Corporación de Educación Superior - ISES vs Zagazig university vs Howard University vs Swiss School of Management - SSM vs Pacific Institute of Management - PU pimt
Side-by-side comparison from 28 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Relevant programs leading to career success
- +Contribution to economic growth
- +Supportive and professional faculty
- +Engaging learning environment and community
- +Opportunities for personal and academic development
- +Strong academic support and real-world preparation
- +Welcoming environment and valuable lifelong connections
- +Diverse and enriching extracurricular and program opportunities
- +Practical, real-world preparation
- +Personal and professional growth
- +International experience
Nothing to show
- +Professional and flexible teaching staff
- +Accessible tuition fees and strong academic reputation
- +Ample international study program options
- +High quality education and focused, dedicated faculty
- +Supportive and engaging learning atmosphere
- +Promising infrastructure despite some limitations
- -Poor communication and administrative inefficiency.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and unengaging curriculum.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is prevalent.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Overcrowded classes and insufficient resources impact the student experience.
- -Frustrating administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Lack of engaging and relevant curriculum.
Nothing to show
- -Overcrowded classrooms and insufficient academic support are significant concerns.
- -There is a general dissatisfaction with outdated facilities and a lack of essential resources.
- -Students frequently cite administrative inefficiencies and poor communication as major frustrations.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are commonly disliked.
- -Teaching quality and course structure are often criticized.
This institution presents a uniform and notably low rating across all assessed aspects. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all received zero marks, indicating significant areas for improvement in every category. There are no standout strengths or discernible weaknesses as all areas are performing at the same low level.
This institution demonstrates particular strengths in its **Professors**, who received an impressive rating of 4.33. Conversely, **Student Life** emerges as the weakest area, scoring 2.83. Other aspects like Facilities and Accomodation were rated a moderate 3, while Location, Internationality, and Value fell within a similar range, generally around 3.3 to 3.7.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in its value proposition and internationality, scoring notably high in these areas. Student life and professors also received positive feedback. Conversely, facilities and location represent areas with the lowest ratings. Accommodation falls between these extremes, indicating a mixed but generally moderate reception.
This institution boasts exceptional scores in several key areas, notably achieving perfect marks for **Location**, **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Value**. The **Facilities** also stand out with a strong rating of 4.67. Areas showing slightly less consistent strength, though still positive, include **Professors** and **Student Life**, both rated at 4.33.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its faculty expertise and international student community, both receiving high marks. Conversely, its facilities, location, and accommodation are areas where it scores moderately. Student life and overall value are also positive aspects, suggesting a well-rounded, though not perfect, university experience.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in **Student Life**, achieving a perfect score, and also excels in **Internationality** and **Value**, both rated at 4.5. Areas of solid performance include **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Location**, all scoring 4.25. The lowest-rated aspect is **Accomodation**, with a score of 3.5, indicating room for improvement in this category.
With one review, this institution has a perfect 5/5 average rating. The single review is highly positive, recommending the institution for its academic programs and their contribution to economic growth.
Most feedback is positive, highlighting supportive faculty, a good campus, and educational opportunities. There are very few negative reviews, with a slight concern about classroom equipment.
With an average rating of 4.36/5 from 11 reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students praise academic support, personal growth, and strong community. No negative reviews were submitted.
All three reviews are overwhelmingly positive, awarding a perfect 5/5 rating. Students highlight the university's encouragement of creativity and practical, real-world business preparation. The international experience and the balance between theory and practice are also frequently praised.
Nothing to show
Two reviews average a 4/5 rating, with ~100% positive feedback. Recurring themes include excellent, professional teachers and a feasible fee structure. Some noted a need to update new facilities and student hostels.
All four reviews are positive, averaging 4.5/5 stars. Students praise the high standard of education, quality training, and dedicated faculty. Minor infrastructure concerns, like a shortage of lecture halls, were noted.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show