IÉSEG School of Management vs SKEMA Business School vs EDHEC Business School vs NEOMA Business School vs ONCAMPUS Global

Side-by-side comparison from 523 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
IÉSEG School of Management: wins 0/6 categories
SKEMA Business School: wins 0/6 categories
EDHEC Business School: wins 0/6 categories
NEOMA Business School: wins 0/6 categories
ONCAMPUS Global: wins 2/6 categories
EM Normandie - EM Normandie: wins 0/6 categories
IDRAC Business School: wins 4/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
Best programme: Supply Chain Management
Best programme: Business Administration in Management
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
London, The United Kingdom
4.80
Read more reviews
20 reviews
×
Best programme: Undergraduate Foundation Programme
Best programme: MSc International Logistics and Port Management
Best programme: MBA IT Business Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
4.08
4.21
4.23
3.86
4.44
4.13
4.75
Win
Location
4.29
4.23
3.77
3.91
4.74
Win
3.75
4.50
Professors
4.28
4.38
4.32
3.97
4.75
4.13
4.75
Internationality
4.55
4.39
4.45
4.22
4.60
Win
4.13
4.50
Student life
4.25
4.14
4.13
4.21
4.56
3.63
4.75
Win
Value
4.31
4.06
4.06
4.19
4.50
4.13
4.75
Win
Accommodation
3.78
3.58
3.21
3.91
4.32
3.57
4.75
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Engaging and practical learning experiences
  • +Strong international and diverse community
  • +Opportunities for personal and professional growth
  • +Industry relevance and practical skills
  • +International exposure and diverse student body
  • +Career opportunities and personal development
  • +Outstanding teaching quality and practical, employer-aligned courses
  • +Strong corporate network and valuable career services
  • +Rigorous academics with practical industry insights
  • +Flexible, international curriculum shaping studies.
  • +Strong networking and community through associations and alumni.
  • +Engaging and professional teaching with diverse student body.
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Excellent facilities and convenient location
  • +Strong academic and personal development support
  • +Practical, industry-relevant courses and inspiring professors
  • +Rich international environment and diverse student body
  • +Personal and professional development opportunities
  • +Strong academic support and faculty availability
  • +Practical, real-world business focus and company connections
  • +Emphasis on international perspective and personal/professional development
Cons
  • -Frequent last-minute changes disrupt scheduling and planning.
  • -Perceived lack of effort to improve the classroom experience.
  • -Concerns about course offerings and professor quality.
  • -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and disorganization.
  • -Perceived focus on profit over student welfare and discriminatory practices.
  • -Ineffective career guidance and problematic teaching faculty.
  • -High tuition fees and perceived poor value for money are a major concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of effective communication and support is prevalent.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep frustrate students.
  • -Lack of resources and inadequate support services are common complaints.
  • -Financial concerns and perceived low educational value.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a consistent complaint.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support are major dissatisfactions.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in several key areas, with Internationality receiving the highest score. Location and Value also received very favorable ratings. Conversely, Accomodation emerged as the area with the lowest score, indicating room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience. Overall, the university presents a compelling offering across most dimensions.

Academic and social aspects of the institution received particularly high marks, with Professors and Internationality scoring above 4.3. Facilities and Location also performed well, both exceeding 4.2. Student Life and Value were rated positively around 4.1. The weakest area identified was Accomodation, which received a score of 3.58.

The university excels in Internationality with a rating of 4.45, closely followed by its Professors at 4.32 and Facilities at 4.23. Student Life and Value also receive positive marks. Conversely, Accomodation presents the weakest area, scoring 3.21, with Location also being a moderate concern at 3.77. Overall, the institution demonstrates strengths in its academic and global offerings, while areas concerning student living arrangements and campus surroundings could see improvement.

Examining the provided university ratings reveals a strong showing in several key areas. Internationality stands out as the highest-rated category, closely followed by Student Life and Value, indicating significant strengths in these aspects. Facilities represent the lowest-scoring area, suggesting room for improvement compared to other metrics. The remaining categories, Professors, Location, and Accomodation, fall within a relatively narrow and positive range.

Overall, the university garners strong ratings across various aspects. Professors are exceptionally well-regarded, achieving the highest score. Location and Internationality also stand out with excellent marks. Student Life, Facilities, and Value also reflect positive sentiment. Accommodation, while still strong, receives the lowest rating among the surveyed categories.

This institution garners excellent marks in several key areas. Facilities, Professors, Internationality, and Value all received high scores of 4.125. Student Life and Accommodations are rated lower, at 3.625 and approximately 3.57 respectively, indicating these are areas with more room for improvement compared to its other strengths. The Location score sits at 3.75.

Across several key areas, this institution garners exceptionally high ratings. Facilities, professors, student life, accommodation, and value all received outstanding scores of 4.75. Location and internationality are also strong points, with ratings of 4.5. This indicates a consistently positive experience for students, with its strongest attributes lying in its academic and residential offerings.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~91% of reviews being 4-5 stars and an average rating of 4.38/5. A small ~0.8% expressed concerns about learning outcomes and last-minute changes.

~97.5% of 161 reviews are positive, highlighting practical, industry-oriented programs, excellent teaching, and international environments. A small ~2.5% of feedback mentions poor management and communication.

With an average rating of 4.25/5 from 48 reviews, ~74% of feedback is positive. Students highlight outstanding teaching quality, practical courses, strong industry alignment, and excellent career services/alumni networks. One negative review mentioned high tuition fees.

With ~74% of reviews being positive, students praise the program's flexibility, international focus, and professionalizing opportunities. Some mention assignments being difficult to balance with revision. No negative reviews were recorded.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~100% of 20 feedback entries rating 4–5 stars. Students praise friendly, supportive teachers, excellent facilities like the library, and effective student support services that build confidence.

Most reviews praise the inspiring professors, practical learning, and international environment, contributing to a ~74% positive sentiment. One review expressed dissatisfaction, calling it a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.

All four reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.75/5. Students praise approachable professors and practical, international learning experiences. Some note campus facilities and student life could be improved with more funding.

Rating distribution
5★
49%
50%
38%
28%
75%
38%
75%
4★
44%
42%
53%
44%
25%
38%
25%
3★
8%
7%
9%
28%
0%
13%
0%
2★
0%
1%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
13%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
A formative and enriching experience

IÉSEG offers interactive teaching and international opportunities. I had the chance to go on an exchange to another country, which opened up new perspectives for me. The courses in Lille are stimulating, and the professors are very involved in our success.

Experience in School

My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.

Enriching Experience

I absolutely love everything about EDHEC, beginning from the pedagogy to the atmosphere it provides to the students (especially international) on campus. The extracurricular activities like sports, associations are very helpful. Also, the career service provided is top-notch. Therefore, I would call it an enriching experience so far.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Excellent Experience at IDRAC

I am a Chinese student and I completed my MBA in Business Engineering at IDRAC Business School and the experience has been excellent. The program fully met my expectations. The professors are very approachable, supportive, and always available. I truly appreciated the strong sense of guidance and personal support throughout the course. Highly recommended!

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close