EADA Business School vs EU Business School vs ESADE Business School vs Universidad Europea - UE vs Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia - UCAM
Side-by-side comparison from 635 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High academic quality and practical application
- +Enriching international and multi-cultural environment
- +Supportive and welcoming community and staff
- +Helpful professors and career support
- +Valuable practical and theoretical business knowledge
- +Enriching overall student experience
- +Diverse and international community fostering personal growth and networking.
- +Excellent professors and practical learning with real-world application opportunities.
- +Supportive environment with intense, up-to-date academics and strong career placements.
- +Modern teaching methods and well-equipped facilities
- +Strong focus on practical learning and career opportunities
- +Supportive faculty and enriching academic environment
- +Supportive and attentive faculty
- +High-quality, well-organized programs
- +Diverse and international community
- +Welcoming and accessible environment
- +Attentive and close teaching staff
- +Good facilities and resources
- +Supportive and approachable lecturers
- +Practical and well-structured courses
- +Welcoming and diverse international environment
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and ineffective processes.
- -Lack of promised program focus.
- -Administrative and management issues cause disorganization and lack of support.
- -Outdated facilities and a focus on attendance over quality education are criticized.
- -The educational program is perceived as basic and unaccredited in some regions.
- -Administrative and financial issues, including poor handling of refunds and lack of server capacity.
- -Lack of focus on intellectual development and critical thinking.
- -Negative peer environment and perceived bullying.
- -Unresponsive and unhelpful staff.
- -Lack of teacher engagement and support.
- -Financial policies and material costs.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are recurring problems.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and curriculum concerns are frequently mentioned.
- -Outdated and insufficient facilities for sports and general use.
- -Poor teaching quality due to language barriers and ineffective delivery.
- -Lack of basic amenities like heating and inadequate organizational structure.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequent complaints.
- -Lack of support for internships and poor handling of student complaints are recurring problems.
- -Inconsistent staff behavior and a general lack of positive aspects make students unhappy.
This institution garners notable acclaim, particularly for its exceptional location, which received the highest rating. Internationality and student life also stand out as strong points. Conversely, accommodation emerged as the area with the lowest score, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect compared to other assessed categories. Overall, the university demonstrates a generally positive standing across various university life elements.
This institution excels in several key areas, with Location and Internationality receiving the highest marks at 4.73. Student Life also scores well at 4.22. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, scoring 3.42, suggesting room for improvement. Facilities and Professors are rated consistently around 4.04, while Value sits at a respectable 3.87.
This institution demonstrates robust performance across various metrics. Its strongest area is **Professors**, with an impressive rating of 4.38. **Value** also scores highly at 4.26, closely followed by **Student Life** at 4.12 and **Internationality** at 4.09. The weakest areas are **Facilities** at 3.97 and **Accomodation** at 3.83, though these still represent solid scores.
This university garners high marks for its internationality, achieving a rating of 4.49. Professors are also well-regarded at 4.21, closely followed by facilities at 4.23 and student life at 4.04. Conversely, accommodation and value received lower scores, at 3.79 and 3.72 respectively, while location sits at 3.98.
Reviewing the university's performance reveals a mixed but generally positive picture. The strongest area for the institution is clearly its professors, who received an excellent rating. Students also appear to be well-served by the location and student life. Areas with slightly lower, though still respectable, scores include facilities, accommodation, internationality, and value for money.
This institution demonstrates a solid average across several aspects, with its strongest area being **Professors**, earning a respectable 3.75. Areas such as Facilities, Accomodation, and Internationality represent the weakest points, all receiving a rating of 3. Location, Student Life, and Value fall within a middle tier, indicating moderate satisfaction.
Among surveyed metrics, the university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **professors** and **internationality**, both receiving high marks. **Student life** and **location** also score favorably. While **facilities** and **value** are solid, **accommodation** emerges as the weakest area, indicating room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience.
Approximately 92% of reviews are positive, highlighting academic quality, expert professors, and enriching multicultural environments. A small percentage of feedback (~2%) mentioned issues with course communication and administrative inflexibility.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, praising professors, career services, and valuable skills gained. The remaining ~7.6% of feedback expresses concerns about disorganization and the quality of education.
