University of Science and Technology Houari Boumediene - USTHB vs Elon University vs National School of Civil Aviation - ENAC vs University of Kerala vs Lincoln University

Side-by-side comparison from 30 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
University of Science and Technology Houari Boumediene - USTHB: wins 0/2 categories
Elon University: wins 1/2 categories
National School of Civil Aviation - ENAC: wins 0/2 categories
University of Kerala: wins 0/2 categories
Lincoln University: wins 0/2 categories
The Ho Chi Minh City University of Social Sciences and Humanities: wins 1/2 categories
Ernest Cook University - ECU: wins 0/2 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Computer Science
Elon, North Carolina, United States
4.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Best programme: Aeronautics Engineering and Operations
Best programme: BA (hons) English
Lincoln, New Zealand
4.50
Read more reviews
15 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Germanic Languages
Best programme: Bioengineering
Category ratings
Facilities
3.60
4.00
5.00
5.00
4.53
4.67
3.00
Location
4.60
4.50
4.00
4.00
3.56
5.00
Win
4.00
Professors
3.40
5.00
4.00
5.00
4.53
4.67
4.00
Internationality
3.60
4.00
5.00
4.33
4.40
4.33
5.00
Student life
3.80
5.00
5.00
5.00
4.27
4.67
4.00
Value
4.00
5.00
4.00
4.67
4.47
4.67
5.00
Accommodation
3.40
4.50
Win
4.00
4.00
4.36
4.33
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Highly knowledgeable and passionate professors
  • +Large campus with modern facilities and diverse programs
  • +Friendly, collaborative, and supportive student community
  • +Strong sense of community and support
  • +Quality academic programs and resources
  • +Positive social and campus environment
  • +Expert instructors and industry professionals
  • +Wide range of aviation-focused programs
  • +State-of-the-art facilities and equipment
  • +Holistic development beyond academics
  • +Experienced faculty and practical training
  • +Strong reputation and promising future success
  • +Engaging professors and interactive teaching methods
  • +Strong focus on practical skills and real-world application
  • +Inclusive and participatory learning environment
  • +Inspiring professors and strong academic foundation
  • +Wide range of well-structured study programmes
  • +Dynamic and multilingual learning environment
  • +Specialized, career-oriented programs
  • +Hands-on practical learning opportunities
  • +Innovation and digital learning integration
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Course content is perceived as irrelevant or not up-to-date.
  • -Students dislike administrative inefficiencies and poor management.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a common complaint.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support are prevalent concerns.
  • -Poor communication and lack of transparency from administration are frustrating.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
  • -Course content is often irrelevant and poorly delivered.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of engagement and outdated curriculum are disappointing.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
  • -Facilities and resources are often described as outdated or lacking.
  • -A lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring theme.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and delays.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning and comfort.
  • -Lack of effective communication and support from instructors is a concern.
Rating summary
What students say

The university shines in its **location**, receiving an outstanding 4.6. Its **value** is also a significant strength, scoring a perfect 4. Conversely, the **professors** and **accommodation** are areas for improvement, both rated at 3.4. Other aspects like facilities and student life fall within a moderate range.

Exceptional strengths are evident in the university's professors and student life, both receiving perfect scores. Value for money also stands out with a top rating. The weakest area, though still strong, is the facilities at 4 out of 5. Location, accommodation, and internationality are all rated highly at 4.5, indicating a well-rounded and appealing educational environment.

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its **Facilities** and **Student Life**, both earning perfect scores. **Internationality** also stands out with a 5-star rating. Conversely, while still strong, **Professors**, **Location**, **Accomodation**, and **Value** received slightly lower, yet positive, scores of 4.

This institution demonstrates outstanding strengths, earning perfect scores for its facilities, professors, and student life. The value for money and internationality are also highly rated, with scores of 4.67 and 4.33 respectively. Location and accommodation are the areas with the lowest, though still positive, ratings at 4.

This university garners strong marks in most areas, particularly excelling in **Facilities** and **Professors**, both rated at an impressive 4.53. **Student Life**, **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Value** also receive commendations, all scoring above 4.2. The standout weakest area is **Location**, with a rating of 3.56. Overall, the institution demonstrates a high level of satisfaction among students in academic and campus life aspects.

This university garners impressive marks across multiple aspects. Its location stands out with a perfect score, while facilities, professors, student life, and value all received consistently high ratings. Accommodations and internationality, though still strong, represent areas with slightly lower, yet still favorable, scores compared to the peak performance indicators.

This institution boasts exceptional strengths in Internationality and Value, both receiving perfect scores. Its professors, location, and student life are also highly regarded, each earning a solid 4 out of 5. The university's weakest areas are Facilities and Accommodation, which both scored a moderate 3. Overall, the ratings suggest a well-rounded university with particularly strong global appeal and perceived value.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a high proportion of positive feedback, reviewers describe an enriching and collaborative academic environment. Students appreciate knowledgeable professors, modern facilities, and diverse program options, though some noted unhelpful teachers.

With an average rating of 4/5, reviews highlight strong community support and positive learning experiences. Students praise enjoyable events and qualified professors. A desire for increased diversity and cultural representation among staff was noted.

With a single review, the university has a perfect 5/5 average rating. This feedback highlights interesting courses taught by industry professionals and a wide variety of programs within civil aviation.

Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%), with students highlighting the university's focus on both technical skills and personal development, experienced faculty, and practical training.

All 15 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.53/5. Students praise engaging classes, passionate professors, and effective teaching methods. There is no negative feedback.

With an average rating of 5/5 from 3 reviews, sentiment is entirely positive (~100%). Recurring positive themes include knowledgeable lecturers, good curriculum structure, and a dynamic learning environment. There are no negative reviews.

With one review, the average rating is a perfect 5/5. This feedback highlights hands-on training, career-oriented programs, and innovation as key strengths. No negative feedback was provided.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
0%
100%
67%
53%
100%
100%
4★
80%
100%
0%
33%
47%
0%
0%
3★
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close