Mines School of Nancy - ESMN vs Université de Lorraine vs École Nationale Supérieure d'Agronomie et des Industries Alimentaire - ENSAIA vs Schiller International University vs Forward College
Side-by-side comparison from 41 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Talented teachers and students
- +Good city for student life and focus
- +Strong school name and brand
- +Exceptional academic programs and quality education
- +Supportive and approachable faculty and researchers
- +Lively campus with good opportunities for personal and professional growth
- +Clear program specialization after common core
- +Focused agricultural and food industry engineering education
- +Culturally diverse environment and international campus access
- +Supportive and organized academic environment with helpful instructors
- +Opportunities for career advancement and independent learning
- +Engaging learning environment with interactive methods
- +Diverse and international student community
- +Unique multi-city European study experience
Nothing to show
- +Engaging professors and quality of classes
- +Positive university atmosphere and facilities
- +Excellent sports activities
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources detract from the learning experience.
- -Course content and teaching quality are often criticized as subpar.
- -Administrative and management issues caused significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources were frequently mentioned.
- -Poor communication and unclear expectations led to dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of transparency are prevalent concerns.
- -Lack of extracurriculars and limited opportunities for lower-year students.
- -Poor campus environment and a perceived low academic standard.
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a concern.
- -Lack of transparency and communication is prevalent.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor infrastructure are common complaints.
- -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts the learning experience.
A uniformly average rating across all categories indicates a consistent, though unremarkable, university experience. The institution scores a neutral 0 in Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value. No particular strengths or weaknesses are evident, suggesting a middle-of-the-road offering that meets basic expectations without excelling in any specific area.
This university garners exceptional ratings for its professors, who received a high score of 4.33. Location and student life also score well at 4. Conversely, the institution's weakest areas are internationality and value, both averaging 3.44. Facilities and accommodation present a middle ground with scores around 3.7.
With excellent ratings in accommodation and strong showings in professors and student life, this institution presents a positive picture. Its weakest areas appear to be in facilities and internationality, both receiving moderate scores. The overall value is well-regarded, suggesting a solid educational investment despite some room for improvement in physical resources and global engagement.
With a strong emphasis on location and internationality, this university also scores very well for its professors and student life. Value for money is also a positive aspect. The weakest areas, while still respectable, are its facilities and accommodation.
This university garners excellent reviews, particularly excelling in its **professors and location**, both achieving perfect scores. Student life and internationality also stand out with scores above 4.7. Areas with slightly lower, though still strong, ratings include **facilities and accommodation**. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded positive student experience with high marks across most aspects.
Nothing to show
Outstanding marks are awarded for facilities, location, student life, and accommodation, all receiving a perfect score. While internationality is a strong point at four, professors and overall value are areas that received moderate ratings.
With a 4/5 average rating, this university receives predominantly positive feedback. Students highlight talented teachers and a balanced city environment conducive to both studies and social life. No negative reviews were recorded.
All nine reviews are positive, giving an average rating of 4.11/5. Students praise the excellent research environment, high-quality education, and approachable, supportive faculty. The diversity of programs is also a recurring positive theme.
This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~100% of reviews being favorable. Students appreciate the clear specialization options in agronomy and agrifood, allowing informed career choices.
With a 4.54/5 average rating, nearly all students praise Schiller for its culturally rich environment and global opportunities. A small portion of feedback (~7.7%) suggests the university may be better suited for those seeking a less demanding academic path.
Students highly praise the interactive learning, international community, and opportunities for academic and personal growth. There are no negative reviews.
Nothing to show
With one review, the average rating is 4/5, reflecting overwhelmingly positive feedback (~100%). Recurring themes include a good atmosphere, quality facilities and sports activities. Some mention mixed feelings about classes, depending on professors.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
I am currently a 3rd year student at Forward College and I have thoroughly enjoyed the experience and would recommend it to other students. The interactive approach of Forward where questions, debate, and discussion were encouraged enhanced my learning so much and I feel like I genuinely enjoyed every class. Having the experience of living in 3 different cultures, surrounded by people from all over the world made this experience even more special and helped me develop and grow in so many ways. Another aspect I have loved are the professors. Speaking with friends at other university I am so grateful to have teachers that actually know us, are excited to teach and interact with us, and will always take the time to help you.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