With ~92% of reviews being positive, students highlight valuable international environments, diverse communities, and practical learning. Some negative feedback, representing ~8%, mentions concerns about program value and specific logistical issues.
Most reviews are positive (~96%), highlighting modern teaching methods, practical learning, and job opportunities. A small minority of feedback (~4%) mentions indifferent teachers and material costs.
With a 4.18 average rating from 11 reviews, students praise UCAM's high-level teaching, supportive faculty, and enriching academic and international environments. No negative feedback was provided.
About 75% of reviews are positive, highlighting a welcoming atmosphere, good services, and attentive staff. Around 25% of feedback mentioned poor facilities and organization issues. The average rating is 3.5/5.
With a 4.57/5 average rating from 44 reviews, approximately 95% of feedback is positive, praising supportive, knowledgeable lecturers and practical courses in a multicultural environment. A small minority of ~5% reported issues with staff helpfulness and internship support.
In my experience, this business school is considerably more hyped than the actual value it delivers. While the marketing and reputation may create high expectations, the learning experience often falls short. One of the biggest concerns is the lack of placement support. Students are largely expected to manage their career opportunities on their own, which can be disappointing given the investment made in the program. Academically, many subjects are covered only at a surface level. The curriculum tends to focus on providing a broad overview rather than developing deep understanding or practical expertise. Most topics are wrapped up in just one or two classes, which is rarely enough to gain meaningful knowledge or build strong skills. As a result, students are often left to do significant self-learning if they want to truly understand the material. While the school introduces a wide range of business concepts, it doesn't always provide the depth, rigour, or hands-on learning that many students expect from a quality business education. Overall, I found the institution to be somewhat overrated, with the reputation and hype exceeding the actual learning outcomes and career support provided.
As far as universities go I think EU business school comes first in terms of student-staff relationship. Every member of the staff I have encountered has been more than helpful. What i think should improve as even tho its not connected to my previous point is I think the school should have more leniency towards tuition payment specially to international students because we are here despite the challenges of having to find willing banks to exchange local currencies to Euros.
Esade has been a great start for my career. You have the opportunity to learn a lot from classes, but also from the people (professors and other students). They really help you to do your first steps in the world, referrings to your career
Excellent university, with experienced professors, professionals in the areas they teach and with an incomparable teacher-student proximity.It is a very good university for International students since thet offer Portuguese classes and some subjects are in English. In terms of infrastructure, despite being small and not having all the conditions and equipment, it brings together a pleasant environment for studying - in addition to very good cleaning conditions and modern rooms. At the administrative level, it is organized. As for the students, many are very interested in being there, excellent students and enormous dedication.
The life in Murcia is simply great! A lot of tapas bars, bars, clubs etc. which are affordable for students! During the courses at UCAM, I got to know so many international people who got really good friends in the meanwhile. The only shortcoming is that several professors have difficulties to explain their ideas in English, because of the language barrier. But this does not concern every teacher. Furthermore, the teaching staff is not only about professors but about people having their own business and talking about their own experiences. All in all the education is pretty good at UCAM. But the working-life balance is even better. "Savoir-Vivre!"
My experience as an Erasmus student was not that good. Starting from the teachers, they are supposed to teach in English but they just don't know the language very well, that is why the performance is poor as well as what arrives to the student in terms of study content. To follow with the complete lack of heating system in all the buildings except for the library (where the people who don't use laptops like to occupy the only few spots with sockets). The organization is very poor, it will very often happen that a communication of a canceled class will not be done, having you waking up early in the morning to find out there was not class that day, not to count that 1 hour and half spent on the bus to go and come back from the university (if you live in La Merced and don't have a bike, which would easily get stolen after 2 days after the purchase).
C3S is a very good Institution for International Students. The lecturers here are so enthusiastic and truly passionate about their subjects; their knowledge and encouragement make me feel ready for my future career. At C3S, I really felt like I belonged; the diversity is incredible, and everyone is genuinely kind. Plus, the support systems are really strong. The courses are top-notch, and the learning experience really sets you up for great career opportunities.
