern facilities and international exposure
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause disorganization and lack of support.
  • -Outdated facilities and a focus on attendance over quality education are criticized.
  • -The educational program is perceived as basic and unaccredited in some regions.
  • -Lack of respect and poor treatment from staff and faculty.
  • -Ineffective teaching, unclear explanations, and neglect of pedagogical skills.
  • -Administrative issues and difficulties with student support services.
  • -Slow and unresponsive administrative processes, including grade processing and student support.
  • -Poor staff attitude and lack of accountability for errors in student records and applications.
  • -Inadequate support and guidance for online students.
  • -Unclear or excessive course requirements and grading policies.
  • -Poor instructor communication and responsiveness, leading to confusion.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and lack of practical application in coursework.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a major drawback.
  • -Course content is perceived as irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
  • -Administrative and management issues are frequent sources of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently criticized.
  • -A lack of clarity or support regarding curriculum and academic expectations is a common complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues, including neglect and indifference, slow and inaccurate handling of student matters, and inaccessible alumni networks.
  • -The university prioritizes tuition fees over student welfare and opportunities.
  • -Concerns about unfair and potentially discriminatory contract practices.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution excels in several key areas, with Location and Internationality receiving the highest marks at 4.73. Student Life also scores well at 4.22. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, scoring 3.42, suggesting room for improvement. Facilities and Professors are rated consistently around 4.04, while Value sits at a respectable 3.87.

The university receives a commendable rating of 4.03 for Internationality, indicating a strong global presence. Location also scores highly at 3.94. Conversely, Accomodation presents the weakest area, with a rating of 3.07. Other aspects like Facilities (3.80), Student Life (3.60), and Value (3.99) fall within a solid mid-to-high range, while Professors average a respectable 3.57.

This institution garners notable praise in several key areas, with **Internationality** and **Professors** receiving particularly high scores. The **Value** proposition is also well-regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the lowest-rated aspect. Other aspects like Facilities, Location, and Student Life fall within a more moderate range of positive feedback.

This institution garners high marks for its **Location**, achieving a near-perfect score. **Facilities** and **Value** also stand out with impressive ratings. **Student Life** and **Professors** are well-regarded. **Internationality** is another strong point. The **Accomodation** rating is notably lower than other aspects, indicating a potential area for improvement. Overall, the university presents a robust profile with a few standout strengths.

The university excels in several key areas, with Facilities, Location, and Value all receiving strong scores of 4.4. Professors and Internationality are also well-regarded, both at 4.2. Accommodations are rated a solid 4. However, Student Life appears to be the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating of 2.7, indicating room for improvement in this aspect of the university experience.

Evaluations reveal a strong academic offering, with **Professors** receiving the highest marks at 4.91. **Location** also scores exceptionally well at 4.83. The university demonstrates good performance in **Student Life** (4.58) and **Internationality** (4.56), with **Value** also rated favorably at 4.56. **Facilities** are rated at 4.45, and **Accomodation** stands out as the area with the lowest score at 4.29.

This institution demonstrates a solid performance across its surveyed aspects. Its strongest ratings are observed in Facilities, Accommodation, and Internationality, all scoring an impressive 3.83. Conversely, Professors, Location, Student Life, and Value are slightly lower, averaging 3.67. This suggests the university excels in its physical resources and global appeal, while areas like academic instruction and campus experience represent opportunities for enhancement.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Around 74% of reviews are positive, praising professors, career services, and valuable skills gained. The remaining ~7.6% of feedback expresses concerns about disorganization and the quality of education.

Most reviews are positive (~74%), praising the program structure, research opportunities, and international student support. Some mention repetitive topics or a desire for more interactive lectures. A small portion (~14%) expresses concerns about hierarchy and teaching quality.

~95% of reviews are positive, praising flexibility, modern platforms, and accessible materials. A small percentage (~5%) mention issues with grading delays and slow administrative support.

Students highly praise KLU, rating it 4.8/5 based on 41 reviews. Key themes include its diverse and international environment, strong alumni network, and ample academic and professional development opportunities. No negative feedback was recorded.

With an average rating of 4.4/5, all five reviews are positive. Students highlight impressive academic standards, dedicated faculty, modern facilities, and engaging projects. Some note that while events are frequent, their organization and content could be improved.

With an average rating of 4.66/5 from 32 reviews, students praise Forward College's enriching international environment and innovative, interactive teaching methods. Personal and academic growth are frequently highlighted.

Approximately 83% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong curricula, industry connections, and modern facilities. A small portion of feedback (around 17%) expresses concerns regarding student support and administrative responsiveness.

Rating distribution
5★
27%
36%
63%
83%
40%
66%
0%
4★
45%
33%
27%
15%
60%
34%
83%
3★
21%
17%
6%
2%
0%
0%
0%
2★
4%
5%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
4%
10%
3%
0%
0%
0%
17%
Most useful review
Most liked
Student-Staff relationship

As far as universities go I think EU business school comes first in terms of student-staff relationship. Every member of the staff I have encountered has been more than helpful. What i think should improve as even tho its not connected to my previous point is I think the school should have more leniency towards tuition payment specially to international students because we are here despite the challenges of having to find willing banks to exchange local currencies to Euros.

High level education

I’m studying B.Sc. Electrical Engineering and Information Technology at RWTH Aachen. I’m currently in my 3rd semester. Although i find our subjects pretty hard to pass, i believe that this is the sign of quality education. I have troubles with some topics but our lecturers are always open to help and they also arrange online meetings to discuss our difficulties. What i also like is that you will have to choose a specific branch of your study after 2nd year, so that you’ll be more focused on your future area of expertise

The best university in the world

My experience with IU is very wonderful and exceptional. The learning process is smooth and easy especially for online students and the exams are well tailored to test your knowledge on what you have been learning. It is quite great indeed.

Second Chance

My experience at KLU has truly been life-changing. This university has given me a second chance and opened the door to a completely new life filled with opportunities. From the very beginning, it has felt like a second home. What makes KLU so special is the people. Every single person here is supportive and genuinely willing to help. The professors are not only highly qualified and professional, but also approachable and always ready to guide you in any academic or professional matter. I have never been in a place like this before. The strong connection with industry, the quality of events, and the incredible network of classmates and alumni create the perfect environment for both personal and professional growth. I will always be grateful to KLU for everything I have experienced here.

Nothing to show

Great modern university approach

I am currently a 3rd year student at Forward College and I have thoroughly enjoyed the experience and would recommend it to other students. The interactive approach of Forward where questions, debate, and discussion were encouraged enhanced my learning so much and I feel like I genuinely enjoyed every class. Having the experience of living in 3 different cultures, surrounded by people from all over the world made this experience even more special and helped me develop and grow in so many ways. Another aspect I have loved are the professors. Speaking with friends at other university I am so grateful to have teachers that actually know us, are excited to teach and interact with us, and will always take the time to help you.

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close