emlyon business school vs SKEMA Business School vs NEOMA Business School vs Audencia Business School vs ONCAMPUS Global

Side-by-side comparison from 319 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: ONCAMPUS Global (4.80)
emlyon business school: wins 0/7 categories
SKEMA Business School: wins 0/7 categories
NEOMA Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Audencia Business School: wins 0/7 categories
ONCAMPUS Global: wins 3/7 categories
Schiller International University: wins 2/7 categories
Ecole des Ponts Business School: wins 2/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
Best programme: Master in Management
London, The United Kingdom
4.80
Top
Read more reviews
21 reviews
×
Best programme: Undergraduate Foundation Programme
Tampa, Florida, United States
4.60
Read more reviews
14 reviews
×
Best programme: BA International Relations and Diplomacy
Best programme: AI in Project Management
Category ratings
Facilities
4.15
4.23
3.86
4.00
4.44
3.92
4.50
Win
Location
4.60
4.33
3.91
4.06
4.75
4.93
Win
4.60
Professors
4.06
4.38
3.97
4.10
4.76
4.64
4.83
Win
Internationality
4.60
4.42
4.22
4.40
4.62
4.93
Win
4.67
Student life
4.25
4.25
4.21
4.00
4.58
Win
4.15
4.50
Value
4.43
4.09
4.19
4.10
4.52
Win
4.29
4.17
Accommodation
3.94
3.68
3.91
3.58
4.35
Win
3.62
3.33
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical and international programs with diverse students
  • +Valuable professional experience through internships and work-study
  • +Supportive environment for personal and professional development
  • +Diverse international campus options and multicultural exposure
  • +Comprehensive and customizable curricula for academic and professional growth
  • +Strong faculty expertise and ample career development opportunities
  • +Flexible, international curriculum shaping studies.
  • +Strong networking and community through associations and alumni.
  • +Engaging and professional teaching with diverse student body.
  • +Excellent teachers and diverse international community
  • +Great facilities and well-structured classes
  • +Supportive learning environment and city amenities
  • +Supportive and approachable teachers
  • +Excellent student support services
  • +Convenient campus location and facilities
  • +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
  • +Opportunities for personal and professional growth
  • +Supportive and well-organized academic environment
  • +Transformative personal and professional growth
  • +Practical, market-relevant skills for career advancement
  • +High-quality, competent faculty and engaging courses
Cons
  • -Lack of practical value and shallow content in courses.
  • -Unfair and frustrating grading, especially for group projects.
  • -Disappointing professor engagement and program support.
  • -Administrative and management issues negatively impact student experience and support.
  • -Poor communication and guidance from faculty hinder career aspirations.
  • -Program disorganization and overwhelming course load create confusion and stress.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of effective communication and support is prevalent.
  • -Limited practical training and theory-heavy courses.
  • -Unresponsive professors and resistance to feedback.
  • -Lack of student interaction and networking opportunities.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and lack of clear communication are frustrating.
  • -Limited resources and support for academic needs are a concern.
  • -Lack of extracurricular activities and limited internship/job opportunities.
  • -Poor campus environment and student engagement.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of resources and support for students is a major concern.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in its internationality and location, both scoring above 4.5. Student life and value also received positive marks, exceeding 4.2 and 4.4 respectively. However, accommodation presents as the weakest area, with the lowest rating of approximately 3.94. Facilities and professors also received solid, though slightly lower, scores in comparison.

Emerging from the data, this institution shines particularly bright in **Internationality**, scoring an impressive 4.42. Professors and Location also receive very high marks, both above 4.3. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.68, indicating potential for improvement in this aspect of student experience. Other categories, including Facilities, Student Life, and Value, are all rated positively.

Examining the provided university ratings reveals a strong showing in several key areas. Internationality stands out as the highest-rated category, closely followed by Student Life and Value, indicating significant strengths in these aspects. Facilities represent the lowest-scoring area, suggesting room for improvement compared to other metrics. The remaining categories, Professors, Location, and Accomodation, fall within a relatively narrow and positive range.

This university garners strong marks for its **Internationality**, receiving a high rating of 4.385. Professors and Value also score well at 4.125. Areas like Facilities and Student Life are generally positive, hovering around 4.0. The weakest area is **Accomodation**, with a rating of 3.579, indicating it could benefit from improvement compared to other aspects of the university experience.

This institution garners strong approval across multiple aspects, with particularly high marks for its **Professors (4.76)** and **Location (4.75)**. Student life and internationality also score well, above 4.5. **Accommodations (4.35)** received the lowest rating, though still generally positive, while facilities and value demonstrate solid, above-average performance.

This university garners its highest marks for **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving a near-perfect score. **Professors** are also highly rated, reflecting strong academic quality. The university's **Value** and **Student Life** also score well. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerges as the weakest area, followed by **Facilities**, indicating room for improvement in these aspects of the student experience.

Overall, this university receives commendations across most aspects, with particularly high marks for its professors (4.83) and internationality (4.67). Facilities and student life also score well. The weakest area identified is accommodation, with a rating of 3.33. Value for money is rated at a solid 4.17.

Reviews summary
Highlights

The vast majority of university students have a positive experience, highlighting academic rigor, practical learning, and international environments. A small fraction of reviews mention disappointment with course content and grading.

The university garners overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~90.5% of reviews being favorable. Students praise the international opportunities, comprehensive curriculum, and professional development. A small fraction (~2.4%) of negative reviews cite issues with management and communication.

With ~74% of reviews being positive, students praise the program's flexibility, international focus, and professionalizing opportunities. Some mention assignments being difficult to balance with revision. No negative reviews were recorded.

Nearly all (95%) of 20 university reviews are positive, praising the learning environment, great facilities, and good teachers. A single negative review cited disappointment with practical tool training and professor engagement.

All 21 reviews are positive, averaging 4.76/5 stars. Students frequently praised helpful teachers, strong academic support, and good facilities. Some also highlighted a positive transition experience and newfound confidence.

With an average rating of 4.57/5 from 14 reviews, ~93% are positive, praising diverse classes, educators, and global peer networks. A single negative review (~7%) found it suitable only for those seeking an easy degree with limited extracurriculars.

All 6 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students highlight challenging and transformative experiences, career advancements, and high-quality courses and professors.

Rating distribution
5★
60%
50%
28%
30%
76%
71%
50%
4★
28%
41%
44%
65%
24%
21%
50%
3★
9%
7%
28%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
1%
0%
5%
0%
7%
0%
1★
2%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Class of 2018, Int'l Business Administration

Studying at Skema Business School in Sophia Antipolis was a fantastic experience. The campus is modern and located in a wonderful tech hub. The professors bring real-world business experience to the classroom. I loved the multicultural environment and the group projects. Skema gave me great friends, a strong global network, and the right skills for my career.

Nothing to show

Focus on multicultural business management

I have been quite satisfied by the quality of teaching at Audencia. The lecturers and professors are knowledgeable and place an emphasis on professionalism and leveraging culture in business dealings.

Nothing to show

The cultural mix and the great atmosphere.

I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close