EU Business School vs IESE Business School vs Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich - LMU vs Technical University of Munich - TUM vs Munich Business School - MBS
Side-by-side comparison from 537 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Helpful professors and career support
- +Valuable practical and theoretical business knowledge
- +Enriching overall student experience
- +Inspiring cultural experiences and inclusive communities
- +Strong career advancement opportunities and alumni networks
- +High-quality academics and excellent faculty engagement
- +High-quality teaching and practical experience
- +Strong academic reputation and international environment
- +Well-organized programs with personalization options
- +Flexible and diverse program options
- +High academic standards and career prospects
- +Supportive professors and student community
- +Practical, real-world preparation and career readiness.
- +International perspective and global network development.
- +Supportive community, dedicated faculty, and networking opportunities.
- +Relevant and varied course content
- +Helpful and educated faculty
- +Supportive university staff
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause disorganization and lack of support.
- -Outdated facilities and a focus on attendance over quality education are criticized.
- -The educational program is perceived as basic and unaccredited in some regions.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources negatively impact the learning experience.
- -Lack of communication and support from the institution is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently mentioned.
- -Course content is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
- -Administrative and management issues hinder academic progress and student well-being.
- -Ineffective and unhelpful legal representation exacerbates problems.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of support and poor communication from staff are recurring problems.
- -Lack of organization and clear communication from administration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
- -Uninspiring teaching methods and irrelevant curriculum.
Nothing to show
This institution excels in several key areas, with Location and Internationality receiving the highest marks at 4.73. Student Life also scores well at 4.22. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, scoring 3.42, suggesting room for improvement. Facilities and Professors are rated consistently around 4.04, while Value sits at a respectable 3.87.
Overall, the university garners strong student satisfaction. Its most highly rated aspects include Internationality (4.74), Location (4.73), and Student Life (4.70). Professors (4.62) and Value (4.64) also receive excellent scores. The weakest area, though still positive, is Accomodation at 4.09, while Facilities are rated at 4.36.
This institution garners strong marks across the board. Its **facilities** stand out with the highest rating at 4.27. The **value** proposition is also highly regarded, scoring 4.25. Areas like **professors**, **location**, and **student life** are all rated around 4.19-4.20, indicating solid performance. **Accommodation** is the relatively weakest area, though still positive at 4.04. **Internationality** also scores well at 4.15.
This university garners excellent marks, particularly in **Internationality** (4.29) and **Facilities** (4.22). **Value** (4.20) and **Location** (4.19) also receive high scores. While **Student Life** (3.93) and **Accomodation** (3.75) are the lowest-rated aspects, they remain reasonably positive, suggesting a generally well-regarded institution.
This institution receives high marks across most aspects of the student experience. Location and Student Life are particularly strong, both exceeding a 4.2 rating. Internationality also scores very well. The primary area for improvement seems to be Accommodation, which has the lowest rating at just under 4.0. Other categories, including Facilities, Professors, and Value, are consistently rated above 4.1.
With a perfect score of 5, location stands out as the university's strongest asset. Student life, however, received the lowest rating at 3.33. Facilities and internationality scored a respectable 3.67, while professors and value were rated highly at 4. Accommodations were rated at 3.
Nothing to show
Around 74% of reviews are positive, praising professors, career services, and valuable skills gained. The remaining ~7.6% of feedback expresses concerns about disorganization and the quality of education.
With a ~100% positive rating, reviews highlight exceptional experiences, transformative professional growth, and excellent faculty. Students praise the welcoming culture, global diversity, and strong career connections. No negative feedback was recorded.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~98%), with an average rating of 4.08/5. Students praise the high quality of teaching, practical project opportunities, and enriching international environment. Negative feedback is negligible.
Nearly all reviews are positive, highlighting flexible academic systems, diverse specializations, and good career prospects (~98%). A small amount of negative feedback mentions scheduling conflicts and administrative issues.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~93%), highlighting well-structured programs, supportive environments, and strong career preparation. Students appreciate the international perspective, networking opportunities, and practical teaching approaches. No negative feedback was recorded.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%) with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise course content, helpful lecturers, and good accommodation. A few minor criticisms mention strict grading in one course and occasional unhelpful teachers.
Nothing to show
As far as universities go I think EU business school comes first in terms of student-staff relationship. Every member of the staff I have encountered has been more than helpful. What i think should improve as even tho its not connected to my previous point is I think the school should have more leniency towards tuition payment specially to international students because we are here despite the challenges of having to find willing banks to exchange local currencies to Euros.
Being at IESE was one of the best experiences of my life: 1- Professionally: this MBA is one of the best connected schools with top consultancy and banking sectors. for example, the 3 MBBs come to the school to train and interview candidates, ensuring a higher successful rate. It allowed me to jump from a civil engineering position to work for McKinsey. 2- Personal and cultural : amazing transformative 2 years, with people from all over the world (73 nationalities in my class) with great values. Totally worthy it.
There are superior facilities at the FH Aachen. The tutorial halls and classes are sophisticated, equipped with the the current and innovative equipment, and the library is large and well-stocked. To guarantee that students have a positive college experience, the educational facility also offers a range of extracurricular activities and events.
Nothing to show
I studied for 4 months in MBS (I did my Erasmus there) and I have nothing but good and kind words for this place. Their methodology is much different than what I was used to in Barcelona: all the classes were practical, with little or none theory explained and everything explained through real-case scenarios or simulations. The fact that the teachers were, most of the times, business men and women that where working part-time as teachers, allowed students to learn current hot topics that were trending on some kinds of industry. Some of the subjects have no exams and instead they have a final project (for example, International Business Project of HR Management) that has to be done in groups, allowing yourself to develop teambuilding and teamworking skills. Also, the fact that classes are quite small allow for a better teacher-student communication. Other than that, the Erasmus Programme of this university is quite recognized worldwide, making students not just from Europe, but from the world, to go to study in MBS. The variety of cultures and people that you meet allow for a more, better open-minded way of thinking. Something I would recommend: International Business Project class and HR Management. Also, German can be learned in different levels according to your skills. Something that I did not like that much: the wifi was quite slow and it was hard to connect to sometimes. Hope they have improved it!
Basically, it’s a private university with a good reputation and also the lecturers are well educated and helpful. The course contains 60% of management-related modules and the remaining technical modules. For anyone who is searching for a techno-management course, I would suggest Hochschule Fresenius.
Nothing to show
