University of Warsaw - UW vs Warsaw University of Technology vs SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities vs University of Euroregional Economy - WSGE vs Lazarski University

Side-by-side comparison from 342 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Lazarski University (4.50)
University of Warsaw - UW: wins 1/7 categories
Warsaw University of Technology: wins 1/7 categories
SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities: wins 0/7 categories
University of Euroregional Economy - WSGE: wins 1/7 categories
Lazarski University: wins 4/7 categories
Zabielski Foundation: wins 0/7 categories
VIZJA University: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: International Relations
Best programme: Electrical Engineering
Best programme: Applied Psychology
Best programme: Business Administration in Management
Warsaw, Poland
4.50
Top
Read more reviews
112 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Management
Warsaw, Poland
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Warsaw, Poland
4.20
Read more reviews
43 reviews
×
Best programme: Psychology
Category ratings
Facilities
4.19
4.33
4.25
4.25
4.61
Win
Not rated
4.16
Location
4.37
4.73
Win
4.04
2.75
4.56
Not rated
4.33
Professors
4.45
4.36
4.32
4.50
4.57
Win
Not rated
4.19
Internationality
4.39
3.77
4.18
4.25
4.63
Win
Not rated
4.23
Student life
4.23
4.18
3.59
4.50
Win
4.46
Not rated
3.92
Value
4.46
4.36
4.04
4.25
4.62
Win
Not rated
3.93
Accommodation
4.22
Win
3.82
3.44
4.00
3.87
Not rated
3.60
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality, engaging academic programs with career preparation
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable professors fostering personal and academic growth
  • +Vibrant student life and attractive campus/location
  • +Excellent faculty and professors
  • +Recognized and high-quality programs
  • +Engaging and practical learning experience
  • +Passionate and knowledgeable lecturers
  • +Well-organized and relevant programs
  • +Positive learning environment and resources
  • +Affordable tuition and helpful staff
  • +Supportive professors and direct student contact
  • +Accessible location near Warsaw
  • +Excellent teachers and practical, real-world learning
  • +Engaging and supportive learning environment
  • +Modern facilities and international community

Nothing to show

  • +Strong academic programs and accreditations
  • +Commitment to student development and success
  • +Practical learning through internships and workshops
Cons
  • -Useless and irrelevant coursework and lack of accessible information.
  • -Underdeveloped course structure with insufficient classes.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -Communication and support from staff are often inadequate.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern.
  • -Poor organization and communication among staff lead to problems.
  • -Lack of adequate academic structure and support is evident.
  • -Administrative and management issues disrupt student experience.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of support and unclear communication cause frustration.
  • -Poor organization and unqualified instructors are a major concern.
  • -A lack of English proficiency among the student body hinders integration.
  • -Inadequate student support systems are a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and registration errors cause significant hassle and unexpected costs.
  • -Poor teaching quality and lack of engaging learning environments are prevalent.
  • -Inadequate student support, including limited facilities and poor communication, detracts from the experience.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution receives notably high marks across most aspects. Its strongest area is **Value**, closely followed by **Professors**, indicating excellent academic and financial returns. **Location** and **Internationality** also score very well. The weakest, though still respectable, category is **Facilities**. Overall, the university presents a strong offering with notable strengths in academic and financial aspects, with room for improvement primarily in its physical infrastructure.

With an overall strong showing, this institution excels particularly in **Location**, receiving its highest rating. **Professors** and **Value** also garnered impressive scores, indicating student satisfaction in these key areas. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Internationality** present the weakest points, scoring notably lower than other surveyed aspects. **Facilities** and **Student Life** fall within the upper-middle range of ratings.

This institution presents a strong academic profile, with exceptional ratings for its professors and facilities. Location and internationality also score well. Student life and accommodation represent areas with lower, though still respectable, scores compared to other aspects. The overall value for money is perceived positively, aligning with the location rating.

Overall, this university garners strong ratings, particularly excelling in its **Professors** and **Student Life**, both achieving a high score of 4.5. The **Facilities**, **Internationality**, and **Value** also stand out with solid marks of 4.25. While **Accomodation** receives a good rating of 4, the **Location** emerges as the weakest area, scoring significantly lower at 2.75.

An excellent performance is evident across several key areas for this university. Its strongest areas are Internationality (4.63), Facilities (4.61), and Value (4.62), indicating a highly positive student experience in these aspects. Professors and Location also receive very strong scores. The weakest area appears to be Accomodation, with a rating of 3.87, suggesting room for improvement in this particular category.

Nothing to show

An overall positive assessment emerges from these university ratings, with the institution excelling in **Location** (4.37) and **Internationality** (4.24). **Facilities** and **Professors** also receive high marks, both scoring approximately 4.17. The areas receiving the lowest scores are **Accomodation** (3.59), indicating room for improvement in this aspect, followed by **Student Life** and **Value**, both rated around 3.9.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nearly all ~99% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong academic programs, excellent professors, and a vibrant student life. A single negative review cited underdeveloped courses and difficulty accessing information.

With an average rating of 4.22/5 from 23 reviews, ~74% are highly positive. Students praise excellent lecturers and a recognized reputation, while no negative feedback was noted.

Nearly all reviews are positive, praising passionate lecturers and well-organized programs. A small percentage of feedback mentions concerns about program structure and course coordination.

With an average rating of 4.17/5 from 6 reviews, about 83% of feedback is highly positive. Students praise affordable tuition, helpful staff, direct lecturer support, and the university's positive environment. No negative feedback was provided.

With ~92% of 112 reviews being positive, students praise facilities, experienced teachers, and practical learning. A single negative review noted disorganization and an unsupportive student body.

Nothing to show

With a 4.19/5 rating from 42 reviews, approximately 86% highlight positive aspects like university development, program quality, and organized processes. A small ~5% of feedback points to issues with administrative errors and a perceived lack of student immersion.

Rating distribution
5★
45%
35%
44%
33%
64%
0%
42%
4★
44%
52%
49%
50%
27%
0%
44%
3★
10%
13%
3%
17%
8%
0%
9%
2★
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
5%
0%
1%
0%
5%
Most useful review
Most liked
Wonderful curriculum

Complex concepts are easier for students to understand when presented in a well-organized succession. The curriculum at the institution creates an ideal learning atmosphere by skillfully fusing theory and real-world application. Using a variety of teaching approaches guarantees student involvement and accommodates different learning preferences. Furthermore, the curriculum places a strong emphasis on connection to the actual world, giving students hands-on experience. All things considered, the programme has been carefully designed to make learning more seamless for students and improve their understanding and utilisation of the material.

Aerospace Engineering Bachelor's

Well defined and well-maintained classes with highly trained professors. They are very much timely and can happily assist you and your questions during consultation 1 to 1. You can learn a great deal of Aerospace Engineering tools and get inspired by student clubs flying rockets and gliders, and racing cars.

Practical and modern

Overall, i would rate programme at SWPS positively. What stands out the most is the practical approach to lerning. Many lectures have real professional expierience and often explain topics throhu examples from thier field, not only through theory or slides. The atmosphere is modern, open and quite relaxed, wich makes it easier to feel comfortable as a student. I also like that the university encourages independent thinking and discussion. However the organization could be better, especially considering the tuition fees. Some classes feel more useful and better prepared than others.

My vision

University is very good, coordination between students and professors is nice, work ethics is appreciable,subjects related to topic and clear whole concepts about subject and atmosphere of university is very nice.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Arts and Culture

The art studios are equipped with the necessary tools and materials for creative expression. The school auditorium hosts various cultural events and performances, providing a platform for students to showcase their talents.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close